Realistically, how many people with 9-5 jobs don't have a valid ID? I would imagine most people who have no ID don't work, are retired or in nursing homes and are likely on disability or receive social security. We're narrowing down the number of people impacted by this as pretty miniscule.
Now do literacy tests.
approx 75 million people were given no choice as to who they wanted as the dim potus nominee. It was dictated to them by a handful of people. That's world record disenfranchisement there Dr. Bob
And there are already methods in place for those people to vote.
Goes beyond just illegal immigrants.
Or maybe it means you're misreading the room. If you're able to recognize things like that.
I would like for Biden to have dropped out earlier and had a normal Dem primary, but while I can't speak for other Dems, I don't feel like I was disenfranchised.
I didn't realize that voter fraud has gone beyond " illegals" being shipped in across the border to vote for Democrats.
sorry, I reserve serious arguments for serious people
Primaries aren't required by law. In fact, there were no open primaries for the majority of the country's history. Sort of weird to call that disenfranchisement.
But you were because the right to cast a vote for your desired candidate was taken away from you. The fact that you were ok with it doesn't mean it didn't happen.
You might want to go over to the Oklahoma board then.
This some seriously stupid shit right here.
the room has nothing to do with it. 75 million people were denied their right to vote. That is the very definition of disenfranchisement.
I don’t think any US officials could dream up policies worse than what Trump has done to enhance and promotes Chinas position in the world. He will make China Great and the world leader way sooner than anyone predicted.
How would the United States be “of no further force and effect”? That’s a phrase we use frequently in contracts when we terminate (or contemplate termination of) legal documents. Trump likely sees it regularly, has a general gist of the impact must think it sounds official or something.
Anyway, funny how he pivots from attacking the globalists at the WSJ to attacking judges.
Could you please point me to the federal law or constitutional provision that gives voters the "right" to choose a party's presidential candidate? Thanks in advance. I assume you have this at your fingertips since you're so strident about it.
Sheep would feel that way.
