stankeylegjones
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 2,062
Ah, got it. Me not wording my post accurately.I understood you were just referring to metrics, but it was odd to describe that as "We've yet to have a year better than Duke."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah, got it. Me not wording my post accurately.I understood you were just referring to metrics, but it was odd to describe that as "We've yet to have a year better than Duke."
I respectfully disagree. He tried, really, really hard to get one and dones, but had an extremely low hit percentage. He never had the option to get five one and dones because he wasn't willing to pay them what they wanted.Roy certainly made a choice to prioritize multi-year players, which is a big part of why he didn't get as many of the OADs once that era really kicked off.
Even when Roy recruited highly-rated players, he often went after ones who had a hole in their game (height, athleticism, shot-making) that meant they weren't likely to be OAD. And even when Roy did go after OADs, it was pretty clear they'd have to compete for a starting spot and he wasn't promising the build the team around them as other schools did. Roy saw OADs as the icing on the cake rather than all the ingredients to make the cake.
I have no doubt that Roy could have done better in getting OADs by changing his strategy, but he was unwilling to do so. So he settled for more low 5-stars and 4-stars than the elite 5-stars, but he built a program that would succeed that based around those players with a few elites sprinkled in.
I think that he intentionally made a choice that he wasn't willing to make the promises (or pay the required amounts) necessary to get many of them. It wasn't something forced upon him by the basketball gods nor the University and there was nothing external stopping him from doing so. He willingly made the choice to not go the OAD factory route.I respectfully disagree. He tried, really, really hard to get one and dones, but had an extremely low hit percentage. He never had the option to get five one and dones because he wasn't willing to pay them what they wanted.
I added a quote to my post above. I think Roy was very honest that he couldn't recruit one and done talent the way he wanted to.I think that he intentionally made a choice that he wasn't willing to make the promises (or pay the required amounts) necessary to get many of them. It wasn't something forced upon him by the basketball gods nor the University and there was nothing external stopping him from doing so. He willingly made the choice to not go the OAD factory route.
I don't think he wanted 5 OADs per year, I think his preferred team would have been largely upperclassmen with 1-2 OADs added to bring in elite skills. But the fact that he wasn't catering to the OADs turned off a lot of the ones he pursued (and I think he was largely ok with that trade off).
I agree that Roy recruited OAD talent and didn't get them, but I also think Roy often recruited OAD talent with one arm that he'd tied behind his own back (and then the NCAA stuff tied the other one back there).I added a quote to my post above. I think Roy was very honest that he couldn't recruit one and done talent the way he wanted to.
There is some chicken and egg going on here.I agree that Roy recruited OAD talent and didn't get them, but I also think Roy often recruited OAD talent with one arm that he'd tied behind his own back (and then the NCAA stuff tied the other one back there).
A lot of OAD talent wanted promises of guaranteed starter roles, playing time, a certain number of shots per game, etc. Roy wasn't going to promise any of that and recruits knew he often prioritized upperclassmen over freshmen. So the elite OADs often weren't going to choose Carolina because Roy wasn't going to make the promises that other schools made.
But that was a choice Roy made and one he could have changed his mind on at any time; it was a self-selected restriction.
Also, from the article you quoted...
Williams has landed players ranked just outside the top five that likely won't be leaving after one year. The 2014 class that saw him land Justin Jackson, Theo Pinson, and Joel Berry is a perfect example. While those three weren't listed in the top five, they were all ranked as top-20 recruits, but none projected as one-and-done players.
Jackson and Berry are the Tar Heels' leading scorers as juniors this season, while Pinson has battled injuries throughout the campaign, but has shone when healthy.
Roy had a type in his recruits and his type didn't lend itself to getting many OADs. But his type also led to a lot of experienced and talented upperclassmen on a reasonably consistent basis.
A couple more comments...There is some chicken and egg going on here.
I think both of us agree that Roy wasn’t willing to do what it took to get one and done talent and therefore he had no choice but to focus on the next tier down.
Now, could Roy have changed his spots and pulled a K in 2014? I think that would have been very hard with the NCAA investigation looming and the lack of US Olympic team branding. In other words, I don’t think he really had the ability to play that game when K decided to, even if he were willing to do so.
A HoF coach, a famous university, and a tremendous presence in the NBA on the court and in the front offices. The latter was maybe the most important.A couple more comments...
