CURRENT EVENTS July 31-Sept 27

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 62K
  • Politics 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why is this case getting a lot of play in the right wing fever swamp?
The guy had 14 arrests, multiple that were violent in nature, and did only 5 years for armed robbery in 2014.

This is an issue because it's perceived as yet another Democrat "soft on crime" situation.

Dems will counter by claiming it's all about race for Republicans...
 
Last edited:

Video shows fatal stabbing of Ukrainian refugee on Charlotte light rail – stirring debate on crime in major US cities​


image.jpg

Gruesome video shows a 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee getting stabbed to death on a Charlotte light rail train – a case that has turned into a flashpoint as the Trump administration vows to crack down on crime in large, predominantly Democratic cities.

The unprovoked attack happened shortly before 10 p.m. August 22, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department said. A caller said a woman was stabbed in the throat.

The victim, Iryna Zarutska, is a refugee who recently fled from war-torn Ukraine, CNN affiliate WBTV reported.

Video of the attack shows Zarutska entering a train car and taking a seat directly in front of the suspect, court documents state.

Re: the light rail stabbing: The randomness of that act is what makes it so incredibly horrifying, as does that image posted.

The likelihood of being a crime victim while riding the light rail in Charlotte is very slim, and the presence of cameras adds a crime deterrent (though something like that is not a deterrent for someone who is severally mentally ill and capable of committing a random act of violence without much, if any, thought or fear of consequence).

The one thing that the city can do to further address safety concerns with regard to the light rail, however, is having security personnel check fares at every stop. The way it works now (or at least before this incident) is that fares are checked randomly. And based on my experience, they are very rarely checked. People constantly board the train without paying the fare.

As I understand it, the killer here did not pay the fare (not surprising). Had fares been checked, this particular killing never would have happened. Granted, there very well may have been another victim; perhaps somebody sitting at whatever light rail stop he entered the train from. But I do think it’s most likely that virtually any crime committed on the light rail is committed by someone who boarded the train without paying the fare.
 
The guy had 14 arrests, multiple that were violent in nature, and did only 5 years for armed robbery in 2014.

This is an issue because it's perceived as yet another Democrat "soft on crime" situation.

Dems will counter by claiming it's all about race for Republicans...
This is where disinformation/misinformation comes in to affect a narrative along with people not taking the time to understand how things work.

With regard to the robbery conviction, he was sentenced to a minimum term of 6 years, 1 month. That is the highest minimum term he could legally receive for a robbery with a dangerous weapon conviction under North Carolina Structured Sentencing absent a finding of a statutory aggravating factor (which can be found only by either the defendant’s admission/stipulation in court or by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, if one exists at all). The sentence he received also consisted of the highest possible maximum term of 8 years, 4 months. (In NC, you go into prison facing the maximum sentence but you have the opportunity to work it down to minimum term— and no less than that— upon completion of rehabilitative and vocational courses, through doing jobs while incarcerated, and by avoiding too many/certain kinds of disciplinary infractions).

As for the other arrests, most of them were for misdemeanors, including things like misusing 911 and disorderly conduct. Those are not charges that anyone is going to sit around in jail for. I also believe that the “14 arrests” referenced are actually referring to 14 charges vs. arrests. In other words, he wasn’t arrested 14 separate times. He was arrested fewer times, and some of those times he faced multiple related charges.

As for the assault charges, they were misdemeanors. If you have any familiarity with how things generally work with those types of charges, the prosecuting witnesses typically don’t want to have anything to do with charges after the arrest. They frequently duck subpoenas and don’t show up to court if they are served with a subpoena. I cannot say for certain any of that happened with his assault charges, but I do think it is very safe to assume that that is exactly what happened. In my 20 years of experience, it occurs much more often than not.
 


Trump: “ For most of our country’s history, the Bible was found in every classroom in the nation, yet in many classrooms today students are indoctrinated with anti-religious propaganda and some are even punished for their religious beliefs very, very strongly punished, it’s RIDICULOUS. …”
 


“… Conservative political figures including Trump’s deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, have shared footage of the deadly attack and used it to paint Democrats as “soft on crime.”

