More that I'm puzzled by it. I don't much believe in the death penalty because it's so unfairly administered but I'm not much opposed because I don't particularly believe in the sanctity of human life so I don't see a good reason for a Gacy or Bundy to live. It's just that if you oppose it on principle, making exceptions doesn't make any sense to me. As I said, life imprisonment with no chance of parole is not exactly a slap on the wrist.
There are actually zero reasons to be for the death penalty. By this I mean reasons outside of depravity and psychopathy.
* It costs more, often
far more on average than life in prison
* It actually does not bring quote, "closure," unquote, to victims (what
outsiders actually mean by this is often revenge, though many do not put it in honest terms)
Proponents claim that the death penalty brings closure to the families of murder victims. But countless families of murder victims experience greater trauma at the hands of this lengthy and complex process.
ejusa.org
* It is not "justice," especially and obviously in bringing no dead victim(s) back to life, nor in other ways, and hugely applied in a myriad of unjust ways
* It is zero deterrence -- probably the biggest myth that has been promoted about it over time
* It is not actually the best revenge, if that is what you want, and that is in fact what most supporters want out of it. Life in prison is a continual and cumulative torture over an extended period. Death is the elimination of that torture.
Fun facts: America joins China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Egypt as the main countries of execution. A third of recent American executions were botched in some way. More than 60 global pharmaceutical companies won't allow their drugs to be used in capital punishment. With no reliable access, Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Utah and South Carolina have passed laws to allow prisoners to choose to die by firing squad as an alternative. Recent use of nitrogen gas is functionally identical to putting a plastic bag over someone's head to kill them.