Recent content by Enigma94

It's still crazy to me that people support this shit.

He's already made $6 million bucks, so if he's making $1.2 million per year now all he has to do is hang around for a few more years and he'll be in great shape for whatever life after football has for him.

Maligning the poor - just as Jesus intended.

Poor white supremacists can never catch a break.

What's the word I'm looking for?? Oh yeah, it's OBLITERATED!

Davis has earned another season but 20 win seasons are meaningless imo.

It's just as hyperbolic to say those who support HD are suspicious of the metrics as it is to say those who want him gone think they are infallible. As proof I offered I don't really support HD long term, although I do think he's earned another year. And I'm not really suspicious of the...

Just as a fact check I am on record saying I don't think HD is the guy. I do think he's done enough this season to earn another one and the whole reason I got into this conversation was to rebut the talking point that this season wasn't really that great because the metrics have us ranked...

I'm the one focusing on the performance of both teams, in particular against the toughest parts of their respective schedules, where UNC majorly outperformed Ohio State. You are making a general argument that looking at totality they are roughly equal. How do two roughly equivalent teams have...

17-13 is a huge variance in betting. Professional gamblers would love to hit that kind of spread. And if "brand" was affecting the lines don't you think Vegas would account for that? Seems like if brand created some kind of mismatched line then gamblers would take advantage of that.

You keep bringing up the ncst game like it's the huge point, but you also keep avoiding the fact that our two best players didn't play in that game. The team we put on the floor that night was nothing like the team we really are. So if your best argument that Ohio State is as good as UNC is...

And UNC is 17-13 against the spread this year, which is another data point indicating they are under ranked in the metrics.

Let me approach this a different way - how many would trade our roster for Ohio State's? I mean if it's basically the identical team then it shouldn't matter which roster we have. Personally I think we have a superior roster with two projected first round picks and one in the top 5. Then you...

I'm really more quibbling with UNC's spot, Ohio State is just one that is right by us with vastly inferior results.

But it begs the question - if the two teams are basically the same, how did we win all those games against superior opponents while they lost basically all of them? Is it just luck? I guess if I'm a one seed and get OSU as my nine seed I should be pissed since they are essentially the same...