I was replying to DonBosco's question which specifically asked about white Supremacy. If its an issue of semantics, take it up with him, but I think its small beer. The terms are fairly interchangeable in this context. The tag for the slate article is white supremacy and not white nationalism...
I think there are plenty of Mexican neighborhoods upset that their neighborhoods were transformed by those lazy central Americans. Which is one of the reason why you saw Trump winning a very large share of hispanics. I guess you could say the same about some black neighborhoods. That's why...
I was going to go point by point since you took the time to write it out but it seemed like most of my responses took the form of "its really more of a nativist argument than a racist argument." I'm sure there are plenty of people of all races that don't like the new guys coming in. That's a...
There is no doubt there are racists. There likely will be for hundreds of years. I'm certainly not saying racism is a thing of the past.
But I don't think a guy's speech saying things like look at these great things Americans invented or achieved rises to that level. I don't think a speech...
I just can't see white supremacy in there or at least it wasn't the intent of the speech. He was celebrating some American accomplishments while minimizing the conquest and genocide of the natives (an event that a large number of black Americans participated in as well BTW). But that is not...
Don't think this was a white nationalist speech and the Lincoln reference is a streeeetch.
I think the Senator is going to love the Slate piece. That speech just went from something 1000 people heard to something millions heard. He's going to love the attention and the campaign donations.
Obviously can't say for sure but I heard this interview with Colonel Aguilar and he seemed very credible while Reverend Johnny Moore seemed like a shyster.
I remember seeing the thriller album in the grocery store of all places and being so young that I didn't have the $6.99 to buy it. Begged my parents for it and never got it.
The AI companies might be able to train their models when electricity demand is low. There is no technical reason why they couldn't train hardcore at night when power demand is low and pull back during the day. The AI companies would prefer not to do that so they can maximize their AI chip...
I'm glad we don't but it's a little surprising to me that we don't charge different rates for different uses of electricity. I could definitely see a scenario where people vote to have industrial and commercial uses subsidize residential uses of electricity.
I believe right now most industrial...
Not publicly. He's about as apolitical as every other football coach that wants to recruit Republicans and Democrats. Pretty much every football coach except for the guy at Liberty