America’s Misinformation Crisis

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 145
  • Views: 2K
  • Politics 

“Russia and China are flooding social media with content targeting the ongoing unrest and violence in the United States [June 1 2020], according to an analysis of recent Twitter posts by POLITICO.


In online messages, often linking to videos of the recent violence, these digital actors have sought to portray the U.S. as a country on the brink, often highlighting perceived hypocrisy of Washington’s recent scolding of Beijing and Moscow for their civil rights abuses when parts of America are engulfed in flames and violence.

One of the most-shared social media messages from any official Russian or Chinese account, for instance, came from Hua Chunying, spokeswoman for China’s foreign ministry.

On May 30, she posted a message that said, “I can’t breathe” over a photo from the official U.S. State Department spokeswoman’s harsh words toward China’s treatment of Hong Kong. The phrase “I can’t breathe” has become a rallying cry for those in the U.S. protesting the police’s treatment of Floyd. The message from the Chinese official has been shared more than 8,000 times.

The Spanish-language version of RT, the Kremlin-backed media outlet, has also been one of the most active social media actors since the crisis began, posting regular updates that depict the U.S. as a country on the edge. Its most-shared post came on May 30 when it linked the recent violence to Malcom X, asking if U.S. law enforcement was still mistreating African Americans. The message has been shared more than 1,200 times. …”
 
(Cont’d)

“… While these official social media accounts have not posted doctored images or false information, they have sowed divisive content — a strategy that Russia previously used during the 2017 Catalan referendum in Spain and the 2019 European Parliament election, according to previous analyses of social media activity by POLITICO.

The goal, according to disinformation experts, is to foment distrust on both sides of the political spectrum rather than publishing easily identifiable fake social media posts. …”
 
Suggesting that BLM is a psy-op is misinformation. Point blank. I get that your uvula is pitch black from all the boot polish, but the DOJ doesn't offer, and cities do not accept, consent decrees in federal court detailing expansive formal findings of institutional racism and predatory policing based on misinformation.

You strain the gnat and swallow the camel.
I never suggested that BLM as a whole was misinformation. Just that it was exploited by our adversaries in order to sow discord within our society:


During the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the Russian government engaged in a sophisticated strategy to influence the U.S. political system and manipulate American democracy. While most news reports have focused on the cyber-attacks aimed at Democratic Party leaders and possible contacts between Russian officials and the Trump presidential campaign, a more pernicious intervention took place. Throughout the campaign, Russian operatives created hundreds of fake personas on social media platforms and then posted thousands of advertisements and messages that sought to promote racial divisions in the United States. This was a coordinated propaganda effort. Some Facebook and Twitter posts denounced the Black Lives Matter movement and others condemned White nationalist groups. Some called for violence. To be clear, these were posts by fake personas created by Russian operatives. But their effects were real. The purpose of this strategy was to manipulate public opinion on racial issues and disrupt the political process.

Let's not forget that "hands up, don't shoot" was misinformation that led to riots across the country.
 
LSU complied some key misinformation circulating during the George Floyd protests:


President Trump claimed that police did not use tear gas to clear apparently peaceful protestors outside the White House on June 1. ABC News reported, “According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ‘tear gas’ isn't a specific chemical compound but a general term for chemical agents used for riot control that may cause temporary respiratory distress. Compounds including Mace and pepper spray fit the CDC's definition.” The U.S. Secret Service later admitted that police used pepper spray.

… Hundreds of Twitter and Facebook posts suggested George Floyd is not dead, The New York Times reported.


George Soros, a billionaire investor and prolific Democratic donor, is blamed for funding the protests.

