UNC to cut 70 mill

mpaer

Inconceivable Member
ZZL Supporter
Messages
2,714
Dear Carolina Community,

Given recent research funding reductions and budget cuts that have been proposed at both the state and federal levels across all higher education institutions, we are taking steps to identify operational savings across the University.

Our leadership team is taking a thoughtful and targeted approach, looking into areas that can be streamlined for greater efficiency, strengthening our operations while meeting our fiduciary responsibility to the people of North Carolina. We have identified savings of approximately $70 million (about 2% of our total operational budget), and including up to $29.5 million in savings this fiscal year. Each of these decisions comes with true costs, yet we believe that this measured approach will enable us to continue to pursue our goal of becoming the best public university in the country.

We have grouped areas of impact, focusing on organizational effectiveness, academic prioritization and putting North Carolina’s residents first.

Organizational Effectiveness​

  • Savings identified: $38 million
  • Leaders from units such as Athletics, Student Success, The Graduate School and the NC Collaboratory are hard at work identifying ways to find savings. We are grateful to them for their partnership.
  • Spending will be significantly reduced in procurement and catering.
  • Diving deeper into our ServiceFirst effort, we are looking to consolidate roles and resources across human resources, IT, finance, communications and research administration. This will result in administrative staff reductions.
  • Additionally, we will eliminate vacant roles and associated costs, institute a faculty retirement incentive program and seek operational energy savings through system replacements and upgrades.

Academic Prioritization​

  • Savings identified: $14 million
  • In partnership with Centers and Institutes, we will implement a process to find savings by identifying operational efficiencies, similar to the work we are doing with unit leaders.
  • We are evaluating academic programs with low enrollment and waning interest. This evaluation occurs on an annual basis but must be more rigorous in times like this.
  • We will phase out the Elevate program by the end of FY31.

North Carolinians First​

  • Savings identified: $17 million
  • We will continue to prioritize enrollment for North Carolina residents by reducing our financial aid for out-of-state students from 44% to 18% of overall support aligned with the same limits on non-resident enrollment, as mandated by the Board of Governors. Incoming first-year and current undergraduate students will not be affected. Crucial support like the Carolina Covenant and many of our other scholarship programs will not be affected.
We recognize that it is not easy to receive this kind of news. These are difficult choices and there are many different opinions on what is mission-critical and what is not. Behind every budget decision are real people who feel the impact in deeply personal ways, which is why we are working hard to find savings in as many areas as possible before a reduction in staffing. We appreciate your patience and feedback as we work across this complex organization to identify greater detail.

We are presenting the proposed budget savings to the Board of Trustees during the Budget, Finance and Infrastructure Committee session today, which will be available on the Board website. We are committed to transparency and regular communication throughout this process, and collaboration with leaders across campus, especially in areas of academic shared governance.

In addition, we will begin a Chancellor’s Forum series designed to keep you updated throughout this process. We will provide details on the first forum session soon. In the meantime, you can submit questions to the following email address: budgetquestions@unc.edu. Your submissions will guide our Forum agenda and the information we intend to provide in a timely manner.

Sincerely,

Lee H. Roberts
Chancellor

James W. Dean, Jr.
Interim Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost

Nate Knuffman
Vice Chancellor for Finance and Operations

 
Dear Carolina Community,

Given recent research funding reductions and budget cuts that have been proposed at both the state and federal levels across all higher education institutions, we are taking steps to identify operational savings across the University.

Our leadership team is taking a thoughtful and targeted approach, looking into areas that can be streamlined for greater efficiency, strengthening our operations while meeting our fiduciary responsibility to the people of North Carolina. We have identified savings of approximately $70 million (about 2% of our total operational budget), and including up to $29.5 million in savings this fiscal year. Each of these decisions comes with true costs, yet we believe that this measured approach will enable us to continue to pursue our goal of becoming the best public university in the country.

We have grouped areas of impact, focusing on organizational effectiveness, academic prioritization and putting North Carolina’s residents first.

Organizational Effectiveness​

  • Savings identified: $38 million
  • Leaders from units such as Athletics, Student Success, The Graduate School and the NC Collaboratory are hard at work identifying ways to find savings. We are grateful to them for their partnership.
  • Spending will be significantly reduced in procurement and catering.
  • Diving deeper into our ServiceFirst effort, we are looking to consolidate roles and resources across human resources, IT, finance, communications and research administration. This will result in administrative staff reductions.
  • Additionally, we will eliminate vacant roles and associated costs, institute a faculty retirement incentive program and seek operational energy savings through system replacements and upgrades.

Academic Prioritization​

  • Savings identified: $14 million
  • In partnership with Centers and Institutes, we will implement a process to find savings by identifying operational efficiencies, similar to the work we are doing with unit leaders.
  • We are evaluating academic programs with low enrollment and waning interest. This evaluation occurs on an annual basis but must be more rigorous in times like this.
  • We will phase out the Elevate program by the end of FY31.

