1moretimeagain
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 3,825
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except for top GOP people keep making anti-gun statements then having to walk them back. Honestly feels like trial balloons to see if that is a line they can cross yet.One of the things that is so goddamned frustrating in all this is watching all the right wingers who have spent decades inventing conspiracies about how Democrats are spying on Americans, making lists of gun owners Red Dawn style, letting the UN set up secret bases, using FBI as jack-booted thugs, requiring a terrifying national ID, elitist pedophile rings, making a criminal database of political opponents and THEN the Trump Admin starts ACTUALLY doing some of that stuff (not the secret UN bases) and suddenly it is brilliant!
Except the 2A purists. They are good with everything except the mere suggestion of gun restrictions of any kind. A bright line for them.
“Sovereign borders are biblical and right and just. It's not because we hate the people on the outside. It's because we love the people on the inside.”
——
Variation on “hate the sin, love the sinner” justification for homophobia.
But the IG deemed the first claim not credible …Per an IG memo to members of Congress published by the AP, the whistleblower complaint alleged "(1) distribution of a highly classified intelligence report was restricted for political purposes; and (2) the responsible IC element's Office of General Counsel failed to report a potential crime to the Department of Justice, also for political purposes."
2A is the Third Rail of GOP politics still. Most of the former “common sense gun laws” Republicans had been whittled down since the ‘90s and now have decamped at this point.Except for top GOP people keep making anti-gun statements then having to walk them back. Honestly feels like trial balloons to see if that is a line they can cross yet.
Right, and the current IG would not have concluded the allegations meet the "urgent concern" standard.But the IG deemed the first claim not credible …
yeah, this is nuts. no one is safe. participating in this board is probably risky.I searched the topic to get an article without a paywall or sign in. I found myself even more alarmed by the details than the headline. The government is literally sending intimidation documents to corporations in an effort to create smear and strong arm campaigns on everyday citizens who criticize the government.
![]()
ACLU Moves to Quash Abusive Subpoena Aimed at Tracking Down Man Who Criticized Department of Homeland Security | American Civil Liberties Union
DHS sent a subpoena to unmask the man’s account information after he sent an email asking a department official to treat a man seeking asylum from...www.aclu.org
i started reading this book on the bible the other day, really gets into metaphorical/historical interpretation vs. literal interpretation (and why, frankly, literal interpretation makes absolutely no damn sense).I always love how fundamentalists claim they take the Bible literally and yet they vigorously interpret the Scriptures to suit their needs as much as anyone. Just another of the endless examples of Religious Right hypocrisy. They have become the very things they speak against - corrupt, decadent, and power-hungry Pharisees who represent a false version of Christianity and Christ's teachings, just as Christ himself warned about in the Book of Matthew.
I also love how fundamentalists are so certain and absolutist about what everything in the bibles says and means, yet if you point to something that is contradictory or goes against their narrative, they’ll respond that the lord works in mysterious ways that none of us can begin to truly understand. So which is it: Do you know with certainty what the bible is saying, or is it full of mystery and you cannot begin to understand it?I always love how fundamentalists claim they take the Bible literally and yet they vigorously interpret the Scriptures to suit their needs as much as anyone. Just another of the endless examples of Religious Right hypocrisy. They have become the very things they speak against - corrupt, decadent, and power-hungry Pharisees who represent a false version of Christianity and Christ's teachings, just as Christ himself warned about in the Book of Matthew.
That's a term of art here and it doesn't mean what it implies.But the IG deemed the first claim not credible …
If the provenance of the New Testament didn't bother you, the realization that the Protestant interpretation is most influenced by Luther, a German academic and John Calvin, a French lawyer so basically you had one splitting hairs and the other looking for loopholes.i started reading this book on the bible the other day, really gets into metaphorical/historical interpretation vs. literal interpretation (and why, frankly, literal interpretation makes absolutely no damn sense).
![]()
Reading the Bible Again for the First Time: Taking the …
Many Christians mistakenly believe that their only choi…www.goodreads.com
and of course, 99% of literalists/fundamentalists out there are massive hypocrites who pick and choose their interpretations (and simply ignore lots of scripture altogether) based on their own convenience and/or personal ideals.
Huh, I thought Calvin was Swiss. He lived in Switzerland when he did all his writing, but you are right, he was originally French. However, Luther was not an academic. He was a monk.If the provenance of the New Testament didn't bother you, the realization that the Protestant interpretation is most influenced by Luther, a German academic and John Calvin, a French lawyer so basically you had one splitting hairs and the other looking for loopholes.
What I find most intriguing about the literalists in Protestant ranks, especially with their reliance on the OT, is that they don't use the same version of it that Jesus used. The one they use was put together about nine centuries later and adapted from Judaic scholarship.