I think US Olympic team association is way oversold in terms of dook suddenly becoming a OAD machine. Coach K had been the coach for 8 years when dook pivoted to recruiting a lot of OADs. I'm not saying the association with USA Basketball wasn't helpful, but I don't think it was a truly significant input that has become the stuff of myth and legend.
I don't know that the NCAA investigation would have prevented Roy from leaning heavier into OAD recruits unless you think the main way one got OADs was to pay them under the table (which I'll grant is a legitimate view). But, if that's the argument, then there also needs to be a reasonable explanation for how Roy pulled the OADs he got to Carolina.
Carolina had a HoF coach & a famous university and, in 2013, I'm not sure that dook had many more NBA players/FO folks than we did.A HoF coach, a famous university, and a tremendous presence in the NBA on the court and in the front offices. The latter was maybe the most important.
You think Roy had the green light to pay players and families?I agree that Roy recruited OAD talent and didn't get them, but I also think Roy often recruited OAD talent with one arm that he'd tied behind his own back (and then the NCAA stuff tied the other one back there).
A lot of OAD talent wanted promises of guaranteed starter roles, playing time, a certain number of shots per game, etc. Roy wasn't going to promise any of that and recruits knew he often prioritized upperclassmen over freshmen. So the elite OADs often weren't going to choose Carolina because Roy wasn't going to make the promises that other schools made.
But that was a choice Roy made and one he could have changed his mind on at any time; it was a self-selected restriction.
Also, from the article you quoted...
Williams has landed players ranked just outside the top five that likely won't be leaving after one year. The 2014 class that saw him land Justin Jackson, Theo Pinson, and Joel Berry is a perfect example. While those three weren't listed in the top five, they were all ranked as top-20 recruits, but none projected as one-and-done players.
Jackson and Berry are the Tar Heels' leading scorers as juniors this season, while Pinson has battled injuries throughout the campaign, but has shone when healthy.
Roy had a type in his recruits and his type didn't lend itself to getting many OADs. But his type also led to a lot of experienced and talented upperclassmen on a reasonably consistent basis.
I’m highly suspicious of claims that everyone else but us was paying recruits yet we reasonably routinely got highly ranked recruits without doing so.You think Roy had the green light to pay players and families?
Well, there was the Nassir Little matter, where the shoe company folks who were paying players and steering them to certain schools were caught on the phone discussing that Little’s family wouldn’t take the money.I’m highly suspicious of claims that everyone else but us was paying recruits yet we reasonably routinely got highly ranked recruits without doing so.
I’m highly suspicious of claims that everyone else but us was paying recruits yet we reasonably routinely got highly ranked recruits without doing so.
To me, this isn’t about any one player or situation, it’s about the idea, often floated on Carolina message boards, that OAD recruiting was very pay-based and that’s why Carolina fell behind others, while ignoring that over the years of the OAD era, Carolina did about as well, on the whole, as any other school not named Dook or UK.Well, there was the Nassir Little matter, where the shoe company folks who were paying players and steering them to certain schools were caught on the phone discussing that Little’s family wouldn’t take the money.
A couple more comments...
I think US Olympic team association is way oversold in terms of dook suddenly becoming a OAD machine. Coach K had been the coach for 8 years when dook pivoted to recruiting a lot of OADs. I'm not saying the association with USA Basketball wasn't helpful, but I don't think it was a truly significant input that has become the stuff of myth and legend.
I don't know that the NCAA investigation would have prevented Roy from leaning heavier into OAD recruits unless you think the main way one got OADs was to pay them under the table (which I'll grant is a legitimate view). But, if that's the argument, then there also needs to be a reasonable explanation for how Roy pulled the OADs he got to Carolina.
I finally got a chance to watch the game. Wilson would have made a HUGE difference. No way, no how do the Heels give up that many offensive boards in the second half with Caleb in the lineup. Boozer doesn't get an open lane to the basket either. We REALLY missed Caleb Wilson in that game. I'm not saying that we win the game, but it would have been much, much closer.I haven't seen the game yet. I had to work last night; I've been busy today; and I have to work again tonight. I hope to watch it tomorrow.
I'm not sure the Heels would have won with Caleb Wilson at Cameron, but would his availability have shaved 10 points off the deficit?
Because we lost our best player for the season.I don't get how the Heels fell two spots in the poll to 19 and have less losses than all the teams ranked 14-18.