Recent content by finesse

I also seem to recall that the Dems did take a dim view of Trump having him killed. Am I mistaken? This is more what I remember. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/democrats-demand-answers-soleimani-killing-not-game-n1110591

I meant more in the lines of a targeted assassination of a foreign leader.

The shooting down of Yamamoto during WWII has been cited as a precedent. I have little doubt that there were earlier, smaller and perhaps much more ad hoc attempts.

And your mind, your tiny mind You know you've really been so blind Now's your time, burn your mind You’ve fallen far, too far behind Oh no, oh no, oh no! You're gonna burn!

Saw regular unleaded in Carrboro for 2.63 today Most places around me are around 2.90.

Yes. He's a triple threat. He's up there in hypocrisy and self delusion as well. Top fifty of any part of the human race or even top twenty ain't all that, anyway.

He's a blatherskite, pure and simple. He should be labeled "For entertainment use only". Yes ,it's okay to assume the same implied hypocrisy.

The main issue is that sort of thing is necessary to protect them from Trump's political grandstanding and his willingness to use them for his own selfish purposes. Why don't you see the issue?

Because it's a damned good idea for the sake of soldiers ,real Americans in general and Democrats in particular. If it galls Trump's ass as well, that's just a bonus. You can use some moisturizing cream before you kiss it.

Or real things.

"No static at all"

You help me to never take the day too seriously. I don't know if your inanity or insanity is more ridiculous but after a few of your posts I'm prepared for any fool I meet IRL.