lawtig02
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 2,976
I’m pretty sure Grassley was in Congress pre-Marbury, so if anyone would want to go back to that time, makes sense it would be him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So how did we get the illegal immigrants in in the first place. Where were the judges?I believe they have the authority to override Trump when he does something illegal, not “whenever they feel like it.”
Whatever silliness you think is the job of the judiciary, it is definitely not their job to handle border crossings. It is their job to adjudicate whether people should stay or should be removed.So how did we get the illegal immigrants in in the first place. Where were the judges?
Wow, this guy literally believes it is the job of judges to patrol the border and arrest or detain people crossing the border illegally.So how did we get the illegal immigrants in in the first place. Where were the judges?
Biden flew them here, first class from shithole countries. The judges served as flight attendants on those flights.So how did we get the illegal immigrants in in the first place. Where were the judges?
They got free HealthCare and $600,00 housesBiden flew them here, first class from shithole countries. The judges served as flight attendants on those flights.
That’s how they do it in Mother Russia.Wow, this guy literally believes it is the job of judges to patrol the border and arrest or detain people crossing the border illegally.
I was told the courts could overide trump when he does something illegal. So how come the courts dont overide illegal border crossings?Wow, this guy literally believes it is the job of judges to patrol the border and arrest or detain people crossing the border illegally.
Happens a lot when people are trying to communicate in a second language.A non sequitur is a statement or conclusion that does not logically follow from the premises or previous statements. In other words, it's a fallacy where the conclusion doesn't logically connect to the given information.