Charlie Kirk shot and killed at Utah rally.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rock
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 442
  • Views: 7K
  • Politics 
Pretty depraved post.

So you're saying that because Charlie Kirk is an unapologetic Christian conservative, whom you don't like, he "deserves" (reaps what he sows) to be shot by a left wing political assassin? Got it.
Nobody deserves to be shot, but he bears a tremendous amount of responsibility for the political temperature that exists right now. He also was brazenly apathetic to school shooting victims and called human empathy incredibly dangerous. This shouldn’t have happened, but it’s hard to feel much for him.
 
This is today’s left/democrat party. You see it on this site daily.

Super has mentioned on this thread how conservatives need to feel pain(sic).

And holier than thou nyc allows her comrades to insult, berate, curse out, name call every conservative on this board and bans any and all newcomers.

Today shows exactly how desperate the left is to try and regain power.

The mere justification that most have tried to use and spin shows how bad your party has become.

You wanted the thunder…. Well…. Here is the left’s FAFO moment.

And Super… you deranged blow hard psychopath…. There is a reason you dont have custody of your kids and it is on full display on this site.

I hope your exwife has access to the shit you post, the threats you make and the way you conduct yourself.

Karma is one undefeated bitch and you know it all academics who have contributed nothing worthwhile for years are about to realize it.

Creating a martyr and calling for gun control is going to go over really well as your party has proven its mission.

I’m sure this will be deleted but forvtgose of you who read this i sincerely hope you find God and pull your head out of your asses before you end up like Super, Wayne, Finesse, Strange etc…. Bitter no life having pieces of shit.
Welcome back! I can't wait for the next username!
 
......

that wasn't "MSNBC" that was an unmoderated guest on the audio on tur's show.

pretending as if that's an idea or content that MSNBC is pushing is absurd. that was probably some eyewitness or official or person on the scene in utah.

y'all are insane.
Are they known to shoot guns off at his events…
 
which is why these people need to be added to super-ignore by everyone. They are not here for serious conversation. They are here to quench an urge. In some cases a fetish.
Did you see how fast heel79 was here starting a thread about it?
 
This is today’s left/democrat party. You see it on this site daily.

Super has mentioned on this thread how conservatives need to feel pain(sic).

And holier than thou nyc allows her comrades to insult, berate, curse out, name call every conservative on this board and bans any and all newcomers.

Today shows exactly how desperate the left is to try and regain power.

The mere justification that most have tried to use and spin shows how bad your party has become.

You wanted the thunder…. Well…. Here is the left’s FAFO moment.

And Super… you deranged blow hard psychopath…. There is a reason you dont have custody of your kids and it is on full display on this site.

I hope your exwife has access to the shit you post, the threats you make and the way you conduct yourself.

Karma is one undefeated bitch and you know it all academics who have contributed nothing worthwhile for years are about to realize it.

Creating a martyr and calling for gun control is going to go over really well as your party has proven its mission.

I’m sure this will be deleted but forvtgose of you who read this i sincerely hope you find God and pull your head out of your asses before you end up like Super, Wayne, Finesse, Strange etc…. Bitter no life having pieces of shit.
"And holier than thou nyc allows her comrades to insult, berate, curse out, name call every conservative on this board and bans any and all newcomers."

Sorry my guy. That dog won't hunt. That is one complaint you can't make with any credibility. She has proven to be completely fair. She and I disagree on politics but she doesn't play favorites in her role as moderator.
 
Eh, for someone who's a fairly prominent political figure I think it's fair to use the term "assassinated" preliminarily. If it turns out that it was, like, some personal vendetta with nothing to do with politics, we can debate then whether that term is appropriate.
why would we debate that then?

I was wondering if I missed something. It's a pretty definitive term. It's of course possible and even likely but doesn't seem like we know enough to say.
 
Back
Top