  • For years George Soros has been painted as a villain by the far-right and made the target of numerous conspiracy theories.
  • On Twitter, Soros was mentioned in 34,000 Tweets related to Floyd in a one-week period
  • On YouTube over 90 videos in five languages were shared connecting Soros with the protests in one week. YouTube did not remove the videos because they did not violate any of its policies.
  • On Facebook, 72,000 posts mentioned Soros the second week of the protests, up from 12,600 the first week. Of the 10 most popular posts about Soros, 9 featured false conspiracies linking him with the protests -- all 10 were collectively shared over 110,000 times
Two of the top Facebook posts were from Texas’ Agriculture Commissioner, Sid Miller, who said, “I have no doubt in my mind that George Soros is funding these so-called ‘spontaneous’ protests. Soros is pure evil and is hell-bent on destroying our country!”


Some conservative commentators asserted, with little evidence, that the riots and looting were coordinated by antifa, the far-left antifacist movement.

  • Vox reported that antifa is not a unified organization, but rather a loose ideological label for a subset of left-wing radicals who believe in using street-level force to prevent the rise of what they see as fascist movements.
  • Trump Tweeted in late May that “ANTIFA-led anarchists” and “Radical Left Anarchists” were to blame for the rioting and civil unrest. He referred to antifa as a “Terrorist Organization.” The FBI says there is no evidence the protest movement was hijacked by antifa or any other "extremist" group.
  • Trump tweeted that Martin Gugino, a peaceful protestor who was pushed down by Buffalo Police, could have been an “antifa provocateur.” AP journalists reported that Trump was referring to a report from the One America News Network (OANN), which cited an uninformed blog arguing that Gugino was using antifa-like tactics, such as “a method of police tracking used by Antifa to monitor the location of police.” Top tech experts called that claim confounding.
  • A fake “manual” of riot orders also appeared on Twitter that was supposedly created by Democrats to coordinate antifa activists. The manual was linked to an old hoax in 2015 surrounding the protests in Baltimore over the death of Freddie Gray.
  • A Twitter account that claimed to be associated with “anifa” was actually linked to Identity Evropa, a white-supremacist group. The Twitter account pushed violent rhetoric, ostensibly to paint peaceful protestors as violent. See the NBC News reporting.

  • According to Sky News, “the #DCblackout hashtag was used to promote false claims that authorities in DC were somehow preventing the protesters from using their smartphones to communicate with each other. Twitter removed the hashtag - which was being noticed worldwide - from the "trending topics" section due to what it described as "co-ordinated attempts to disrupt the public conversation" around the protests.”
  • The BBC reported that a photo of the U.S. presidential residence apparently with all its lights off has been shared widely on Twitter, including by Hillary Clinton. However, a reverse image search reveals that the photo is old - taken in 2014 - and it's been edited to make it look like all the lights are off.
  • As protests took place across the nationfollowing the death of George Floyd, claims surfaced online that animals at the Chicago Lincoln Park Zoo escaped and roamed the streets after an alleged break-in.
  • A photo falsely shows the Lincoln Memorial covered in graffiti. “The only vandalism at the Lincoln Memorial was graffiti at the bottom of the steps at street level, far away from the statue,” said Mike Litterst, chief of communications for the National Mall and Memorial Parks.
  • A conservative news website published a story with a misleading headline: “NPR Wants People to Burn Books Written By White People.” The NPR story says nothing about book burning. Instead, it implores white people to examine their bookshelves and see if they are only reading authors that look like them.
  • A public service announcement warns of a white supremacist who has been shooting at Black people at traffic lights. He drives a white truck and was last seen in Mesa, Arizona. The AP foundthat state and local police officials in Arizona as well as organizations that track violence by white supremacists said they received no reports of a gunman targeting Black motorists in Mesa, surrounding cities or elsewhere in the state last week. The Arizona ACLU and Southern Poverty Law Center said that they also did not receive reports of the shooter.
  • A news article suggests that an Abraham Lincoln monument was recently torched in Chicago. The AP found this to be false. A news article published in June falsely suggests that an Abraham Lincoln statue was burned in Chicago during protests that turned violent in the city. The incident happened in 2017, not recently.
The whole George Soros thing is one of the most persistent conspiracy claims that I've seen from right-wingers, it just keeps floating around on the net like a headache that won't go away. And of course it's just another example of projection by Republicans, because whatever Soros has supposedly done or how much money he's given to Democrats, it pales in comparison to what wealthy plutocrats like the Koch Brothers or Murdochs (or even Art Pope here in NC) have done and donated for hard-right Republicans. And now that Musk is fully on their side they've now got a vastly more powerful network than anything Soros may have (and practically all of the stories right-wingers have said about him are false or greatly exaggerated anyway). As usual, it's just all projection, all the damned time.
 


