- Messages
- 9,270
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would like it to be the same "panel", if there is one , looks at the other federal Judges
Not the sort of thing that should be controversial or big news, but ...
Justice Kagan calls for a way to enforce Supreme Court ethics code
Justice Elena Kagan suggested Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. could appoint an outside panel of highly respected judges to review allegations of wrongdoing.
the illegitimate justice weighs in...
'Or what?': Experts snap back at Neil Gorsuch after he tells Biden to 'be careful'
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch recently issued a warning to Joe Biden regarding the president's efforts to reform the nation's high court, leading political onlookers to ask, "Or what?" Gorsuch recently pushed back against Biden's recent proposals to restructure the Supreme Court...www.rawstory.com
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch recently issued a warning to Joe Biden regarding the president's efforts to reform the nation's high court, leading political onlookers to ask, "Or what?"
How is he "illegitimate?"the illegitimate justice weighs in...
'Or what?': Experts snap back at Neil Gorsuch after he tells Biden to 'be careful'
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch recently issued a warning to Joe Biden regarding the president's efforts to reform the nation's high court, leading political onlookers to ask, "Or what?" Gorsuch recently pushed back against Biden's recent proposals to restructure the Supreme Court...www.rawstory.com
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch recently issued a warning to Joe Biden regarding the president's efforts to reform the nation's high court, leading political onlookers to ask, "Or what?"
The most insidious delusion the GOP has embraced over the last 10 years is that their anti-democratic acts are justified because Dems would do the same thing if they had the power to do so. It’s an understandable rationalization for people who have long thought of themselves as the “patriotic” party, but are now entirely sold out to a street gang of authoritarians, but it’s a belief that’s entirely divorced from history and modern evidence. The worst thing is that even some Trump haters in the party have bought into this delusion. It’s like the entire party has been infected with RFK’s brain worm.How is he "illegitimate?"
You saying that is EXACTLY like the MAGAs saying that Trump won in 2020.
The rules of the Constitution of the United States of America were followed. No law, rule, etc.. were broken or even compromised.
Just because you don't like the make up of the court and your party doesn't have absolute power like you dream of daily doesn't make him an illegitimate justice. It makes you look petty and small.
I would also like to point out that if given the exact same scenario you would be championing Chuck Schumer for holding on a hearing for a Trump nominated Justice and agreeing whole heartedly with it. You know, "for the sake of democracy."
Love that line coming from a political party that is quick to accuse the GOP of "subverting democracy" but has a nominee that has received absolutely ZERO votes from the American people.
Holding onto President Biden just long enough to make sure that you could coronate the next nominee rather than have a democratically elected one pretty much takes you off the moral high ground.
God help us if you people ever get absolute power in this country.
That sure did take you a lot of words to agree with me. I also see you have no rebuttal at all for saying the entire process was legitimate and most of all, legally done.The most insidious delusion the GOP has embraced over the last 10 years is that their anti-democratic acts are justified because Dems would do the same thing if they had the power to do so. It’s an understandable rationalization for people who have long thought of themselves as the “patriotic” party, but are now entirely sold out to a street gang of authoritarians, but it’s a belief that’s entirely divorced from history and modern evidence. The worst thing is that even some Trump haters in the party have bought into this delusion. It’s like the entire party has been infected with RFK’s brain worm.
That sure did take you a lot of words to agree with me. I also see you have no rebuttal at all for saying the entire process was legitimate and most of all, legally done.
You also make t he asinine claim that the left wouldn't have done the same exact thing. Not sure you were trying to be coy on that or not but you and I, along with anyone with a knowledge of how politics work know full well if the scenario played out that would put a liberal justice on the bench your party would bend every damn rule in the book to make it happen.
Again, for the "sake of democracy" am I right?
If, and most likely when, President Trump is re-elected and has the Senate will you and your party still support expanding the SCOTUS or is that only if your party is in power and you can put the Justices in place that will rule in the way you want them to rule?
Serious question. Your party is saying the court is compromised and needs expanding right? So if the liberal Justices are the only ones that are impartial and the evil Conservative Justices must be put to pasture wouldn't expansion need to happen regardless of who wins in November?
But.. I kid... you and I both know that the Justices aren't impartial. Especially the ones that are on there from the left. Zero chance of them every stepping out of line. It's all about party politics with them.
You can't say that about the evil Conservatives. They have crossed the aisle a hell of a lot more than any liberal Justice would dream of.
