Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Trump / Musk (other than DOGE)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 12K
  • Views: 617K
  • Politics 
Ugly and old both times.

Albeit, uglier and older in the 2nd photo.
Time catches up to us all, I just thought the difference was striking in that presser — I suspect he had a professional hair and makeup artist on Inauguration Day 2025, BTW, and now is back to doing it himself (his preference). He looked a lot better for Inauguration 2025 (in part perhaps because it looks like they convinced him to wear a toupee) than he did for the briefing, which is what led me to seek out a photo from inauguration 2017. The sunken cheeks since then is quite striking (even if inevitable for just about everyone pressing 80).

As long as I am shallowly focusing on matters of appearance, the high angle of the camera in the briefing room is not a friend to his diminishing hair up top (still more than most men his age, but something I guarantee he is aware of because he complained about the camera placement the first go round as POTUS).
 
Last edited:
Federal employees inbox, where you can see the Klipperstein email, and a bunch of others.

signal-2025-01-31-004115_002.jpeg
I read about this blunder last night. Way to get the entire Federal Government spammed, Elon & Co.

On a related note:

IMG_4788.jpeg

“…
A federal source told Straight Arrow News that the emails were suspicious because they were formatted differently than usual mass emails, and they came directly from OPM; normally, departments take messages from OPM and relay them to their employees.

An employee posted in a Reddit thread for federal workers that a new email server was connected to OPM’s servers, which he believed was being used to build lists of all federal employees to generate massive reduction in force (RIF) notices.

A report in FedScoop.com revealed a lawsuit was filed against OPM for the use of the server. The suit said the servers were being used to store information without conducting the required privacy impact assessment.

The two anonymous employees who filed the suit want the government to stop using it until the proper tests have been conducted. ….”

 


A reminder that a major goal of the immigrant bluster by Homan and Trump and others is to induce “self-deportation”.
 

No congressional leader is more at risk of getting caught in the crossfire of Donald Trump’s coming trade wars than Senate Majority Leader John Thune.

Trump said Thursday he’s ready to slap sweeping 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico as soon as Saturday, which will force the South Dakota Republican to decide whether he will use his leadership perch to push back on a tactic that has given him and other agriculture-state GOP lawmakers heartburn or align himself with a burgeoning bloc of MAGA-tinged protectionists in Congress.

Thune knows the stakes all too well: Retaliatory tariffs during Trump’s 2018 trade war with China crippled South Dakota’s agriculture-dependent economy — which relies on the billions of dollars worth of soybeans, corn, beef and other agricultural products it exports abroad every year, plus more in manufactured goods.


Farmers there are still reeling from their losses, and a standoff with Mexico and Canada — which are now American farmers’ two largest export markets — would be devastating. U.S. agricultural exports to Mexico are expected to reach $29.9 billion this fiscal year and a record-high $29.2 billion to Canada, with China further behind, according to the Agriculture Department.

Other farm-state lawmakers and the agriculture industry are quietly counting on Thune to push back against Trump charging into another wave of catastrophic trade wars. But that’s a tall order.
 


WSJ has dedicated a significant amount of effort to getting Trump to back down on tariffs.

IMG_4790.jpeg
“…
The Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of inflation showed that consumer prices rose 2.4% in November over a year earlier. A 25% tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico would bring the inflation rate up to about 3%, keeping it well above the Fed’s 2% target, according to Capital Economics, an analysis firm.

Additional tariffs on China or others would cause a bigger increase, the firm said.

The Trump administration has played down the risk of inflation and said that higher tariffs would bring more revenue to federal coffers. …”
 
Has Trump ever admitted that tariffs can cause higher prices for Americans? If not, then maybe someone should ask why he won't put tariffs on oil?
 
Has Trump ever admitted that tariffs can cause higher prices for Americans? If not, then maybe someone should ask why he won't put tariffs on oil?
I admire your optimism but when Trump says literally anything he wants and defends it with his “common sense,” I don’t think asking him questions is likely to be effective.
 


“In famine-stricken Sudan, soup kitchens that feed hundreds of thousands of civilians trapped in a war zone have shut down.

In Thailand, war refugees with life-threatening diseases have been turned away by hospitals and carted off on makeshift stretchers.

In Ukraine, residents on the frontline of the war with Russia may be going without firewood in the middle of winter.