North Carolinians First​

  • Savings identified: $17 million
  • We will continue to prioritize enrollment for North Carolina residents by reducing our financial aid for out-of-state students from 44% to 18% of overall support aligned with the same limits on non-resident enrollment, as mandated by the Board of Governors. Incoming first-year and current undergraduate students will not be affected. Crucial support like the Carolina Covenant and many of our other scholarship programs will not be affected.
We recognize that it is not easy to receive this kind of news. These are difficult choices and there are many different opinions on what is mission-critical and what is not. Behind every budget decision are real people who feel the impact in deeply personal ways, which is why we are working hard to find savings in as many areas as possible before a reduction in staffing. We appreciate your patience and feedback as we work across this complex organization to identify greater detail.

We are presenting the proposed budget savings to the Board of Trustees during the Budget, Finance and Infrastructure Committee session today, which will be available on the Board website. We are committed to transparency and regular communication throughout this process, and collaboration with leaders across campus, especially in areas of academic shared governance.

In addition, we will begin a Chancellor’s Forum series designed to keep you updated throughout this process. We will provide details on the first forum session soon. In the meantime, you can submit questions to the following email address: budgetquestions@unc.edu. Your submissions will guide our Forum agenda and the information we intend to provide in a timely manner.

Sincerely,

Lee H. Roberts
Chancellor

James W. Dean, Jr.
Interim Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost

Nate Knuffman
Vice Chancellor for Finance and Operations

Thanks donbosco
I assume the Elevate program was some nasty DEI thing where they helped kids from disadvantaged backgrounds
 
Anytime reviews of low enrollment academic programs are mentioned, my Spidey sense goes off. IMO, this means Roberts and other conservative leaders have their eyes on certain humanities and social science programs that are associated with "diversity."

Other points in the letter are also quite worrisome, but that is the one that leapt out to me first.
 
Anytime reviews of low enrollment academic programs are mentioned, my Spidey sense goes off. IMO, this means Roberts and other conservative leaders have their eyes on certain humanities and social science programs that are associated with "diversity."

Other points in the letter are also quite worrisome, but that is the one that leapt out to me first.


Philosophy beware...
 
Anytime reviews of low enrollment academic programs are mentioned, my Spidey sense goes off. IMO, this means Roberts and other conservative leaders have their eyes on certain humanities and social science programs that are associated with "diversity."

Other points in the letter are also quite worrisome, but that is the one that leapt out to me first.


And every program ending in the word: STUDIES.
 
I was a philosophy major at Carolina. Stopped by Caldwell on a recent visit, it was a Sunday and nobody was there but of course it was open. I poked around a little bit. I direct my annual $100 contribution to UNC to go to the philosophy department, but I doubt that's enough to keep it afloat if the shit really hits the fan...
 
I was a philosophy major at Carolina. Stopped by Caldwell on a recent visit, it was a Sunday and nobody was there but of course it was open. I poked around a little bit. I direct my annual $100 contribution to UNC to go to the philosophy department, but I doubt that's enough to keep it afloat if the shit really hits the fan...
It is nasty to teach people about critical thinking.............
 
Not much in this link
The most significant thing is that it appears they mumble something about Federal cuts-but this I think also is just Lee Roberts being a good little Pub
Consolidate certain Admin functions
Drsatically cut Student Aid to out of State students
Financial incentives for Faculty Retirement

Not much in this link
The most significant thing is that it appears they mumble something about Federal cuts-but this I think also is just Lee Roberts being a good little Pub
Consolidate certain Admin functions
Drsatically cut Student Aid to out of State students
Financial incentives for Faculty Retirement
I didn't realize we give a lot of student aid to out of state students. I know we limit our acceptance of out of state students to around 18% and twice as many out of state students apply as in state students and they have superior academic records . Moreover, out of state tuition is less than 35k and so how many of those applicants are really hoping/needing student aid ?

Is it possible this cut is designed to discourage out of state applicants ?

I've been day drinking since 7am so I may be missing the boat. Someone explain the rationale for cutting out of state student aid
 
Last edited:
I didn't realize we give a lot of student aid to out of state students. I know we limit our acceptance of out of state students to around 18% and twice as many out of students apply as in state students who have superior academic records . Moreover, out of state tuition is less than 35k and how many of those applicants are really hoping for student aid ?

Is it possible this cut is designed to discourage out of state applicants ?

I've been day drinking since 7am so I may be missing the boat. Someone explain the rationale for cutting out of state student aid
Th rational is in large part old fashion competition It is harder than 40 hells to get accepted out of State. These are unreal good students . We want to attract them-and that requires Financial aid to be competitive for a lot of them
 
Yea
And last year Athletics received 14 mill in "Institutional support "
how much went to football that didn't come from student athletic fees (free tickets)? And would it have been any different if the coach made less from the educational foundation.

I would appreciate a link to your amounts. Not to dispute what you said, just interest in the accounting.

In the past the accounting for this stuff is strange, like charging the football program rent for fields and facilities that have few other uses. Not saying that is the case here, but i would love to look at the updated numbers again
 
Last edited:
how much went to football that didn't come from student athletic fees (free tickets)?
chris I get it Athletics makes a lot of money-I practically worship the Rams Clubs -My point is the greater Univ nows gives athletics double digit millions "Institutional support" Athletics is not self sufficient any longer
Not a good look when we are cutting Academics
 
Back
Top