You said the majority were the trash people. That means there was a minority who were not NN/WS. Those are the people he was referring to. Again, he specifically said he wasn't talking about the NN/WS. Even if he was completely wrong, and every single person there was NN/WS, he still wasn't...
There are people there to protest the tearing down of statues. They aren't responsible for the trash that is there with them.
I don't blame the 99.9% of peaceful BLM protesters because there's .1% violent, destructive troublemakers.
Your opinion of people who don't want to tear down statues is irrelevant to the fact that Trump literally clarified who he was/wasn't talking about and he was NOT talking about neo-nazis or white supremacists, which he specifically said.
REPORTER: The neo-Nazis started this thing. They showed up in Charlottesville.
TRUMP: Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse...
If you're talking about the "you won't need to vote any more", if you hear the entire thought, he's pretty clearly saying that he's going to fix the country so YUGELY that nobody will need to vote again!
Yep, Trump says lot of dumb things. There's no need to make up more.
That makes sense. Feeling ill can make one easily agitated. Awareness of what is causing that agitation is good because you can be more careful with, and reconsider, what you're saying...
....or not.
Yes, because it's funny when people take words out of context, to misrepresent what is meant, and then use those misrepresented words to stir up panic.
Right. That's a good example.
Another one is the Charlottesville "good people on both sides" quote that is constantly misrepresented.
Putting aside all other (crazy) speculation, I think paper ballots, which are scanned by (Dominion/Liberty, etc) tabulating machines, is the better option because there is a physical record of how each person voted.
I don't care for all electronic voting.
EDIT: I'll also note that states...
I have no doubt that you honestly believe that.
If she had reviewed the evidence and knew that there was a basis for bringing charges, why is she talking about it on the campaign trail, rather than doing it?
Correct. He is trying to get even.