Guns are controlled. There's law after law after law to get a gun, law after law after law stating what is illegal to do with a gun, etc.
As it turns out, criminals don't are about laws.
You keep bringing up Christians/Christianity, as though I wouldn't have an issue if the ordinance change was for them.
What I said was the ordinance shouldn't be changed for a religion. Last I checked, Christianity was a religion.
Adjusting a noise ordinance to accommodate a specific religion SHOULD be viewed as a constitutional issue.
Additionally, no religion should be permitted to blast their nonsense across society, especially in violation of a noise ordinance.
What's in the actual fuck...
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/minneapolis-becomes-first-major-u-s-city-to-broadcast-islamic-call-to-prayer-5-times-per-day
Accuracy isn't a factor for you because, either way, you are not okay with using it. So, like I said, the technicality of being accurate was irrelevant to the conversation, which is why I did not engage
You are attempting to convolute the discussion and I am not going to participate.
The claim was that, on its face and regardless of accuracy, "illegal", when used as a noun, is inherently dehumanizing. You are now trying to argue accuracy, which is not relevant in a conversation about...
Of course I've done things that are illegal. Illegal, as relates to people crossing the border illegally, certainly seems to be a shortening of the term "illegal alien" or "illegal border crosser", kind of like you would shorten "someone who speeds" to "speeder" or "am not" got shortened to "ain't".