Congress Catch-All | House passes CR, no debt ceiling change

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 455
  • Views: 9K
  • Politics 
ChileG said:
I don’t understand. You say there is no way Trump will seek a third time and then post evidence that shows he absolutely is considering the idea.
Trump saying he won’t seek a third term with the qualifier “unless you think I’m so good…” is like an alcoholic promising to never drink again “unless I want to.”
Click to expand...
He's saying that Republicans would have to do something to give him the option to run for a third term. Republicans aren't going to do that. There is no way. It would be political suicide.
 
ZenMode said:
He's saying that Republicans would have to do something to give him the option to run for a third term. Republicans aren't going to do that. There is no way. It would be political suicide.
Click to expand...
I encourage you to Google Trump and political suicide and see how many times over the last decade we've been told his nomination or his actions have amounted to political suicide. And yet, here we are...
 
lawtig02 said:
Doubt it. I think it just means Johnson’s remaining days are very few. But the chaos and incompetence may continue, and that could be a good thing relatively speaking.
Click to expand...
I think they will seriously put Elon in the role at this point. He can certainly financially threaten his way in to the position.
 
ZenMode said:
He's not running for a 3rd term. He's not going to refuse to leave office. He's going to do his 2nd term and leave office because there's no way in hell Republicans will ever.... EVER even attempt to do something as dumb as pushing for a constitutional change to allow more than 2 terms.
Click to expand...
I don't think a constitutional change has to happen.

The 22nd Amendment says "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."

So suppose Trump runs as VP on a ticket with Person X at the top of the ticket. And with a wink and a nod it's understood by all that, if they win, Person X will immediately resign the presidency. Trump becomes President again by operation of the 25th Amendment, and he wasn't elected to the office more than twice. Tell me with confidence this Supreme Court wouldn't uphold that.
 
TangledUpInBlue06 said:
I encourage you to Google Trump and political suicide and see how many times over the last decade we've been told his nomination or his actions have amounted to political suicide. And yet, here we are...
Click to expand...
Because to his supporters it doesn't matter as long as the ultimate focus is the hope of a fascist nation for straight white Christian nationalism.
 
TangledUpInBlue06 said:
I don't think a constitutional change has to happen.

The 22nd Amendment says "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."

So suppose Trump runs as VP on a ticket with Person X at the top of the ticket. And with a wink and a nod it's understood by all that, if they win, Person X will immediately resign the presidency. Trump becomes President again by operation of the 25th Amendment, and he wasn't elected to the office more than twice. Tell me with confidence this Supreme Court wouldn't uphold that.
Click to expand...
I've seen that supported by some legal scholars. Don't see why someone would do that for him. That's pissing on the public's head and telling them it's raining.

I've never been in favor of the 22nd Amendment anyway so I'm not offended with the idea of doing away with it. There's a good chance that either Trump, me or both wouldn't make it that long anyway. If Americans ended up with him again, they probably deserve it.
 
finesse said:
I've seen that supported by some legal scholars. Don't see why someone would do that for him. That's pissing on the public's head and telling them it's raining.

I've never been in favor of the 22nd Amendment anyway so I'm not offended with the idea of doing away with it. There's a good chance that either Trump, me or both wouldn't make it that long anyway. If Americans ended up with him again, they probably deserve it.
Click to expand...
But I wouldn't say they deserve it if he won and didn't win the popular vote. The majority of the country shouldn't have to suffer with a narcissistic sociopath as President just because a lot of idiots are racists, bigots, and just plain idiots.
 
altmin said:
I think they will seriously put Elon in the role at this point. He can certainly financially threaten his way in to the position.
Click to expand...

I can’t really see them doing that. For two reasons. That would probably be the literal inflection point.

Also, it would bind Musk to the rules of the office. Right now he can be lawless.
 
finesse said:
I've seen that supported by some legal scholars?
Click to expand...
who? the 12th is clear. "But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States"

the "slide in thru the back strategy" cannot be accomplished this way. it would require a vp to resign, congress to appoint trump to vp, then the president to resign.
 
StoneColdHeel said:
But I wouldn't say they deserve it if he won and didn't win the popular vote. The majority of the country shouldn't have to suffer with a narcissistic sociopath as President just because a lot of idiots are racists, bigots, and just plain idiots.
Click to expand...
Do you ever stop to think about implications? If the public supported a ticket where he was running as vp, then they would have to be terminally stupid not to see this coming.
 
So let's say at the end of his term, Trump announces that as an official act of his office he will continue as president for an indefinite period.

Who would enforce his removal from office ?

His SCOTUS ?
His DOJ ?
His House of Representatives ?

Should a Dem controlled House impeach would cowardly GQP Senators risk a primary with a MAGA stooge and convict ?

Should he be impeached and convicted , who would enforce his removal from office ?
 
nycfan said:
Republicans like Chip Roy need to be “Done away with”?

“Our Country is better off closing up for a period of time than agreeing to the things the Democrats want …”

“Go for the Victory even if it means shutting the Government down for a period of time”
Click to expand...
nothing says america first like closing the country.
 
heelinhell said:
So let's say at the end of his term, Trump announces that as an official act of his office he will continue as president for an indefinite period.

Who would enforce his removal from office ?
Click to expand...
the military and that is the purpose of pete hegseth
 
superrific said:
who? the 12th is clear. "But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States"

the "slide in thru the back strategy" cannot be accomplished this way. it would require a vp to resign, congress to appoint trump to vp, then the president to resign.
Click to expand...
Clearly, I don't have a clue but if you Google the topic, there are several arguments of that nature that will pop up. I haven't the knowledge to judge the argument or the qualifications of the people making it but I am qualified to tell you people are making it.
 
finesse said:
Clearly, I don't have a clue but if you Google the topic, there are several arguments of that nature that will pop up. I haven't the knowledge to judge the argument or the qualifications of the people making it but I am qualified to tell you people are making it.
Click to expand...
all i see are arguments that trump (or obama) could ascend to the presidency through the vice presidency, if the person could become vice president without being elected. and that is true. but there's no reason to go that route. if the plan hinges on the president and vice president both resign, just make trump speaker and do it that way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top