On Twitter and Facebook, hundreds of posts are circulating saying that George Floyd is not actually dead.

Conspiracy theorists are baselessly arguing that George Soros, the billionaire investor and Democratic donor, is funding the spreading protests against police brutality.

And conservative commentators are asserting with little evidence that antifa, the far-left antifascism activist movement, coordinated the riots and looting that sprang from the protests.

Untruths, conspiracy theories and other false information are running rampant online as the furor over Mr. Floyd, an African-American man who was killed last week in police custody in Minneapolis, has built.

The misinformation has surged as the protests have dominated conversation, far outpacing the volume of online posts and media mentions about last year’s protests in Hong Kong and Yellow Vest movement in France, according to the media insights company Zignal Labs.


President Trump himself has stoked the divisive information. Over the past few days, he posted on Twitter that antifa was a “Terrorist Organization” and urged the public to show up for a “MAGA Night” counterprotest at the White House.

Along with that, people are experiencing high levels of fear, uncertainty and anger, said Claire Wardle, executive director of First Draft, an organization that fights online disinformation. That creates “the worst possible context for a healthy information environment,” she said.

… The unfounded rumor that Mr. Floyd is alive is emblematic of the misinformation narrative that a newsworthy event was staged. This has become an increasingly common refrain over the years, with conspiracy theorists saying, among other examples, that the 1969 moon landing and the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School were hoaxes.

… The unsubstantiated theory that antifa activists are responsible for the riots and looting was the biggest piece of protest misinformation tracked by Zignal Labs, which looked at certain categories of falsehoods. Of 873,000 pieces of misinformation linked to the protests, 575,800 were mentions of antifa, Zignal Labs said.

… That began when Mr. Trump tweeted on Sunday that “ANTIFA led anarchists” and “Radical Left Anarchists” were to blame for the unrest, without providing specifics. Then he called antifa “a Terrorist Organization.”

… And on Twitter, a fake “manual” specifying “riot orders” that was supposedly issued by Democrats directing antifa activists to stir up trouble circulated prominently. But the so-called manual was a resurrection of an old hoax linked to the April 2015 riots in Baltimore over the death of Freddie Gray in police custody, the fact-checking website Snopes reported….”
——

There are unquestionably left-wing disinformation and conspiracy theories, as well, but the reporting and data indicates the gap is pretty one-sided in the case of the George Floyd and BLM protests. In that case, foreign state actors sought to amplify divisions and disinformation more than create the false images.

Since then, Russia has become increasingly bold about creating an entire platform of fake local news outlets used to plant fictional stories to promote its agenda and undermine US elections and institutions. China has been less bold with creation of images and fictional news, but active in amplifying divisive content and promoting pro-Chinese/anti-Taiwan propaganda.

Iran has also been very active in amplifying divisive content and promoting fictional and warped accounts of the conflicts with Israel. Iran definitely is amplifying and feeding the anti-Israel left.
 
The whole George Soros thing is one of the most persistent conspiracy claims that I've seen from right-wingers, it just keeps floating around on the net like a headache that won't go away. And of course it's just another example of projection by Republicans, because whatever Soros has supposedly done or how much money he's given to Democrats, it pales in comparison to what wealthy plutocrats like the Koch Brothers or Murdochs (or even Art Pope here in NC) have done and donated for hard-right Republicans. And now that Musk is fully on their side they've now got a vastly more powerful network than anything Soros may have (and pratically all of the stories about him are false or greatly exaggerated anyway). As usual, it's just all projection, all the damned time.
Projection with a decidedly antisemitic angle and supported/driven by Orban and his elected authoritarian government in Hungary.
 
