Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This has to be one of the most infuriatingly idiotic parts of modern American politics, mainly because it has such a significant impact on voting behavior. And to revisit a prior discussion on this, while both parties swing a bit based on who is in office, Pubs swing WILDLY and with no rational connection whatsoever to what’s really happening in the market. Economic illiteracy among the American right is one of the greatest threats to the country today, and it’s being constantly reinforced by right wing media and political leaders.
To understand even the most basic concepts of economics requires a capacity for abstract thought. Conservatives generally, and MAGAs especially, tend to be literal/ concrete thinkers and have little, if any, understanding of basic economics.This has to be one of the most infuriatingly idiotic parts of modern American politics, mainly because it has such a significant impact on voting behavior. And to revisit a prior discussion on this, while both parties swing a bit based on who is in office, Pubs swing WILDLY and with no rational connection whatsoever to what’s really happening in the market. Economic illiteracy among the American right is one of the greatest threats to the country today, and it’s being constantly reinforced by right wing media and political leaders.
I haven't seen any data, but I wonder what % of Americans have actually been experiencing economic hardship today compared to the Trump, Obama, and Bush administrations.I generally agree with this. But I don’t want it to be lost that people in this country were (and continue to) experiencing economic hardship in the areas that hit them most on a week to week basis: grocery prices and rent prices.
These factors are rarely accounted for in discussions of the so-called “vibecession,” which is a pretty arrogant way to talk about economics when you consider that poor and working people were struggling and continue to struggle.
There are a ton of MAGAs who were making out relatively fine in these years. The middle-class to upper-class suburban Republican is still a big part of Trump’s coalition. Of course there is a brainwashed segment who will flip on a dime based on who is in office, we already knew that way before 2021.
While you’re right about the economic reality, that doesn’t really relate to Krugman’s comments (or mine), which are about economic perception and voting behavior. Unless, that is, you’re aware of data showing poorer Americans don’t swing with party changes like everyone else does. The reality, I’m almost sure, is that poorer conservatives are just as hypocritical on this as the rest of the GOP, and while we can support initiatives to improve their position, we shouldn’t hesitate to call out their hypocrisy. Especially when it’s massively counterproductive.I generally agree with this. But I don’t want it to be lost that people in this country were (and continue to) experiencing economic hardship in the areas that hit them most on a week to week basis: grocery prices and rent prices.
These factors are rarely accounted for in discussions of the so-called “vibecession,” which is a pretty arrogant way to talk about economics when you consider that poor and working people were struggling and continue to struggle.
There are a ton of MAGAs who were making out relatively fine in these years. The middle-class to upper-class suburban Republican is still a big part of Trump’s coalition. Of course there is a brainwashed segment who will flip on a dime based on who is in office, we already knew that way before 2021.
Does your rent make up 50% of your net pay ?![]()
The average U.S. renter now spends 30% of their income on rent, a new all-time high
When people have to spend more and more on rent, there’s not much left over for other essentials.www.marketplace.org
I might be one of the only renters on the board. Shit is historically absurd.
I knew rent was expensive in NYC but 68% is wild. 30% across the nation is slightly lower than I would have predicted, however, given increases over the past couple years.![]()
The average U.S. renter now spends 30% of their income on rent, a new all-time high
When people have to spend more and more on rent, there’s not much left over for other essentials.www.marketplace.org
I might be one of the only renters on the board. Shit is historically absurd.
I bought my house in 1982 during the Reagan recession. My mortgage was a 12.5% variable rate and inflation was about to get down into single digits after two years of double digit inflation.No, thankfully I’m well-off compared to most of my peers. We can afford the rent hit.
Not sure when you bought your first home, but there are a ton more expenses that people face today when just trying to live a normal life IMO.
When rent is outrageous and groceries are expensive, that leaves little room for anything else. Now add on insurance, internet, phone bill, car payment, gas, etc. All of which have gotten more expensive.
There’s also very few social spaces/experiences left that don’t require spending a lot money in order to access. This wasn’t the case until relatively recently.
It’s not an Olympics of whether young people have suffered more than older people. I don’t see why it’s so hard to acknowledge that things are hard now in different ways that older people can’t really understand, and the same goes the other way. Just have empathy.
I agree with youRight. What we’re discussing here is not whether every generation has experienced hardship in some way or another. That’s obviously true. What’s at issue here is a certain segment of people saying that there actually aren’t economic issues because the GDP is up and the stock market is doing good.
It amounts to what feels like a dismissal of people’s everyday lived experiences of high rent and high groceries. That sort of attitude is what has gotten Democrats further away from working people and has been part of the recipe Trump and others have exploited.
No, this discussion is (or at least was) about people, regardless of income level, who think the economy is bad when a Dem is in charge but miraculously start to think the same economy is great when a Pub is in charge. It’s a phenomenon that infects both parties, but it’s a mild cold among Dems and an outbreak of the bubonic plague among Pubs.Right. What we’re discussing here is not whether every generation has experienced hardship in some way or another. That’s obviously true. What’s at issue here is a certain segment of people saying that there actually aren’t economic issues because the GDP is up and the stock market is doing good.
It amounts to what feels like a dismissal of people’s everyday lived experiences of high rent and high groceries. That sort of attitude is what has gotten Democrats further away from working people and has been part of the recipe Trump and others have exploited.
If you read that Krugman post again, I don’t think he was talking about dismissing grievances based on vibes. He was specifically commenting on the infuriating phenomenon in which Pubs think the economy is bad when a Dem is in office, but change their minds overnight (without any change to the actual economy) when a Pub is elected. That’s the vibe he was talking about there. And he’s 100% right.That’s what part of the discussion was about. Nycfan specifically invoked the vibescession argument and its proponents like Krugman.
These people are using the real phenomenon that we’re also talking about as a victory lap to “prove” their earlier theories about people’s economic grievances just being based on “vibes.”
As an older person, I completely understand because I see how things are impacting my kids.No, thankfully I’m well-off compared to most of my peers. We can afford the rent hit.
Not sure when you bought your first home, but there are a ton more expenses that people face today when just trying to live a normal life IMO.
When rent is outrageous and groceries are expensive, that leaves little room for anything else. Now add on insurance, internet, phone bill, car payment, gas, etc. All of which have gotten more expensive.
There’s also very few social spaces/experiences left that don’t require spending a lot money in order to access. This wasn’t the case until relatively recently.
It’s not an Olympics of whether young people have suffered more than older people. I don’t see why it’s so hard to acknowledge that things are hard now in different ways that older people can’t really understand, and the same goes the other way. Just have empathy.
Part of the issue here is that they are arguing with people who don't seem to understand actual causes and how many components of the economy lag. The Biden administration and the public did suffer from what was left after trump and covid. Trump's first term got the benefit of a pretty strong economy from Obama, trump's policies and COVID didn't maintain that economy. And I do believe that COVID was probably more impactful than trump, his policies didn't improve anything.I agree with you
The mistake that Dems made was to downplay the "feelings" that the voters were suffering some unique hardship that others have not experienced under similar circumstances in the past.
Moreover, Dems made the mistake of "arguing" that their economic situation was actually improving since Trump left office. Dems made the mistake that voters were experiencing amnesia regarding the horrendous economic situation Trump left Biden on his way out the door.
The odds are that these working people will suffer greatly in the next Trump administration. The unknown is whether they will "feel" it.
When rent is outrageous and groceries are expensive, that leaves little room for anything else. Now add on insurance, internet, phone bill, car payment, gas, etc. All of which have gotten more expensive.
This is the part that breaks my heart for the youngins