Callatoroy
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 1,908
I thought he was buddies with Stern.That’s not a bad question (although it wasn’t directed at me.)
I have loathed the man since I lived in NY in the early 80’s and he was pretty much a joke around the city (he was a foil for Howard Stern and Grayson Carter was dubbing him a “short-fingered vulgarian.”) The notion that this buffoon would someday be serious political figure was (and still is) absurd.
His agenda is cruelty. His primary goal seems to be to annoy and frustrate people who disagree with him. He appoints people who are wholly unfit for their jobs. He is bent on destroying the institutions and systems that make our government work because they stand between him and his goal of using his position to personally enrich himself. He derailed a bipartisan immigration bill for political expediency. He doesn’t want immigration reform, he wants immigration elimination (or at least he did until Elon Musk, another wholly despicable human being, convinced him that bringing in substantially more degreed tech workers without typical workplace safeguards and professional mobility would be beneficial to Musk and his buddies.) Remember when he was going to introduce his replacement plan for Obamacare? How about when he was going to release his tax returns as soon as his audit was completed? Now he has a hare-brained idea that tariffs are the solution to all the economic problems of the country.
In other words I hate his lack of agenda, he just has a jigsaw puzzle of unconnected dots that he hopes somebody smarter than him can develop into policy. His agenda is grievance and retribution. Gulf of America? His agenda is trolling.
I hope that one day you figure it out like so many other conservatives/former Republicans who post here have done over the past ten years.
I see it somewhat differently than you. I don't think his agenda is cruelty for the sake of cruelty. I think he is by personality a somewhat cruel person. What 70 year old mocks a disabled person? That isn't a calculated thing, its who he is.
I don't think he is intent on destroying the institutions and systems in our g'ment. I think he thinks like a business man and his default is to look for efficiency gains and to streamline. That is usually my go to line of thinking. I think for the most part he isn't chasing money any longer. He will get richer but in his position you would almost have to try not to, from keeping his net worth from increasing. I think his vanity is driving him to chase "greatness" in the eyes of his voters. He needs constant validation. He knows his position but that isn't enough. He has to have it continually reaffirmed by others. I don't see him as nearly the racist most of you do. I think he again wants to be perceived as great by blacks and latinos. Trump has struck a chord with people who are fed up with political speech / PC / coach speak / etc. Common sense resonates with people and him saying he signed an executive order that the official stance of the fed g'ment on gender is male and female got him more points than anything else he did yesterday. What professional politician is going to say that much less issue a freakin executive order. Can you imagine?
I think he derailed the immigration for two reasons. 1. Vanity - he wanted it done on his watch. 2. I think he thought it was truly a bad bill. I'm not saying it was more of 2 than 1. Just that those were the reasons.