I never suggested that BLM as a whole was misinformation. Just that it was exploited by our adversaries in order to sow discord within our society:


During the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the Russian government engaged in a sophisticated strategy to influence the U.S. political system and manipulate American democracy. While most news reports have focused on the cyber-attacks aimed at Democratic Party leaders and possible contacts between Russian officials and the Trump presidential campaign, a more pernicious intervention took place. Throughout the campaign, Russian operatives created hundreds of fake personas on social media platforms and then posted thousands of advertisements and messages that sought to promote racial divisions in the United States. This was a coordinated propaganda effort. Some Facebook and Twitter posts denounced the Black Lives Matter movement and others condemned White nationalist groups. Some called for violence. To be clear, these were posts by fake personas created by Russian operatives. But their effects were real. The purpose of this strategy was to manipulate public opinion on racial issues and disrupt the political process.

Let's not forget that "hands up, don't shoot" was misinformation that led to riots across the country.
What percentage of racial separatists are Democratic? I sure it's not zero. Propaganda meant to create racial division works best among those already predisposed to feeling that way. As a whole, that is not going to be the people who have busted their ass and risked their lives in the civil rights movement to be part of this society. I'm not doubting your facts, but, just damn, put some of your own thoughts into your opinion. It's like you regurgitated this after being spoon fed.
 
What percentage of racial separatists are Democratic? I sure it's not zero. Propaganda meant to create racial division works best among those already predisposed to feeling that way. As a whole, that is not going to be the people who have busted their ass and risked their lives in the civil rights movement to be part of this society. I'm not doubting your facts, but, just damn, put some of your own thoughts into your opinion. It's like you regurgitated this after being spoon fed.
My thoughts are that Russia, Iran, North Korea, etc. don't really care why we have unrest. They simply care that we have unrest, and will do whatever they can (within reason) to help stoke the embers that lead to unrest. We have done the same thing across the globe in other countries; this is nothing new. Remember the USS Maine? Misinformation that led us into war with Spain.

The key is to not make it easy on them. If something seems overtly outrageous, perhaps take a step back and wait for more information before taking action. Of course, this is not true for every event. Obviously 9/11 happened live on TV; people were right to be angry but at the same time you had people murdering Sikhs in the aftermath because they were misinformed. George Floyd's murder was captured on video. Those aren't really examples of gray area. But there is plenty of gray area that is not captured on video that still leads people to become irrationally angry, quickly. "FEMA is confiscating emergency relief supplies. The COVID vaccines are killing people. The police shot a kid 19 times in the back while he was surrendering." And so on.
 
Well, iirc, the Spanish-American War was ,in no small part, private enterprise. I believe that William Randolph Hearst told his photograper, whose name escapes me, "You provide the pictures and I'll provide the war".
 
The whole George Soros thing is one of the most persistent conspiracy claims that I've seen from right-wingers, it just keeps floating around on the net like a headache that won't go away. And of course it's just another example of projection by Republicans, because whatever Soros has supposedly done or how much money he's given to Democrats, it pales in comparison to what wealthy plutocrats like the Koch Brothers or Murdochs (or even Art Pope here in NC) have done and donated for hard-right Republicans. And now that Musk is fully on their side they've now got a vastly more powerful network than anything Soros may have (and practically all of the stories right-wingers have said about him are false or greatly exaggerated anyway). As usual, it's just all projection, all the damned time.
There has always been a George Soros. Conservatives have needed a tentacular Jewish moneylender causing problems since the 1800s and before. Back then they were the Rothschilds.

It's all just warmed over repurposed thinly veiled anti-Semitism.
 
