Trump / Musk (other than DOGE) Omnibus Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 11K
  • Views: 304K
  • Politics 
Glad to hear you appreciate some of the concerns about Hegseth.

I'd be interested to know, though - what makes you think our military needs a "culture change" and what specific changes do you want Trump and Hegseth can bring? (Leaving aside whether Hegseth can actually successfully implement culture change, which I seriously doubt.)
DEI

The leaders of the most powerful military in the history of the world don’t agree that DEI is destroying the military, but right-wing talking heads with zero experience in or knowledge of the inner-workings of military said it is, so you do you think MAGA is going to trust?
 
Fair points of concern. I agree with your earlier statement (I think it was you) that Hegseth, after a year or so on the job, may be viewed as a spectacular success or failure. - he’s that much of a wildcard. This pick could work out really well or really not so well.
I mean, if you were looking to hire an associate, and you got an application from a woman with seven children from three different fathers and a history of fiscal mismanagement and alcohol abuse, would you even let her in the door?
 
Cont'd

"...In an exchange with Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell of Oregon on President-elect Donald Trump’s proposed trade policies, Scott Bessent, Trump’s pick to helm the Treasury Department, pointed to the glut of cheap Chinese good flooding the world as an argument for hefty tariffs.

... “Clearly, what has happened is trade has not been fair and that has fallen on the American worker, and we cannot allow that,” Bessent told the Senate Finance Committee as part of his confirmation hearing for the top Treasury post.

China is the most unbalanced economy in the history of the world. They are in a severe recession-slash-depression. ... They are attempting to export their way out of that,” he added. Bessent said, “We cannot allow a player like this flood our markets.”

For context: China’s economy has indeed slowed in recent years as consumers cut their spending and prices fell, key markers of a recession. But its economy has not technically contracted just yet. The Chinese economy expanded at an annual rate of 4.6% in the third quarter, according to the country’s statistics agency. ... Still, some economists have cast doubt on the accuracy of China’s official economic figures, largely due to local officials falsifying data, which the government has taken steps to address. Former Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke has also pointed to the lack of transparency of China’s statistics agency."
Of course he's right that China is flooding the world with cheap exports, in the USA especially via crap merch from Temu and Shein, etc. I suspect there will be a lot of early tariff targeting at the de minimis exception and cheap consumer goods.
 
In all honesty you guys wouldn't know truth if it hit you in the ass because you never step outside the world of the View and maddow. At least I know when fox news is lying.
Whats up with this ridiculous assertion that everyone who leans left watches MSNBC? I honestly don't know anyone personally who does. I do know a ton who watch Newsmax, Fox News, and OAN all the time...but even so i don't assume that every Trump voters does that.
 
Whats up with this ridiculous assertion that everyone who leans left watches MSNBC? I honestly don't know anyone personally who does. I do know a ton who watch Newsmax, Fox News, and OAN all the time...but even so i don't assume that every Trump voters does that.
And on top of that, who actually watches the View? I mean there are clearly people who watch it, but it doesn't even ping my radar as a political show. At least accusing us of watching MCNBC makes some level of sense.
 
Point made.

You are way to involved in the political climate of this country.

You always have been.

Tell me this... How many rights did Trump 45 take from you or anyone you know?

How did he change this country into a "fascists state?"

Did he take away the right for gay marriage? Women to vote?

No... you like to make a huge issue out of a person that you disagree with and scream that the world is ending. It didn't 45 years ago when Reagan was elected and the same group of "intellectuals" were saying the same damn thing.

The schtick is old. Get over it. Your party lost. If you have mental issues, emotional issues over a damn election then I'd suggest you stay off of public boards that offer differing opinions.

Sorry.. thems the facts jack.
Guess you missed the latest where republicans are trying, again, to repeal gay marriage.

Also, 45 had guard rails. Notice most of those people came out against him in the campaign. He is putting nothing but yes men/women into leadership roles this term and he doesn't need to worry about another election, so we will see if this term parallels the first term in anyway.

I hope that in 4 years we can look back and say it didn't turn out like we feared. Guess we will see.
 
The guy in charge of his detail? Yikes. I thought the people on his detail should all have been reassigned to lower profile protectees.
Why, that incident seems to have been a positive for him. It almost makes the conspiracy nuts, saying it was staged, seem credible.
 
In all honesty you guys wouldn't know truth if it hit you in the ass because you never step outside the world of the View and maddow. At least I know when fox news is lying.
It's pretty easy with fox, like trump, the only lie.

I've basically stopped watching TV news.
 
Last edited:
DOGE committee is eyeing federal diversity programs, mostly minority set asides for federal contracts. I think there may be some savings as the contracts are open to a wider pool of competition, but this is mostly about ending race and probably gender based favoritism. I approve of ending the racially biased contracting. I don't think they should end empowerment zones.

 
Other DOGE news. Federal employees are editing their job profiles to remove mentions of policy and diversity. Probably smart of them. I think it speaks to the Herculean task of paring down a government bureaucracy without cutting too many valuable government services. Its a lot easier to search for keywords than it is to understand what each role in the agency does.

 
DOGE committee is eyeing federal diversity programs, mostly minority set asides for federal contracts. I think there may be some savings as the contracts are open to a wider pool of competition, but this is mostly about ending race and probably gender based favoritism. I approve of ending the racially biased contracting. I don't think they should end empowerment zones.



It’s about DEI not budget savings.

The end of support for women and minority owned businesses in government contracting was very much intended as a response to actual racial and gender bias in government contracting decisions. Is it still necessary? My guess is that among the folks implementing the change in the incoming administration, the result will just be to return to good old days racial and gender bias in contracting decisions and call that neutral/fair.

But maybe the decades of actively giving women and minority owned businesses a shot has had time to build enough businesses that the program is not needed anymore. Unfortunately I don’t trust the Trump Admin to conduct an honest test of such a proposition. But I guess we will find out.

I very much doubt that ending such programs will create any meaningful cost savings by creating some larger pool of contractors though. In most cases, the minority/gender support only kicks in if there are multiple contract bids that are competitive.

But there are small business set-asides for licensed minority and women owned companies certified by SBA — accounting for 5% of government contracts available to small businesses (which excludes most big ticket stuff, like Military and law enforcement equipment). SBA 8a contracting opportunities aren’t just based on race and gender, though, they support small businesses owned by any person facing social disadvantages or disabilities.

The Federal Government also requires that 23% of all government contracts go to small businesses, btw, and the 5% set-aside is a subset of the 23% (so, if there are 100 government contracts that year, 23 of them must go to small business and then 5% of the 23 small business set aside contracts (so one of them) must go to certified minority owned businesses. The competition for those set asides IS pretty low because there are relatively few businesses so certified by the SBA and they span across a lot of services and service areas.

The most successful 8a small business are the ones that develop relationships with large government contractors who include the 8a business as a subcontractor to demonstrate that the big contract also helps satisfy government policy to support disadvantaged business. The prime contractor does most of the government contractor heavy lifting on the bid process and the disadvantaged business gets a shot to go along for the ride as a subcontractor.
 
Last edited:
Why, that incident seems to have been a positive for him. It almost makes the conspiracy nuts, saying it was staged, seem credible.
The director of the Service took the heat and resigned, but she sure as hell wasn’t involved in the day-to-day logistics of protecting Trump. That was the responsibility of the guy Trump wants to put in charge of the whole agency. It’s ridiculous to give full organizational oversight to the guy in charge of the biggest agency failure in decades. He had ONE job- protecting Donald Trump. If he wasn’t confident in the security of the site, he shouldn’t have let Trump go out there.
 
Back
Top