J6 News | Trump awards gala for J6 “Patriots”; Pelosi rage on J6

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 33
  • Views: 726
This needs to get a lot of press coverage. Of course deranged MAGA will eat this up. It will not move the needle, it just feeds his already worshipping cult.

But the rest of the sane people in this country need to know about this.
 
"According to FindLaw, insurrection is a crime that involves acts of violence against the state or its officers. The federal law against insurrection, 18 U.S.C. § 2383, states that anyone who incites, assists, or engages in insurrection against the authority of the United States or its laws is guilty of the offense. The punishment for insurrection can include up to 10 years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and disqualification from holding federal office."

Seems the SOB has admitted insurrection. Lock him up,Lock him up,Lock him up,Lock him up,,,,,.
 


HBO had not aired all the footage it had of happenings in the Capitol for a documentary…
 
Trump is scum and the people that went into the Capitol that day are scum. Trump was the whole reason it happened. Of all the things he has done that he should be in jail for, leading an insurrection against the government should be at the top of the list.
 
Last edited:
tarheelbillie said:
"According to FindLaw, insurrection is a crime that involves acts of violence against the state or its officers. The federal law against insurrection, 18 U.S.C. § 2383, states that anyone who incites, assists, or engages in insurrection against the authority of the United States or its laws is guilty of the offense. The punishment for insurrection can include up to 10 years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and disqualification from holding federal office."

Seems the SOB has admitted insurrection. Lock him up,Lock him up,Lock him up,Lock him up,,,,,.
Click to expand...

If you're really interested if Trump or anyone is guilty of insurrection, read this link from the Marshall project. TLDR, insurrection is very difficult to prove legally. Sedition or seditious conspiracy is probably what you're talking about.

www.themarshallproject.org

A Civilian's Guide to Insurrection Legalese

Sedition. Treason. Conspiracy. They’re all federal crimes, and they’re all being thrown around a lot after the assault on the Capitol. But what exactly do these terms mean?
www.themarshallproject.org www.themarshallproject.org

So why hasn't Trump been charged with seditious conspiracy? That's also very difficult to prove but a lower bar than insurrection. The proud boys and the oath keeper leaders were charged and convicted of seditious conspiracy. I'm guessing Trump wasn't charged probably due to him not meeting the bar of overt acts.

Most of the defendants were charged with lesser crimes like obstruction of an official proceeding of Congress. Trump was charged and indicted for similar crimes and now after a somewhat questionable Supreme Court decision, the charges have been amended but are somewhat similar. So in summary, insurrection and sedition are very difficult to prove so the prosecutor charged Trump with crimes that were more likely to result in a conviction.
 
Last edited:
gtyellowjacket said:
If you're really interested if Trump or anyone is guilty of insurrection, read this link from the Marshall project. TLDR, insurrection is very difficult to prove legally. Sedition or seditious conspiracy is probably what you're talking about.

www.themarshallproject.org

A Civilian's Guide to Insurrection Legalese

Sedition. Treason. Conspiracy. They’re all federal crimes, and they’re all being thrown around a lot after the assault on the Capitol. But what exactly do these terms mean?
www.themarshallproject.org www.themarshallproject.org

So why hasn't Trump been charged with seditious conspiracy? That's also very difficult to prove but a lower bar than insurrection. The proud boys and the oath keeper leaders were charged and convicted of seditious conspiracy. I'm guessing Trump wasn't charged probably due to him not meeting the bar of overt acts.

Most of the defendants were charged with lesser crimes like obstruction of an official proceeding of Congress. Trump was charged and indicted for similar crimes and now after a somewhat questionable Supreme Court decision, the charges have been amended but are somewhat similar. So in summary, insurrection and sedition are very difficult to prove so the prosecutor charged Trump with crimes that were more likely to result in a conviction.
Click to expand...
Yes I am aware. Truth is we have a very sick person in a powerful position running amok. He has, I believe, the potential to incite a more serious event than Jan 6. Have you noticed that his speeches now include really weird body gyrations.
 
tarheelbillie said:
Yes I am aware. Truth is we have a very sick person in a powerful position running amok. He has, I believe, the potential to incite a more serious event than Jan 6. Have you noticed that his speeches now include really weird body gyrations.
Click to expand...

I have not noticed. I don't believe I have watched a speech from either candidate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top