superrific
Master of the ZZLverse
- Messages
- 10,753
I mean, I understand why they were so upset. I was upset too. Biden was letting Israel get away with too much. The problem was that he was politically constrained. I am positive Biden's people, and then Kamala's people, reached out to these groups and it went something like this:Purists and extremists don't care; they hate compromise more than the people who carry out the things they say they are 100% against.
Tlaib: There's a genocide in Gaza and you aren't stopping it.
Kamala: I promise I will do more after the election.
Tlaib: Why not now?
Kamala: Because I can't get elected if I'm seen as siding with terrorists.
Tlaib: Why should I care if you get elected?
And up until this point, the discussion is perfectly logical. But then:
Kamala: Because the alternative is Trump. We pushed back on Bibi several times and made him moderate. Trump will write him a blank check.
Tlaib: Trump says he will end the war Day One or even before.
Kamala: And you believe that?
Tlaib: "We take Trump at his word."
That last sentence really was uttered by several of the Michigan anti-Biden liberals, including IIRC Tlaib's sister. It really was. It's that latter part of the conversation where things really go off the rails. And I get the frustration. I am frustrated in many ways by the inertia of our system.