Tariffs Catch-All | 4-week delays on many Mexico and CDN tariffs

  • Thread starter Thread starter BubbaOtis
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 199
  • Views: 3K
  • Politics 
Sounds like Jack Daniels and Jim Beam is in Rand's ear.

Rand Paul:

US tariffs inevitably bring Canadian, Mexican, and Chinese tariffs which means higher prices for lumber, steel, aluminum and more expensive homes and cars.

Retaliatory tariffs lead to lowered US farm exports, lowered bourbon exports, and less international shipping. Tariffs are taxes and if you tax trade you’ll get less trade and less prosperity.
 
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said she plans to announce retaliatory tariff and non-tariff measures against the U.S. at a rally in Mexico City on Sunday.

“I call on the people of Mexico to face this challenge together,” Sheinbaum said at her daily news conference.

“We will continue to seek dialogue, with reasoning and rationality.”

"There's no motive, reason or justification that supports this decision that will affect our people and nations," Sheinbaum said of the tariffs.

"We will always seek a negotiated solution, in a framework of respect."

 
Target and Best Buy CEOs both on tv today saying "Oh yeah, we are for sure passing these costs on to the consumer..."
 
Someone should give Trump a list of the countries who have the highest tariffs, and ask if that is how he wants the US economy to look.

This craziness will continue until China or another country whacks US agriculture (like China did in 2017). That makes these shenanigans too painful for Trump in his Tariff Reality Show Game which keeps him on
TV and diverts from the illegal or cruel stuff going on
Do these other countries have big, beautiful tariffs, or the other kind?
 
Well, technically the importer pays the tax, and if the importer is French, then it will be a French company paying it to the Treasury.

And then the price will rise and consumers will end up paying. I suspect that Trump only listened to the part about France paying it into the Treasury and just ran with that. Short attention span and all that.
If it is so terrible for the US to imposed tariffs (especially reciprocal tariffs) on imports into our country and it only increases the cost to American consumers, then why does it seem so popular to all the countries who tariff the shit out of our exports to them? Why does it not make American goods unaffordable to their consumers?
 
Pretty good primer on how the fundamentals are different now than in 2018 when Trump launched a more targeted set of tariffs that were mostly absorbed by the market:

GIFT LINK 🎁 —> How to Think About Trump Tariffs and the Stock Market

IMG_5363.jpeg

“… Surely, though, Trump will soften or remove levies if they hit stocks and pinch household budgets? And then trade partners will remove their countermeasures—right?

That is possible, and even likely, but lots of damage has been done.

The unusually chaotic nature of economic policymaking might be great for TV ratings, but it has helped send a global index of policy uncertainty to its highest level ever, exceeding the peak of the Covid-19 panic. That disrupts all sorts of investment and hiring plans.

Trump is almost certain to extend his 2017 tax cuts after they expire this year. They are no longer reductions, though, and their renewal has been baked in to profit assumptions since he won re-election in November in a Republican sweep.

Another difference from 2019 is that, even after their recent wobble, the S&P 500 is about 20% more expensive today than the end of that year on a cyclically adjusted basis. …”
 
If it is so terrible for the US to imposed tariffs (especially reciprocal tariffs) on imports into our country and it only increases the cost to American consumers, then why does it seem so popular to all the countries who tariff the shit out of our exports to them? Why does it not make American goods unaffordable to their consumers?
Name those countries. You will find your answer. Spoiler alert: they don't exist, or are too small for anyone to care about.

In the 1960s and 70s, most of Latin America pursued Trump's economic policy: high tariffs to promote an economy in which most or all production was done domestically. When Trump tweets out, "American farmers, be ready to sell your goods INSIDE the US" he's channeling Juan Peron of Argentina. This was called "import substitution" policy. At the same time, countries like South Korea and Japan were pursuing a different policy, called export-led growth.

One reason that we have so much confidence about the effects of tariffs was the outcome of that natural experiment. All of Latin America ended up bankrupt (and almost took down storied US banks), whereas South Korea and Japan prospered.

Trump's entire domestic agenda -- socially, economically, and politically -- is mostly a reprise of Peronism, that disastrous ideology that caused Argentina to go from one of the wealthiest countries in the world to one that defaults on its debt every ten years or so. The difference is that Peron was a friend to labor, whereas Trump is an enemy.

I can also explain how tariff levels are set, and why they are the way they are, and why you might think that other countries tariff the shit out of our exports when that's not generally true. But I'm not going to without some indication that you care to learn. If you engage constructively, you can get an answer. Of course, you could also google or ask chatgpt.
 
Back
Top