I agree. And do you want to be guaranteed that process because you want to keep the government honest before it deprives you of life, liberty, or property? As you said, you expect to be punished if you break the law. Presumably you also expect not to be punished if you don't. Isn't the...
I'm asking about you. I agree no one is above the law. Nor is anyone beneath it.
Suppose you're charged with a crime. One you didn't commit, since we're all in agreement that everyone should follow the law. Do you believe you're entitled to due process?
And if our government accuses you of doing something against the law? Would you like the government to have to prove their case or you're okay with straight to jail?
My rhetorical question to anyone opposed to bringing Abrego Garcia back is this: If you can achieve the same result (deportation to El Salvador) or substantially the same result (deportation to some other country) while following the law, why would you not want to do that? Is the law-flouting...
I think he did, though not as directly and not as publicly. Also, the declaratory judgment remedy came in post-Nixon, so at a minimum no direct precedent under that provision of the Code.
I kind of hope the administration does revoke Harvard's exemption because I'm fascinated to see how a high-profile and political case would play out here. I think Harvard would prevail easily, and I think it would put a hard stop to the administration floating revocation of tax exemption as a...
Trump admin: Ready, FIRE, aim!
People that care about the law: You guys, it needs to be ready, aim, then fire.
Trump admin: Did you not see us aim!? You're aiding and abetting terrorism!
There's a misdirection that JD Vance and the rest of the admin and right wing news networks are using in bad faith, and individuals already inclined to agree with the admin seem to be running with it. And that misdirection is that this is about Abrego Garcia, the individual. Or even that it is...