—> ICE / Immigration / Video from ICE shooter POV released, firestorm ensues
- Thread starter nycfan
- Start date
- Replies: 4K
- Views: 136K
- Politics
- Messages
- 2,616
Absolutely!
- Messages
- 2,168
And extradite the ones we can't prosecute to Venezuela.
CallMeTyler
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 611
Nothing less. Fuck the Supreme Court "Immunity" ruling. Fuck any "pardons" by DJT. Fuck any "pre-existing decorum".
If Dems and the next candidate they run doesn't guarantee complete and utter annihiliation of MAGA, they can kiss my vote goodbye forever.
superrific
Master of the ZZLverse
- Messages
- 11,438
By the way, here is the law on whether the officer can be charged by Minnesota:
*the state cannot prosecute if the officer was acting within his duty as an ICE officer, and if in doing that , he did not more than what was necessary and proper for him to do.
I'm guessing that the analysis would proceed as follows (I don't know much about this issue of law):
1. Was he acting within his duty as an ICE officer? Yes. He was out there doing his job. The fact that he was doing his job corruptly comes up in the next prong:
2. Did he do more more than what was necessary and proper for him to do? In this context, he will say that he was acting in self-defense. Thus, the state will have to show that he didn't believe he was actually in danger, or that if he was, it was an objectively unreasonable belief.
The question will likely be decided in the first instance by a federal district court judge. I'd imagine that the video clearly shows that it was not objectively reasonable.
But then it goes to the 8th. Bad place to be for MN.
*the state cannot prosecute if the officer was acting within his duty as an ICE officer, and if in doing that , he did not more than what was necessary and proper for him to do.
I'm guessing that the analysis would proceed as follows (I don't know much about this issue of law):
1. Was he acting within his duty as an ICE officer? Yes. He was out there doing his job. The fact that he was doing his job corruptly comes up in the next prong:
2. Did he do more more than what was necessary and proper for him to do? In this context, he will say that he was acting in self-defense. Thus, the state will have to show that he didn't believe he was actually in danger, or that if he was, it was an objectively unreasonable belief.
The question will likely be decided in the first instance by a federal district court judge. I'd imagine that the video clearly shows that it was not objectively reasonable.
But then it goes to the 8th. Bad place to be for MN.
- Messages
- 2,546
Or South Sudan.
DougDaBroadcasta
Distinguished Member
- Messages
- 300
It might be. The next 72 hours will tell us everything.
DougDaBroadcasta
Distinguished Member
- Messages
- 300
DougDaBroadcasta
Distinguished Member
- Messages
- 300
I refuse to let the murderer's face be forgotten:
- Messages
- 1,069
Could be a sprained wrist from his gun recoiling.
Could be fragments of her skull that got in his eye.
Is that even a real picture or is it AI? The only videos I have seen have shown that guy with a mask on.I refuse to let the murderer's face be forgotten:
- Messages
- 2,168
I read that her window was rolled down because she was talking to them
gtyellowjacket
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 2,799
Wow. Bold move by a TV host making $4M a year. Good for him.
gtyellowjacket
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 2,799
AI. I think this is the original image. But the pitchforks will be out for a computer generated guy or some poor sob who looks remotely similar.
- Messages
- 1,799
I'm sorry, but that crowd should have rushed that ICE agent and taken him apart piece by piece. It would have been a justifiable slaughter of a sub-human that doesn't deserve to share the same earth with the rest of humanity.
Whomever the next president is needs to go after this guy with every legal (or otherwise) means that they have.
Whomever the next president is needs to go after this guy with every legal (or otherwise) means that they have.
- Messages
- 3,822
Over and over again, even in Wake county, I have seen videos of scenes where lethal force was used by the police "because they had reason to believe their life was in danger' Many were weak-but I get it
The only resaon anyone was in danger was because they were hanging on to a slowly moving car. I suppose they wil say that the driver said
"I am gonna run over you"?
The only resaon anyone was in danger was because they were hanging on to a slowly moving car. I suppose they wil say that the driver said
"I am gonna run over you"?
Tar1978Heel
Exceptional Member
- Messages
- 168
Or maybe obey law enforcement when they ask you to get out of the car. They have an impossible job. They have families at home as well. It’s a sad situation all the way around.