Please explain why that argument in this case isn't accurate. The concept of it always has to be the fault of one side or the other, especially in politics, seems intellectually lazy, willfully ignorant, and that the person making that argument is incapable of independent thought and reflection. That argument absolutely destroys businesses, schools, sports teams, etc. because it basically implies that failure is never the fault of the person making that type of argument. If you can't see that political rhetoric that incites violence is common across both parties then you are choosing to accept and approve of it. Never have understood why analyzing something with the knowledge that the problem could point back to me was in some way wrong.