- Messages
- 1,513
Why do you revisit threads for these pithy rejoinders but not respond to conversations...especially when people are answering the questions you put to them?It almost always does.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do you revisit threads for these pithy rejoinders but not respond to conversations...especially when people are answering the questions you put to them?It almost always does.
because i'm not glued to the computer or spend hours every day on here like you and others.Why do you revisit threads for these pithy rejoinders but not respond to conversations...especially when people are answering the questions you put to them?
No, I'm saying competition raises the bar (public and private) and the best (teachers, administrators, etc.) will stand out. When staffed with highly competent people, most schools succeed. You can no longer say public staff are better overall than private staff because many left public education to teach in private schools due to the bureaucracy and other types of bullshit that they don't have to put up with in private education.I don't think this statement is comprehensible, but if I'm understanding it, are you suggesting the people running public schools are subpar compared with other educators? If so, I couldn't disagree more strongly.
Lol...you see, theres this post count thing up there that shows you're here and posting nearly 50% more than me.because i'm not glued to the computer or spend hours every day on here like you and others.
Yeah, I can't speak for other states, but I don't think many people realize just how poorly paid many private school teachers in NC are, even when compared to public school pay, which sucks (NC now ranks 43rd in the nation in teacher pay). I have a friend that teaches at a historic private school in central NC, and she said that sometimes people will say something like "oh, you must get paid really well compared to public school", but her pay is actually about $8,000 below NC public teacher pay for her years of experience. My guess is some private schools in the Charlotte and Raleigh-Durham areas pay better, but I know that most private schools in the Triad area, for example, pay significantly less than NC public schools. People who think that private school teachers get better pay and benefits would likely be very surprised at the salaries and benefits offered at many of these schools - they stay in business and turn a profit in part because they don't pay their employees very much.In reality public schools get better the better teachers, admin, support staff, etc.
Only the most expensive, elite private schools are competitive and those are more about who attends than who works there.
Most private schools are not on par with the public schools
Bingo.Yeah, I can't speak for other states, but I don't think many people realize just how poorly paid many private school teachers in NC are, even when compared to public school pay, which sucks (NC now ranks 43rd in the nation in teacher pay). I have a friend that teaches at a historic private school in central NC, and she said that sometimes people will say something like "oh, you must get paid really well compared to public school", but her pay is actually about $8,000 below NC public teacher pay for her years of experience. My guess is some private schools in the Charlotte and Raleigh-Durham areas pay better, but I know that most private schools in the Triad area, for example, pay significantly less than NC public schools. People who think that private school teachers get better pay and benefits would likely be very surprised at the salaries and benefits offered at many of these schools - they stay in business and turn a profit in part because they don't pay their employees very much.
Oh, what bullshit. Where in my post did I mention abortion or NPR? Nice distraction. I'm sure you've heard of separation of church and state, which used to exist in this country. What business is it of the US government to promote one religion (or a preferred branch of one religion - in most cases Evangelical Christianity) over all others? It's not the same and you know it, and again, that's not even the point of the post.Wait, you don't think tax / voucher money should be used for parents to send kids to conservative, fundamentalist Christian schools but you have a problem if I don't want tax money going to support a liberal biased NPR or for abortions? The absolute definition of hypocrisy.
Its interesting that you think competition matters in getting the best people but I bet you surely dont advocate for paying teachers competitive salaries to other private industry. That’s what it takes for the best minds to become teachers.No, I'm saying competition raises the bar (public and private) and the best (teachers, administrators, etc.) will stand out. When staffed with highly competent people, most schools succeed. You can no longer say public staff are better overall than private staff because many left public education to teach in private schools due to the bureaucracy and other types of bullshit that they don't have to put up with in private education.
So you support US taxpayers paying for "radical Islamic indoctrination". Interesting concept you have there.Wait, you don't think tax / voucher money should be used for parents to send kids to conservative, fundamentalist Christian schools but you have a problem if I don't want tax money going to support a liberal biased NPR or for abortions? The absolute definition of hypocrisy.
I will take that post as confirmation that you do do not believe public schools are a shared common expense that the entire community pays into and benefits from.Folks like me believe that taxes continue to go up but results don't improve proportionally. It's far beyond time to overhaul a broken system.
Sure. Problem students that are required to be admitted to a public school, no matter their circumstances, are going to always do as well as a selected group of students. I doubt even you buy that.Huh. For the 23/24 school year, the Atlanta Public Schools spent $22,620 per student. Up from 19k the previous school year. We should be seeing something approaching elite private school results.
Are you intentionally obtuse? Not the budget but the educational outcome is the issue that is affected. I sure hope your PA is good.Some Atlanta private schools, like Woodward Academy, do take students with learning disabilities and have special classes and teachers for them. There is an added tuition cost.
I can't imagine problem students account for a significant amount of the APS's budget. I agree though it is a factor.
Cost of most things are higher in an urban setting such as Atlanta. Is the cost per student increase disproportionate to the standard cost increases year over year of other industry in Atlanta?Huh. For the 23/24 school year, the Atlanta Public Schools spent $22,620 per student. Up from 19k the previous school year. We should be seeing something approaching elite private school results.
actually, it is around 18k per child this year and it covers special needs children and increased health insurance costs for employees. I don't know the comparison between Atlanta public schools and elite private schools that screen students for acceptance based upon academic performance, but then again I'm not all about comparing apples to bottles of Dom Perignon.Huh. For the 23/24 school year, the Atlanta Public Schools spent $22,620 per student. Up from 19k the previous school year. We should be seeing something approaching elite private school results.
But they'd sure own the libs, wouldn't they? Their entire families could be gassed and they'd still bleat about "WINNING!"How did the people of Germany in the 1930s let Hitler happen? Just like calla, river, and ram are doing now.
trump could rape a 14-year-old on 5th Avenue, send 6,0000,000 Latinos to gas chambers then run for president again in 2028 and they would still vote for him.
It really is something reading the replies to tweets and social media posts from news media articles about almost anything Trump-related. His supporters main defense of almost anything he does boils down "he's owning those libs, and I just love it!" And that's it. Very few of the posts actually try to defend his "big, beautiful bill", or attacks on US universities, or other actions, instead the posts nearly always boil down to "he makes the libs mad and they have TDS and it makes me so happy". Kind of sad, really.But they'd sure own the libs, wouldn't they? Their entire families could be gassed and they'd still bleat about "WINNING!"