"A Senator Just Unapologetically Declared the U.S. a White Homeland"

donbosco

Inconceivable Member
Messages
4,251

"A Senator Just Unapologetically Declared the U.S. a White Homeland

America, he says, isn’t an idea—and isn’t for everyone.


On Nov. 19, 1863, Abraham Lincoln delivered one of the greatest speeches in American history, the Gettysburg Address. It opened “Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”

On Tuesday (Sept. 2, 2025), Eric Schmitt, the junior senator from Missouri, declared that Lincoln was wrong.

“What is an American?” This was the question Schmitt posed at the fifth annual National Conservatism Conference in Washington. His answer is that the nation is fundamentally not based on the idea of equality or freedom or any other ideal. Nor is it accessible to people of all races and religions. It is fundamentally, he told an assembled crowd, a white homeland.

The white Europeans who settled America and conquered the West “believed they were forging a nation—a homeland for themselves and their descendants,” he said. “They fought, they bled, they struggled, they died for us. They built this country for us. America, in all its glory, is their gift to us, handed down across the generations. It belongs to us. It’s our birthright, our heritage, our destiny. If America is everything and everyone, then it is nothing and no one at all. But we know that’s not true. America is not a ‘universal nation.’”

A Sitting Senator Just Went Full Mask-Off White Nationalist


Here is a transcript of Schmitt's comments: Sen. Schmitt at NatCon : What Is an American?


The author at Slate asserts that Schmitt "Declared the U.S. a White Homeland" and that he said that Lincoln was wrong. Did he?

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Let’s just say for the sake of argument that what he said about the early European/ European-descended settlers and their vision of what America should be is true. Why would we want to revive or continue on with that terrible vision? Why should that be relevant today?
 
Neo-Confederates and blatant nativists are in the saddle right now, and what this guy is saying is exactly what most members of this administration and most Republicans believe. America isn't a melting pot or a tossed salad, it's a nation built by and for white people, and with native-born Religious Right rural and suburban white Americans at the top of the totem pole. This dude is just saying what used to be the quiet parts out loud, as are most of them now.
 
Last edited:
My bad for trusting Slate. Eric didn't use the word white but, yes, the original Americans were white Europeans.

I think he's probably wrong. I think the US, including the FF, has probably always been welcoming of immigrants but, if there was reason to believe that was their plan, so what? Japan, until they were forced to adjust due to labor needs, *wanted* to keep Japan almost completely for Japanese people.
 
Last edited:
My bad for trusting Slate. Eric didn't use the word white but, yes, the original Americans were white Europeans.

I think he's probably wrong. I think the US, including the FF, has probably always been welcoming of immigrants but, if there was reason to believe that was their plan, so what? Japan, until they were forced to adjust due to labor needs, *wanted* to keep Japan almost completely for Japanese people.
What could go wrong with the Japanese ethnocentrist model?
 
What could go wrong with the Japanese ethnocentrist model?
Nothing or something along the lines of a labor shortage that might necessitate an adjustment.

If every country in the world decided, from its inception, to be ethnocentric...ok.

Lights Out Idk GIF by CTV Comedy Channel
 
Last edited:
My bad for trusting Slate. Eric didn't use the word white but, yes, the original Americans were white Europeans.

I think he's probably wrong. I think the US, including the FF, has probably always been welcoming of immigrants but, if there was reason to believe that was their plan, so what? Japan, until they were forced to adjust due to labor needs, *wanted* to keep Japan almost completely for Japanese people.
He didn't have to use the word "white". It's understood.
 
So he was talking about white people even if he didn't use the word "white". Nothing wrong with the Slate piece.
Agree. There's nothing "wrong", but using "white" isn't unintentional. If Slate was talking about the Japanese or a Native American saying something similar about North America, they wouldn't include "brown".
 

"A Senator Just Unapologetically Declared the U.S. a White Homeland

America, he says, isn’t an idea—and isn’t for everyone.


On Nov. 19, 1863, Abraham Lincoln delivered one of the greatest speeches in American history, the Gettysburg Address. It opened “Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”

On Tuesday (Sept. 2, 2025), Eric Schmitt, the junior senator from Missouri, declared that Lincoln was wrong.

“What is an American?” This was the question Schmitt posed at the fifth annual National Conservatism Conference in Washington. His answer is that the nation is fundamentally not based on the idea of equality or freedom or any other ideal. Nor is it accessible to people of all races and religions. It is fundamentally, he told an assembled crowd, a white homeland.

The white Europeans who settled America and conquered the West “believed they were forging a nation—a homeland for themselves and their descendants,” he said. “They fought, they bled, they struggled, they died for us. They built this country for us. America, in all its glory, is their gift to us, handed down across the generations. It belongs to us. It’s our birthright, our heritage, our destiny. If America is everything and everyone, then it is nothing and no one at all. But we know that’s not true. America is not a ‘universal nation.’”

