Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Candidates may not campaign on cutting Social Security and Medicare, but those who campaign on “balancing the budget” and “fiscal responsibility” are doing precisely that.I'd be interested in seeing the data excluding Social Security and Medicare. Including those entitlement as "government assistance" means any area with a lot of oldsters gets boosted in the rankings. I haven't heard either party campaign on cutting entitlements and I doubt the recipients view themselves as being on government assistance as much as receiving benefits they've paid for throughout their working careers.
What happened to their boot straps?
I believe all of them see themselves as makers.It's easy to assume many of the people who depend on federal assistance vote for the party that wants to cut that assistance, and I'll make that same assumption that there's probably a lot of that, but many people in these areas who aren't on government assistance vote for the party that will cut that assistance because they see themselves as makers and so many of these people as takers, and they resent them. While these cuts would be disastrous for many of the people receiving the assistance, it would also be detrimental to the economies of these areas, but I get the feeling many of the "makers" would happily accept less overall economic growth if their personal income went up.
No one talks about it because it isn't popular, but many in the government want to cut entitlements, just look at the proposed budgets over the past 8 years.I'd be interested in seeing the data excluding Social Security and Medicare. Including those entitlement as "government assistance" means any area with a lot of oldsters gets boosted in the rankings. I haven't heard either party campaign on cutting entitlements and I doubt the recipients view themselves as being on government assistance as much as receiving benefits they've paid for throughout their working careers.
This is probably the answer. I suspect that statewide it would still be similar but you would see more Urban counties and therefore more blue counties making the list.I'd be interested in seeing the data excluding Social Security and Medicare. Including those entitlement as "government assistance" means any area with a lot of oldsters gets boosted in the rankings. I haven't heard either party campaign on cutting entitlements and I doubt the recipients view themselves as being on government assistance as much as receiving benefits they've paid for throughout their working careers.
Surprised that there are that many blue counties Northeast of Raleigh. Not sure how they can gerrymander that. I know Eastern North Carolina used to be a big Democratic stronghold but don't know why the southeast flipped and the Northeast stayed.
The 2025 Presidential Transition Project that was written by more that two dozen trump administration officials proposes changes to Social Security that would reduce benefits for most people.I'd be interested in seeing the data excluding Social Security and Medicare. Including those entitlement as "government assistance" means any area with a lot of oldsters gets boosted in the rankings. I haven't heard either party campaign on cutting entitlements and I doubt the recipients view themselves as being on government assistance as much as receiving benefits they've paid for throughout their working careers.
Not sure about the northern counties but,This is probably the answer. I suspect that statewide it would still be similar but you would see more Urban counties and therefore more blue counties making the list.
Surprised that there are that many blue counties Northeast of Raleigh. Not sure how they can gerrymander that. I know Eastern North Carolina used to be a big Democratic stronghold but don't know why the southeast flipped and the Northeast stayed.
Is this a joke?I know Eastern North Carolina used to be a big Democratic stronghold but don't know why the southeast flipped and the Northeast stayed.
Most of these are rural counties. I would be willing to bet if you asked most of those "makers" who they resent for taking government assistance the majority would identify urban populations (and maybe specifically urban minorities) not the people around them in their rural counties.It's easy to assume many of the people who depend on federal assistance vote for the party that wants to cut that assistance, and I'll make that same assumption that there's probably a lot of that, but many people in these areas who aren't on government assistance vote for the party that will cut that assistance because they see themselves as makers and so many of these people as takers, and they resent them. While these cuts would be disastrous for many of the people receiving the assistance, it would also be detrimental to the economies of these areas, but I get the feeling many of the "makers" would happily accept less overall economic growth if their personal income went up.
Roads are a great example of a socialist policy in the US that is very popular. Roads in rural areas often cost more to build and serve fewer people. I suspect that most of the highest-cost-per-mile-traveled roads are in rural areas for the benefit of people who oppose government spending and socialism.I believe all of them see themselves as makers.
The right is very short sighted regarding how the government helps the overall welfare and economy.
I recall, when I was conservative, an idea to get the government out of transportation and make all roads toll roads. Just imagine that actually happening and the impact on the poorest people and the economy.
People need to understand where the government money is spent and how it helps people and society in general.
Drive around Eastern North Carolina and marvel at all the non-interstate four lane highways built to make sure all those hog and turkey trucks can roll unimpeded to the processing plants.Roads are a great example of a socialist policy in the US that is very popular. Roads in rural areas often cost more to build and serve fewer people. I suspect that most of the highest-cost-per-mile-traveled roads are in rural areas for the benefit of people who oppose government spending and socialism.