Congress Catch-All | Laken Riley Act is first bill passed by House

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 556
  • Views: 13K
  • Politics 
  • After the vote, Self and Norman told reporters they spoke to Johnson and President-elect Donald Trump, who stressed the need for party unity. They both said Johnson reassured them that he would fight to advance Trump's agenda with Republicans in control of Congress and the White House.
I knew these slimy fucks wouldn't sack up. Good for Massie.
 
  • After the vote, Self and Norman told reporters they spoke to Johnson and President-elect Donald Trump, who stressed the need for party unity. They both said Johnson reassured them that he would fight to advance Trump's agenda with Republicans in control of Congress and the White House.
I knew these slimy fucks wouldn't sack up. Good for Massie.
Trump threatened to have them primaried.
 

" ... As the utter chaos that erupted as lawmakers struggled to write a year-end bill to fund the government demonstrated, the GOP has a tenuous grip on the House. President-elect Donald Trump has a penchant for chaos. And Republicans are at odds over a long list of issues, beginning with whether they should take up tax first this year or immigration.

After weeks of negotiations, it looks like they’ll begin with the border. ..."

[As for the tax bill, there is a lot still for the GOP to negotiate amongst themselves, for starters, to "cover" the $4 Trillion price tag.]

"... [Senate Finance Chair] Crapo says extending current policy, like the tax cuts from Trump’s first term that are set to expire at the end of this year, shouldn’t cost anything. Nor should what he calls “pro-growth” provisions — leaving only new ideas that don’t do much for the economy needing offsets.

... Republicans have already offered a long list of possibilities: higher tariffs, increasing the college endowment tax, cutting green energy credits, rescinding IRS funding, cutting other government spending, among many others.

There’s a chicken-and-egg quality to the debate though, because it’s hard to know how much they need to raise when they haven’t decided how much to spend. And lawmakers will be subject to furious lobbying by those worried they’re on the menu.

... If Republicans decide not to worry too much about the price tag, one way to paper over the projected hit to the deficit would be to change the yardstick used to measure the cost of their plans.

Normally, bills are compared to what’s in the law now, which would require taking account the cost of extending the expiring tax cuts. But Crapo wants to instead compare it to current policy, which would mean extending them would appear to cost nothing.

That would sidestep the need for big payfors and make it easier to extend the provisions for a long time. ..."

----
So just pretend that tax cuts cost nothing and you are generating magical thinking amounts of income from tariffs and POOF no problemo. We'll be ROLLING in dough.
 

"...But with $437 billion in personal wealth and a political funnel in America PAC, he’s also begun to directly shape the makeup of the legislative body.”

“Now there are Musk-backed lawmakers on committees that oversee transportation, space, artificial intelligence, social media, defense spending and other areas that directly affect Musk’s companies. The billionaire has promised more to come ahead of the 2026 midterm elections."
 

"...But with $437 billion in personal wealth and a political funnel in America PAC, he’s also begun to directly shape the makeup of the legislative body.”

“Now there are Musk-backed lawmakers on committees that oversee transportation, space, artificial intelligence, social media, defense spending and other areas that directly affect Musk’s companies. The billionaire has promised more to come ahead of the 2026 midterm elections."
I wonder if that $437 B figure includes the compensation that was voided by the Delaware judge.
 


Would be beyond lame for Congress to claim they cannot certify the election due to snow. Good lord.
 


Would be beyond lame for Congress to claim they cannot certify the election due to snow. Good lord.

Oh, they'll certify him all right. None of them wants to offend Dear Leader and his allies (like Musk) unnecessarily over something like this, so I'm sure they'll have enough votes on hand to certify him as the winner.
 


Would be beyond lame for Congress to claim they cannot certify the election due to snow. Good lord.

The good news is that even if there aren't enough Pubs to have a majority, there will be enough Dems in attendance to meet the need for a quorum and those Dems will do the right thing by certifying the election.

I would be much more worried about shenanigans if Harris had won and Pubs thought they could somehow either delay certification or something worse.
 
Back
Top