With regard to UNC Asheville’s plan to lease 45 acres so a private developer can build a 5,000-seat soccer stadium, apartments and retail space, I sympathize with the concerns of citizens whose taxes will subsidize the stadium, Five Points neighborhood residents whose property will be negatively affected and the eco-minded over the irrevocable loss of a substantial urban forest. However, I find it scandalous that this project qualifies under the UNC System’s millennial campus act.
The purpose of the millennial campus designation is to generate revenue from university property and facilities to “enhance the institution’s research, teaching and service missions as well as enhance the economic development of the region served by the institution.”
Yes, UNC Asheville’s research, teaching and service missions depend upon the institution’s financial sustainability, but they are not one and the same, as UNC Asheville Board of Trustees Chair Roger Aiken implies when he argues that the stadium “will provide a valuable public resource and generate an estimated $1 million annually to support the university’s mission.” How so? No documents have been released detailing these economic projections or how leasing campus property to an Ohio developer to build and operate a sports and entertainment district adjacent to the main campus enhances the university’s educational mission.
The university’s presentation to the Board of Governors Committee on Budget and Finance meeting on June 18 made one reference pertaining to “academic integration” in the project’s “strategic alignment” with the university’s mission. It reads, “Internships and academic tie-ins will allow for year-round experiential learning.”
The project appears to rest on the assumption that private development of public land will attract and retain students and thus
indirectly enhance UNC Asheville’s research, teaching and service missions through increased enrollment. Yet, Aiken himself notes that “demographic shifts are shrinking the pool of traditional college-age students, and public funding is becoming increasingly uncertain.” A year after announcing a stop to the enrollment decline, the university recently reported an enrollment decline and another $2 million budget shortfall. Meanwhile, the passage of the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill” ensures that college will become even more unaffordable.
The project is risky, requires several leaps of faith to figure its benefit to UNC Asheville and pushes the boundaries of legislation. Notably, when discussing legal consultation at the June 18 meeting, Board of Governors Committee on Budget and Finance Chair Kirk J. Bradley admitted it was a “little trickier and unusual getting this ground lease right.” Private-public partnerships like this one are ready-made for conflicts of interest and corruption.
A state whose constitution claims that the benefits of our public institutions of higher education “as far as practicable, be extended to the people of the state free of expense” could choose to increase funds for higher education and thus directly support the educational mission of its universities. Instead, our leaders continue to prioritize tax cuts and pro-capitalist policies, and so we get a plan to generate revenue for UNC Asheville that lacks any educational value and further privatizes the public sphere.
— Kirk Boyle
Professor of English
UNC Asheville
Asheville
Editor’s note: After this letter was published in the print issue,
UNCA announced a “pause” to its development negotiations Aug. 14 and the creation of a Millennial Campus Development Commission.
mountainx.com