Billionaire Elon Musk published several social-media posts about the attack, calling for expedited death penalty sentences in cases with “unequivocal guilt.”

Charlotte’s mayor, Vi Lyles, and North Carolina’s governor, Josh Stein, are Democrats.

Police arrested the suspect, Decarlos Brown Jr., 34, and charged him with first degree murder. …”
 
I occasionally go on my X account, which just exists, but doesn't have any posts and doesn't follow anything, to see what gets shared. It's a lot of fucked up shit. The Charlotte subway attack is the current thing being pushed. And the way it is being explored is nearly as vile as the act it himself.
 
This is where disinformation/misinformation comes in to affect a narrative along with people not taking the time to understand how things work.

With regard to the robbery conviction, he was sentenced to a minimum term of 6 years, 1 month. That is the highest minimum term he could legally receive for a robbery with a dangerous weapon conviction under North Carolina Structured Sentencing absent a finding of a statutory aggravating factor (which can be found only by either the defendant’s admission/stipulation in court or by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, if one exists at all). The sentence he received also consisted of the highest possible maximum term of 8 years, 4 months. (In NC, you go into prison facing the maximum sentence but you have the opportunity to work it down to minimum term— and no less than that— upon completion of rehabilitative and vocational courses, through doing jobs while incarcerated, and by avoiding too many/certain kinds of disciplinary infractions).

As for the other arrests, most of them were for misdemeanors, including things like misusing 911 and disorderly conduct. Those are not charges that anyone is going to sit around in jail for. I also believe that the “14 arrests” referenced are actually referring to 14 charges vs. arrests. In other words, he wasn’t arrested 14 separate times. He was arrested fewer times, and some of those times he faced multiple related charges.

As for the assault charges, they were misdemeanors. If you have any familiarity with how things generally work with those types of charges, the prosecuting witnesses typically don’t want to have anything to do with charges after the arrest. They frequently duck subpoenas and don’t show up to court if they are served with a subpoena. I cannot say for certain any of that happened with his assault charges, but I do think it is very safe to assume that that is exactly what happened. In my 20 years of experience, it occurs much more often than not.
I don't disagree. AZ has a minimum of 7 years. DC is 5. Texas is 5.

Nothing seems out of the ordinary.
This is where disinformation/misinformation comes in to affect a narrative along with people not taking the time to understand how things work.

With regard to the robbery conviction, he was sentenced to a minimum term of 6 years, 1 month. That is the highest minimum term he could legally receive for a robbery with a dangerous weapon conviction under North Carolina Structured Sentencing absent a finding of a statutory aggravating factor (which can be found only by either the defendant’s admission/stipulation in court or by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, if one exists at all). The sentence he received also consisted of the highest possible maximum term of 8 years, 4 months. (In NC, you go into prison facing the maximum sentence but you have the opportunity to work it down to minimum term— and no less than that— upon completion of rehabilitative and vocational courses, through doing jobs while incarcerated, and by avoiding too many/certain kinds of disciplinary infractions).

As for the other arrests, most of them were for misdemeanors, including things like misusing 911 and disorderly conduct. Those are not charges that anyone is going to sit around in jail for. I also believe that the “14 arrests” referenced are actually referring to 14 charges vs. arrests. In other words, he wasn’t arrested 14 separate times. He was arrested fewer times, and some of those times he faced multiple related charges.

As for the assault charges, they were misdemeanors. If you have any familiarity with how things generally work with those types of charges, the prosecuting witnesses typically don’t want to have anything to do with charges after the arrest. They frequently duck subpoenas and don’t show up to court if they are served with a subpoena. I cannot say for certain any of that happened with his assault charges, but I do think it is very safe to assume that that is exactly what happened. In my 20 years of experience, it occurs much more often than not.
I don't disagree with any of that. I've seen it reported as 14 arrests in multiple places, but you can't add up a bunch of misdemeanors and put someone away for years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top