A Sitting Senator Just Went Full Mask-Off White Nationalist


Here is a transcript of Schmitt's comments: Sen. Schmitt at NatCon : What Is an American?


The author at Slate asserts that Schmitt "Declared the U.S. a White Homeland" and that he said that Lincoln was wrong. Did he?

Thoughts?








 
It's what MAGA has always been about. Racism and bigotry. Of course you have the rich and greedy, too, who don't care as long as they get richer. But the majority has always been about making America white again, and all the power and privilege only for straight white Christian nationalists. These people lost their minds after Obama, a man of color, was actually elected President twice. Now it is all about "taking their country back", which means going back before the 1960s.
 
Some excerpts from Schmitt's address:

"If America is everything and everyone, then it is nothing and no one at all. But we know that’s not true.

America is not a “universal nation.” It is something distinctive, unique, and real—unlike any other place or people in the history of mankind.

Western civilization was defined by its restless, relentless, dynamic spirit—a drive to create, explore and discover that spurred the West to heights of political, intellectual and technological achievement unmatched by any other civilization in human history.

America was settled, founded and built by the most adventurous, the most courageous, the most curious and innovative and risk-taking sons and daughters of the West.

Our country is, in this important sense, the most essentially Western nation. For our settler ancestors, the American frontier stretched out as a horizon of infinite possibility. It was here, on this continent, that the West realized its destiny.

This, my friends, is why every great feat of the modern world bore American fingerprints."

______________________

"We Americans are the sons and daughters of the Christian pilgrims that poured out from Europe’s shores to baptize a new world in their ancient faith. Our ancestors were driven here by destiny, possessed by urgent and fiery conviction, by burning belief, devoted to their cause and their God."

______________________

"For decades, the people in power sought to turn our past into a repressed memory—something so awful that we would prefer to forget it altogether. They made self-hatred and shame our new civic religion."

.......

When they tear down our statues and monuments, mock our history, and insult our traditions, they’re attacking our future as well as our past. By changing the stories we tell about ourselves, they believe they can build a new America—with the new myths of a new people.

But America does not belong to them. It belongs to us. It’s our home. It’s a heritage entrusted to us by our ancestors. It is a way of life that is ours, and only ours, and if we disappear, then America, too, will cease to exist."

____________________

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
____________________

If America was a universal proposition, then everything we inherited from our specific Western heritage had to be abolished. So the statues come down. The names are changed. Yesterday’s heroes become today’s villains. The story of the nation has to be rewritten to align America with its true creed.

On the Right, the situation wasn’t all that different. The truth is, by the 1990s, too many on the Right had come to accept the same basic worldview as the liberal elites they claimed to oppose.

In foreign policy, trade, immigration and the domestic culture wars, too many conservatives defined the American identity as nothing more than an abstract and vaguely-defined proposition. Even if you didn’t want to immigrate here, you would be made to submit to that proposition anyway, via military crusades to bring Madisonian democracy to the furthest corners of the world.

For years, conservatives would talk as if the whole world were just Americans-in-waiting—“born American, but in the wrong place.” America was, as one neoconservative writer put it, “The First Universal Nation.”

That’s what set Donald Trump apart from the old conservatism and the old liberalism alike: He knows that America is not just an abstract “proposition,” but a nation and a people, with its own distinct history and heritage and interests.

.........

The Continental Army soldiers dying of frostbite at Valley Forge, the Pilgrims struggling to survive in the hard winter soil of Plymouth, the pioneers striking out from Missouri for the wild and dangerous frontier, the outnumbered Kentucky settlers repelling wave after wave of Indian war band attacks from behind their stockade walls—all of them would be astonished to hear that they were only fighting for a “proposition.”
 





White House and DHS Share Image Apparently Created by White Nationalist​

The poster likes to use the N-word and share content from a neo-Nazi account, too.​



“… The image was first circulated by a white nationalist who has recently defended use of the n-word and shared material from an explicitly neo-Nazi X account, according to a review of social media activity.

IMG_9473.jpeg

…”
 
It's what MAGA has always been about. Racism and bigotry. Of course you have the rich and greedy, too, who don't care as long as they get richer. But the majority has always been about making America white again, and all the power and privilege only for straight white Christian nationalists. These people lost their minds after Obama, a man of color, was actually elected President twice. Now it is all about "taking their country back", which means going back before the 1960s.
No, they sold MAGA as going back to the 50s, but in reality they want to roll back to the 30s (pre-FDR America).

And based on some of those Homeland Security tweets, would say you might be right about the "60s" -- if you mean 1860s...
 
Back
Top