Epstein Files | Ghislaine Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 4K
  • Views: 115K
  • Politics 
nycfan said:
Click to expand...

Sooo....this helps here right? these people are like petty sixth graders.

We see now the name and the mistake... and he's just an agitator anyway. They will try to chase this(like here) to no avail while they ignore the disgusting behavior of the predator Epstein and his friends who were trying to cover up their tracks.

This is not gonna work
 
thebruinbleedstarheelblue said:
Sooo....this helps here right? these people are like petty sixth graders.

We see now the name and the mistake... and he's just an agitator anyway. They will try to chase this(like here) to no avail while they ignore the disgusting behavior of the predator Epstein and his friends who were trying to cover up their tracks.

This is not gonna work
Click to expand...
Crockett was dumb for not checking which Jeffrey Epstein had donated to Republicans before bringing it into the public sphere.

This is just slightly less dumb, but not terribly surprising.
 
SnoopRob said:
Crockett was dumb for not checking which Jeffrey Epstein had donated to Republicans before bringing it into the public sphere.

This is just slightly less dumb, but not terribly surprising.
Click to expand...
that's fine, I just don't think a mistake like this get outraged that they want nor deflects.

I'm frankly makes it easy for anyone to pivot back to the real Jeffrey Epstein... and how we got this addressed quickly but still are playing cover-up.

I don't think they wanna do anything that keeps Epstein's name front and center.
 
thebruinbleedstarheelblue said:
that's fine, I just don't think a mistake like this get outraged that they want nor deflects.

I'm frankly makes it easy for anyone to pivot back to the real Jeffrey Epstein... and how we got this addressed quickly but still are playing cover-up.

I don't think they wanna do anything that keeps Epstein's name front and center.
Click to expand...
It's a tempest in a teapot for the terminally politically-engaged that will make no real difference in the greater issue.

it doesn't keep Epstein in the news nor does it really distract from the real Epstein problem. That case is going to stay in the news for the foreseeable future because there are many various groups who have a significant interest in it while the current administration has a vested interest in not being transparent.

The other Jeffrey Epstein stuff was stupid when Crockett raised the issue and it's stupid now.
 

Law firm representing alleged Epstein victims sends scathing letter over DOJ document release​


“… According to the attorneys' filing, the House Oversight release included the unredacted names and personal information of dozens of victims, including women who were minors at the time of their abuse. One document alone contained 28 unredacted names of alleged victim, the attorneys wrote.

Based on the scope of the issue, the attorneys said that they believe the DOJ either "does not know the identities of all the victims of Jeffrey Epstein and thus cannot apply proper redactions to the files," or "is intentionally failing to protect victims from public exposure."

"While we will detail the various excuses that the Court will no doubt be provided, this is absolutely unacceptable and a program that must be rectified prior to the public release of any additional documents," the Edwards Henderson attorneys wrote.

The filing further noted that the DOJ publicly acknowledged in July that "Epstein harmed over one thousand victims." Based on that statement, the attorneys asked in the filing that the court confirm with the DOJ that, prior to submitting the files to the House Oversight Committee, "it undertook the onerous and necessary task of redacting all one thousand plus victim names that it had in its possession."

"On that pointed inquiry, the court will learn the DOJ's redaction process and its process efforts are so irreconcilable with the number of victims it has publicly acknowledged that, when confronted with the discrepancy, its response will land somewhere between incoherent mumbling, non sequitur, and outright misrepresentation," the attorneys wrote.…”
 
Tomorrow will be two weeks since Trump signed the Epstein bill. The bill requires DOJ files to be released by December 19, but there's nothing stopping them from being released immediately.

Tick tick, Donald. If this will be bad for a bunch of Dems, as you've been assuring us, what's the hold up?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top