Recent content by akillesheel

this was a foregone conclusion to everybody except for the people carrying Belichick's water. i don't think it means anything other than that Baker realized this season that he was never going to see the field in Chapel Hill unless we had a different HC. the only thing interesting about it is...

on the article titled "latest football offseason scoop" from a few weeks ago. the section on Bryce Baker notes that it appears the staff doesn't think much of him but hasn't been trying to push him out... "And, when speaking to sources close to the situation, they indicate he’s happy in Chapel...

i can assure you that poor kids know that they're poor. if my kids were to know that it was their parents giving them gifts, i could feel comfortable knowing that it was in my power as a parent to tell them that not everybody has the same kind of fortune they do as far as family and comfort...

Bryce Baker to the portal, somewhat contradicting that IC report that he was happy in Chapel Hill.

query who/what would be a bridge too far if you can so easily make excuses for what we have already.

legally both situations qualify as sexual assault. IIRC felton was lying to women about using protection, so if we're allowing for personal subjectivity, that might not have been "actual" sexual assault, either.

my two big issues with the Santa story are: a) the class dynamics that Bigs23 brought up; I would never want my kids thinking that Santa liked them better than their less fortunate classmates (or worse, making those less fortunate classmates feel that they were disfavored) b) the fact that it...

even if you believe this, the way to "not give up on him" would have been in supporting him in finding somewhere else to play basketball. make the case to other coaches that he learned what he did was wrong and is ready for a second chance. keeping him on the same campus as the woman he...

you will almost never find a football coach who is willing to say a bad word about any other coach they've worked with or even, in most cases, heard of. it's a tight-knit fraternity of a profession, to the point where it's a detriment to the sport because the same guys keep failing upwards just...

again, there is no reasonable discussion with somebody who is starting from a premise that is just blatantly incorrect, and even more so when that wrongness comes from bigotry. and a group of people being correct about something is not an "echo chamber."

the problem that teams have with drafting older players (at least high, like in the lottery) isn't some kind of "stigma," it's a worry that a 22-year old is going to be physically more mature than most of the college opposition he faces and thus his numbers might be juiced in a way that won't be...

this is the problem with liberalism. a perspective that relies on a racist, faulty premise and hopes to achieve a blatantly illegal (not to mention immoral!) outcome is not "needed on our board" just because it doesn't align with that of the posters with a foot in reality. the Golden Mean...

yeah aside from the completely made up numbers, i'm still not getting how that's "backwards." maybe you don't realize what you're saying, but if adding people from other countries is the united states going "backwards," it is hard to imagine what "forwards" would be other than a white ethnostate.

define "backwards," because without context, we're veering awful close to Great Replacement, actual Nazi-style talk.

ok then why remove the photo??