I never suggested that BLM as a whole was misinformation. Just that it was exploited by our adversaries in order to sow discord within our society:


During the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the Russian government engaged in a sophisticated strategy to influence the U.S. political system and manipulate American democracy. While most news reports have focused on the cyber-attacks aimed at Democratic Party leaders and possible contacts between Russian officials and the Trump presidential campaign, a more pernicious intervention took place. Throughout the campaign, Russian operatives created hundreds of fake personas on social media platforms and then posted thousands of advertisements and messages that sought to promote racial divisions in the United States. This was a coordinated propaganda effort. Some Facebook and Twitter posts denounced the Black Lives Matter movement and others condemned White nationalist groups. Some called for violence. To be clear, these were posts by fake personas created by Russian operatives. But their effects were real. The purpose of this strategy was to manipulate public opinion on racial issues and disrupt the political process.

Let's not forget that "hands up, don't shoot" was misinformation that led to riots across the country.
Incredible. That's like saying that the lie "Gott Mit Uns" led to World War II.

Just completely devoid of any historical context or analysis.
 
I don't remember where it was from, but I read an article several years ago that did actual brain scans based on party affiliation. I can't remember the specific details, but they did find that in people who tended to vote GOP their brains had sections larger or more prone to fear responses.
yep.



 
Last edited:
If you genuinely believe that the phrase "hands up don't shoot" was responsible for the massive outpouring of public demonstrations, and not the underlying generations of institutional racism as thrown into particularly sharp focus by predatory policing, then no.
You don't think people protested and even rioted after the Michael Brown shooting? Were you under a rock in 2014? Dude's parents even testified in front of the UN. Massive misinformation campaign that much of the country fell for.
 
Massive misinformation campaign that much of the country fell for.
You don't know what a misinformation campaign is. It is spreading information that the speaker knows to be false, and which s/he is spreading for a malicious purpose.

I very much doubt his parents were lying. They might have been wrong, but they weren't spreading information they knew to be false. Also, he did not "testify" to the UN. There's no such thing. They spoke to the UN Committee Against Torture, which isn't remotely the same thing as the UN; they did so behind closed doors; and it's far from clear that meant anything to anyone at the time.
 
If you genuinely believe that the phrase "hands up don't shoot" was responsible for the massive outpouring of public demonstrations, and not the underlying generations of institutional racism as thrown into particularly sharp focus by predatory policing, then no.
Bluecups comments in the Israel/Palestine thread make a lot more sense in context with his views about race at home.
 
You don't know what a misinformation campaign is. It is spreading information that the speaker knows to be false, and which s/he is spreading for a malicious purpose.

I very much doubt his parents were lying. They might have been wrong, but they weren't spreading information they knew to be false. Also, he did not "testify" to the UN. There's no such thing. They spoke to the UN Committee Against Torture, which isn't remotely the same thing as the UN; they did so behind closed doors; and it's far from clear that meant anything to anyone at the time.
His parents may not have been lying, but plenty of people were spreading misinformation which is why we had protests (and riots) in the aftermath of the shooting. Most of those people may not have been knowingly spreading misinformation like you stated, but believing a lie and spreading that lie is still bad. I'm sure most of the people spreading conspiracies about the government steering hurricanes in order to take over a granite mine believe that nonsense, but it doesn't make that information any less wrong and harmful.
 
Most of those people may not have been knowingly spreading misinformation like you stated, I'm sure most of the people spreading conspiracies about the government steering hurricanes in order to take over a granite mine believe that nonsense, but it doesn't make that information any less wrong and harmful.
A misinformation campaign, by definition, requires knowing spreading of false information. "Misinformation" implies intent to deceive, and a "campaign" has to be intentional. So your own admission here retracts your earlier characterization, which is fine. Just be aware of it.

The people spreading conspiracy theories are doing so knowingly. They are spreading doctored or invented photos, reciting false anecdotes, and making up claims out of pure cloth. They have been corrected repeatedly and still do. The difference -- well, one difference -- is that people didn't fully know what happened in the Michael Brown situation. You couldn't "correct" the Brown family claims because there was no objective information to the contrary. knew what happened in the Michael Brown situation (we still don't).
 
Back
Top