Some of the world’s most vulnerable populations are already feeling President Trump’s sudden cutoff of billions of dollars in American aid that helps fend off starvation, treats diseases and provides shelter for the displaced. …

“It feels like one easy decision by the U.S. president is quietly killing so many lives,” said Saw Nah Pha, a tuberculosis patient who said he was told to leave a U.S.-funded hospital in the Mae La refugee camp, the largest refugee camp on the Thai-Myanmar border.

Mr. Nah Pha, who fled Myanmar in 2007 to escape the fighting there, said the staff gave him a week’s supply of medicine and told him that was all they could provide. “Once my medicine runs out, I have nowhere else to get it,” he added. …”

——
Trump’s inability to understand soft power is maddening. He doesn’t even have to have empathy to merely cynically grasp the value of these U.S. programs.
 
“… In Cambodia, which had been on the cusp of eradicating malaria with the help of the United States, officials now worry that a halt in funding will set them back. In Nepal, a $72 million program to reduce malnutrition has been suspended. In South Africa and Haiti, officials and aid workers worry that hundreds of thousands of people could die if the Trump administration withdraws support for a signature American program to fight H.I.V. and AIDS.

Some programs that don’t fit the category of lifesaving aid remain frozen, while others are explicitly barred because they fall outside of the administration’s ideological bounds, including any help with abortions, gender or diversity issues.

The United Nations Population Fund, the U.N.’s sexual and reproductive health agency, said that because of the funding freeze, maternal and mental health services to millions of women in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Gaza, Ukraine, and other places had been disrupted or eliminated. In Afghanistan, where the Taliban has banned women from working, 1,700 Afghan women who worked for the agency would no longer be employed.

At stake is not just the good will that the United States has built internationally, but also its work to promote America’s security interests. In Ivory Coast, an American-sponsored program collecting sensitive intelligence on Al Qaeda-related incidents has been interrupted.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, some of the funding to United Nations agencies supporting more than 4.5 million people displaced by a rapidly growing conflict in the country’s east has been frozen, according to a U.S. humanitarian official on the continent.

Even with Mr. Rubio’s announcements that lifesaving efforts could resume, much of the American aid system in Africa remained paralyzed by the confusion and disruptions, including in conflict-hit areas where every day counts. …”
 
“… David A. Lebryk, who served in nonpolitical roles at Treasury for several decades, is expected to leave the agency soon, the people said. President Donald Trump named Lebryk as acting secretary upon taking office last week. Lebryk had a dispute with Musk’s surrogates over access to the payment system the U.S. government uses to disburse trillions of dollars every year, the people said. The exact nature of the disagreement was not immediately clear, they said.

Officials affiliated with Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” have been asking since after the election for access to the system, the people said — requests that were reiterated more recently, including after Trump’s inauguration.

… Typically only a small number of career officials control Treasury’s payment systems. Run by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, the sensitive systems control the flow of more than $6 trillion annually to households, businesses and more nationwide. Tens, if not hundreds, of millions of people across the country rely on the systems, which are responsible for distributing Social Security and Medicare benefits, salaries for federal personnel, payments to government contractors and grant recipients and tax refunds, among tens of thousands of other functions.

… Musk has sought to exert sweeping control over the inner workings of the U.S. government, installing longtime surrogates at several agencies, including the Office of Personnel Management, which essentially handles federal human resources, and the General Services Administration, which manages real estate. (Musk was seen on Thursday visiting GSA, according to two other people familiar with his whereabouts, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal matters. That visit was first reported by the New York Times.) His Department of Government Efficiency, originally conceived as a nongovernmental panel, has since replaced the U.S. Digital Service.

… Still, the possibility that government officials might try to use the federal payments system — which essentially functions as the nation’s “checking book” — to enact a political agenda is unprecedented, said Mark Mazur, who served in senior treasury roles during the Obama and Biden administrations. …”

——
It would be hard to overstate how much mischief could be done by someone of bad faith (or merely misguided or incompetent) getting access to this system.
 
Continued

“…
In the 2023 fiscal year, the payment systems processed nearly 1.3 billion payments, accounting for about $5.4 trillion, nearly 97 percent made electronically, according to the Treasury Department. Every payment was made on time.

Lebryk’s departure is expected to be a shock to Treasury personnel, among whom he enjoys a sterling reputation. The lifelong bureaucrat joined the department as an intern in 1989 and spent three decades at the agency under 11 different treasury secretaries, serving as acting director of the U.S. Mint and commissioner of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, among other roles.

Michael Faulkender, whom Trump nominated as deputy U.S. treasury secretary in December, praised Lebryk’s work in 2023. …”
 
Back
Top