Recent content by whsgrad33

This is one place I completely agree with y'all. He is absolutely insane! I watched his video on multiplication and I can tell you as a math teacher, HE IS INSANE!!!

No it doesn't mean there is something to the story. It means some idiot made it up on Twitter and it went viral and now it has to be corrected. People will believe anything on Twitter and the internet these days.

I don't disagree with any of this really. That's why I didn't really argue the point and just went with the flow. I wouldn't call glass or wood cause from the bullet, "shrapnel." I would call it debris and those were the most common things people were saying hit his ear. Especially the first...

You're right. I used that word wrong the last 2 weeks because I just went with the flow of almost everyone else using it to mean something other than a bullet just to not argue over it. Most people using that word almost always coupled it with glass and rare instances, wood. So, I just went...

Right. I have been thinking for days that most people were using the word shrapnel wrong. By definition of the word shrapnel, it is fragments of something that exploded. So, the bullet. I just don't know what would have made it fragment if there was an unobstructed straight line of site from...

The majority doesn't say that didn't happen. But, when the director made that statement and then had to be corrected the next day, it doesn't quite give confidence in him. Why did he even make that statement? It wasn't part of any question. He just offered it up on a whim. But, again, I...

The FBI said it was a bullet or a fragment of the bullet from the rifle of Crooks. FBI said it was not shrapnel. Wray insinuated there was a question it could be Shrapnel but the next day the FBI said "it was the bullet of fragment of the bullet from Crooks rifle." So, no, I am not open to it...

It's literally the title and reason for this thread.

LOL!

LOL! OK. How many reports do you need to understand that his ear was cut by the bullet but didn't need stitches. The reports have also stated no further damage. That includes his brain. Doctors have stated that the ear bleeds a lot and yes needed to be covered. Again, how many do you need...

Didn't say that. No, I don't think the dems did this and I don't think Trump set this up. Those 2 are crazy things. I mean others were injured and died. They wouldn't have done that! I do WONDER if he had others with him planning and doing this. It has come out now that others were...

LOL! What do you expect to uncover with these questions? The FBI said he was hit by a bullet. It has been said that the ear was injured but not bad enough to need stitches. What more do you want to know about the ear? Does the extent of the injury change how close he was to dying? I want...

You know that is completely out of context of what he said. He said you wouldn't HAVE TO not wouldn't BE ABLE TO. Meaning that he would have it fixed where it wouldn't be as important to vote in 4 years. In your hero's words, COME ON MAN!

You know it is possible to be against Harris (and Obama) without being racist! It's the policies not their race!