"Bad Faith Posters"

BlueSmoke said:
Wasn't aware Hogg had been removed. He should be. What he's saying is that HE wants to cherry pick who doesn't run, and that HE picks the replacement. I thought that's what elections are for.

Cost of eggs: What's your point? May be in a bird flu lull, but considering Trump's cuts to the government agencies dealing with this, I doubt it will last for long. And we better hope because of his cuts it doesn't jump to humans.
Click to expand...
Typical of the Democrats.

When was the last time you had a legitimate primary? You kicked Biden out... you coronated Harris, the worst candidate in history, and you did it without an election.

Hogg was elected. He didn't goose step to the party line.

Out.

But you people keep saying that the GOP is destroying democracy.

DId Hilliary win the nomination or was it given to her?

Bernie says she didn't.

Your movve
 
GuyFree said:
Typical of the Democrats.

When was the last time you had a legitimate primary? You kicked Biden out... you coronated Harris, the worst candidate in history, and you did it without an election.

Hogg was elected. He didn't goose step to the party line.

Out.

But you people keep saying that the GOP is destroying democracy.

DId Hilliary win the nomination or was it given to her?

Bernie says she didn't.

Your movve
Click to expand...
Part of being elected to that post is signing a pledge to not do what he's doing. He didn't. Same as if someone doesn't take an oath of office. Just because you are elected doesn't mean you can do what you want. Republicans should take note, and kick Trump out.

Hillary got the delagates so I assume she did. Not aware of what Bernie says.

Wasn't aware anyone kicked Biden out. If he couldn't stand the pressure then that's his problem.
 
I’ve asked this question in the past but you guys always seem split on whether we should ban posters like this…
 
GuyFree said:
Do you want an echo chamber or different opinions?

You came over from the KU website. I was there when it all went down.

Your own it. You make the call.
Click to expand...
You keep saying this, as if you have good intentions of spurring good conversation or debate.

But this is my first awareness of you and you just seem like a typical tribal asshole who barged in trying to troll and provoke. Of your several threads I didn’t see any points that you tried to make respectfully, intelligently, or with any dignity. So you’re the one who made the call, and you own your bs. Nobody here will miss it.
 
GuyFree said:
Question for nyc...

You banned me for being a "bad faith" poster.

What does that mean?

I posted facts.

Super even said as much.

I guess if the facts do not align with your political beliefs it is fine to ban a poster.

You were absent yesterday when the economic report came out. You were absent when ANYTHING positive comes out about the GOP.

Just admit you want this site to be an echo chamber of like minded left wing opinions.

Things you didn't mention... David Hogg removed from his position, Milwaukee judge charged.... And Super said it would never happen.... cost of eggs.

I guess the special on Franzia and kitty litter was too much for you to pass up.

Keep kicking that football...

Your generation continues to deliver for the GOP.

When you wake up in the morning... to post your never ending anti-Trump stories... Guess what? He's YOUR POTUS.

Thank you and enjoy your evening!
Click to expand...
Oops. You got banned again. Dang it.
 
This poster is a pretty good example of the issue with banning bad faith posters rather than having the community choose to ignore them. For whatever reason, he keeps coming back, usually overnight, to set up a new identity and continue attacking the board for jollies.

So guys like this are whack-a-mole problems who apparently enjoy being destructive towards a small community that wants to have reasonably good faith discussions of topics. And some of us sort of aid and abet this sort of bad faith behavior by engaging in Corgi backbiting fights to no end other than enabling the bad faith poster to derail threads and denigrate the community.
 
Banned poster comes here claiming he wants to "engage", but spends most of his new posts expressing his disdain and loathing for nearly every poster here, does the usual cliches of calling liberal boards "echo chambers" in spite of the sharp differences of opinion often expressed here, and is clearly here not to engage or have a respectful debate but rather to just insult liberal board posters and to express their deep resentment at being excluded here and not having their posts taken seriously, despite the fact that they are not a serious poster to begin with. Same as it ever was.
 
Last edited:
So who was this guy again?

I've stated in the past that I don't favor banning posters unless they engage in egregious behavior. The ZZLP quickly became an echo chamber and I think the board suffered as a result. Super Ignore is an amazing feature. It enables people to enact their own bans. Not sure why people don't use it.
 
This guy claims he wants good faith discussions of varying viewpoints, but all he does is bitch and moan and post the same bullshit tweets as Dogood. His side controls all the levers of our federal government but somehow he is still a fucking victim.

I'm starting to think he isn't serious about being a good faith poster.
 
farce© said:
This guy claims he wants good faith discussions of varying viewpoints, but all he does is bitch and moan and post the same bullshit tweets as Dogood. His side controls all the levers of our federal government but somehow he is still a fucking victim.

I'm starting to think he isn't serious about being a good faith poster.
Click to expand...
I'm never completely comfortable putting malice before stupidity when I don't know the record. It's so much more an endemic problem. I have to admit that malice is a common side effect.
 
I’m generally opposed to banning unless certain lines are crossed (e.g., hate speech, threats, harassment). Though I do think spamming can be a basis for banning as well. Granted, I have never utilized the ignore/super ignore functions, so maybe that’s a way to block spammers. Not sure if using those functions makes threads harder to read if a spammer is blocked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top