- Messages
- 1,501
Cause his sugar daddy thiel tod him to do it?I don’t know why Vance wanted to pursue this in the first place. I guess it’s the thrill of the chaise.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cause his sugar daddy thiel tod him to do it?I don’t know why Vance wanted to pursue this in the first place. I guess it’s the thrill of the chaise.
Anointing Jeb as the guy was head-scratching to me. Why would they think that this country wanted another Bush after what we got the first two times around and the way each of those presidencies were viewed in the 2010s?I think it was "please clap". I think about those early 2016 primaries a lot. Overall, Jeb was a bad, but not necessarily awful, choice to be the anointed GOP frontrunner at the beginning. Jeb had some strengths, but his weaknesses were almost lab-created to exploited by Trump. Trump was a longshot joke up until the point he used Jeb as a punching bag in those early debates.
I will always wonder whether Trumpism would have died in the cradle if the Rs had frontran like a Paul Ryan, or really anyone except Jeb.
I agree. The question I was responding to was "I don’t know why Vance wanted to pursue this in the first place."I think he rightly believed that Vance would do anything he says to do, no matter how illegal or immoral.
Trump is absolutely not thinking about his own death. A narcissist can't envision the world without them in it.
Fair. I'm still learning how to read this board.I agree. The question I was responding to was "I don’t know why Vance wanted to pursue this in the first place."
Trump excels in speaking in generalizations lacking any real information. He would be the person turning in a book or final paper report and getting an F back, where the teacher writes either who, when, how, or why over nearly every sentence, in big red ink.Yeah, I'm trying to figure out what was so objectionable. I will grant that it was not the most concise statement one could imagine. I think it could have been said in half the words, but getting the substance right is the important part.
Here's an example of giving a book report on a book you haven't read:
"Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more." God that was back at the beginning of his term, in 2017. He's been infecting the country with his ignorance for so long it's hard to keep track of.
I really only wrote that sentence as a set up for the punchline. But I suppose it's fair to split my post into sectionals.I agree. The question I was responding to was "I don’t know why Vance wanted to pursue this in the first place."
A white nationalist with alleged links to Russian intel who promoted PizzaGate.Who writes a book praising Pinochet and McCarthy? So weird.