No. You can't assume the Dems would have done the same since they haven't done so.That sure did take you a lot of words to agree with me. I also see you have no rebuttal at all for saying the entire process was legitimate and most of all, legally done.
You also make t he asinine claim that the left wouldn't have done the same exact thing. Not sure you were trying to be coy on that or not but you and I, along with anyone with a knowledge of how politics work know full well if the scenario played out that would put a liberal justice on the bench your party would bend every damn rule in the book to make it happen.
Again, for the "sake of democracy" am I right?
If, and most likely when, President Trump is re-elected and has the Senate will you and your party still support expanding the SCOTUS or is that only if your party is in power and you can put the Justices in place that will rule in the way you want them to rule?
Serious question. Your party is saying the court is compromised and needs expanding right? So if the liberal Justices are the only ones that are impartial and the evil Conservative Justices must be put to pasture wouldn't expansion need to happen regardless of who wins in November?
But.. I kid... you and I both know that the Justices aren't impartial. Especially the ones that are on there from the left. Zero chance of them every stepping out of line. It's all about party politics with them.
You can't say that about the evil Conservatives. They have crossed the aisle a hell of a lot more than any liberal Justice would dream of.
I'll take logical fallacies for $500, Alex.You also make t he asinine claim that the left wouldn't have done the same exact thing. Not sure you were trying to be coy on that or not but you and I, along with anyone with a knowledge of how politics work know full well if the scenario played out that would put a liberal justice on the bench your party would bend every damn rule in the book to make it happen.
Step 1: Makes up a completely fictional narrative about what Dems would have done if they had been in the same position as McConnell and the Pubs in 2016.The only "alternative facts" are the ones that the court is somehow "illegitimate" because it is a Conservative Majority.
The left can't stand the facts that they do not have absolute power, do not control the entire judiciary etc...
Imagine if Trump tried to flex on the co-equal branch of government. The outcry on this board alone would be unreal.
But.... since it is a leftwing dominated board anything the left says or does is leaps and bounds better than what the GOP has to offer.
Again... nothing I have posted can be refuted, disproved or proven to be "alternative facts." Facts are facts even if you don't agree with them.
And the facts are the court is legitimate and there is only one party trying to take over a co-equal branch of government and it isn't the GOP.
Just because they are equal branches doesn't mean there isn't oversight. If the oversight shows areas of concern and nothing is done to address those concerns, what you suggest is just not do anything.The only "alternative facts" are the ones that the court is somehow "illegitimate" because it is a Conservative Majority.
The left can't stand the facts that they do not have absolute power, do not control the entire judiciary etc...
Imagine if Trump tried to flex on the co-equal branch of government. The outcry on this board alone would be unreal.
But.... since it is a leftwing dominated board anything the left says or does is leaps and bounds better than what the GOP has to offer.
Again... nothing I have posted can be refuted, disproved or proven to be "alternative facts." Facts are facts even if you don't agree with them.
And the facts are the court is legitimate and there is only one party trying to take over a co-equal branch of government and it isn't the GOP.
Mitch McConnell says hold my beer. The court is this way because of sham Republican maneuvering to stack said court within the confines of the 9 members. They would do it again if the opportunity arises. The court as it’s its comprised is not legitimate secondarily.The only "alternative facts" are the ones that the court is somehow "illegitimate" because it is a Conservative Majority.
The left can't stand the facts that they do not have absolute power, do not control the entire judiciary etc...
Imagine if Trump tried to flex on the co-equal branch of government. The outcry on this board alone would be unreal.
But.... since it is a leftwing dominated board anything the left says or does is leaps and bounds better than what the GOP has to offer.
Again... nothing I have posted can be refuted, disproved or proven to be "alternative facts." Facts are facts even if you don't agree with them.
And the facts are the court is legitimate and there is only one party trying to take over a co-equal branch of government and it isn't the GOP.
LOL....Step 1: Makes up a completely fictional narrative about what Dems would have done if they had been in the same position as McConnell and the Pubs in 2016.
Step 2: “YOU CAN’T REFUTE MY COMPLETELY FICTIONAL HYPOTHETICAL NARRATIVE THAT FLIES IN THE FACE OF 250 YEARS OF US HISTORY!!!”
Definitely a good faith discussion we’re having here.
They don't hide him, they adopt him as their cult leader and bow to his every will.Imagine the GOP hiding a POTUS who is obviously suffering mental deficiencies.....