Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Register Log in

CURRENT EVENTS July 6 - *

ChileG said:
I didn’t see where you said tracked by FBI, just tracked.
Click to expand...
We were talking about what Trump did with crime surveys at a federal level. If we don't track crimes against schizophrenics, bipolar, etc at a federal level, it's understandable, or at least not horribly offensive, to not track gender dysphoria crimes.

It was really that simple.

Nicole Scherzinger Television GIF
 
ZenMode said:
We were talking about what Trump did with crime surveys at a federal level. If we don't track crimes against schizophrenics, bipolar, etc at a federal level, it's understandable, or at least not horribly offensive, to not track gender dysphoria crimes.

It was really that simple.

200.gif
Click to expand...
Yeah, my misunderstanding from a cursory reading.
But the FBI does track hate crimes, including those motivated by bias against gender and also gender identity.
Also pretty simple.
 
UNCatTech said:
One last thing, why didn't you respond to the belief that we shouldn't allow fellons to run for office, since NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!?
Click to expand...

It's public record whether a candidate for office has been convicted of a felony. Let the voters educate themselves as to the nature and circumstanced of the felony conviction of the candidate and make a decision. Leave it up to the voters. That's what happened in November. "Convicted felon" was the battle cry of the Dems/media in the last election. The public considered the charge and decided to elect him anyway.
 
Last edited:
CFordUNC said:
Yeah, you know, I’m pretty certain the public didn’t intend to elect a pedophile. You may have, as that kind of thing seems right up your alley, but I doubt a lot of non-MAGAts intended to elect a child rapist.
Click to expand...
You keep going on and on about Trump being a pedophile like people actually believe it (trying to make "fetch" a thing?). Are you telling me that if there was evidence of him being a pedophile in the Epstein report, Obama or the Autopen wouldn't have released the evidence during their terms of office?
 
Ramrouser said:
You keep going on and on about Trump being a pedophile like people actually believe it (trying to make "fetch" a thing?). Are you telling me that if there was evidence of him being a pedophile in the Epstein report, Obama or the Autopen wouldn't have released the evidence during their terms of office?
Click to expand...
I don’t know if he is a pedophile but he obviously has committed sex crimes, including sexual assault. We know this because he has bragged about it.
But I realize sexual assault isn’t bad enough to not vote for a Republican for you guys. What would be?
 
korgguy1971 said:
Guw8_D2WEAAifFE.jpeg

ETA: this is that political cartoon from a tweet someone posted the other day, but with the image extracted for convenience. Still pretty spot-on.
Click to expand...
In an earlier post a few days ago, I suggested if Trump was going to lie about gas prices, he should go all in with the big lie, claim gas was now 50 cents/gallon and say we haven't seen that in last 60 years.
 
Ramrouser said:
You keep going on and on about Trump being a pedophile like people actually believe it (trying to make "fetch" a thing?). Are you telling me that if there was evidence of him being a pedophile in the Epstein report, Obama or the Autopen wouldn't have released the evidence during their terms of office?
Click to expand...
Just say that you like kiddie diddlers, chief. It’ll make you feel better to get it off your chest. Maybe you yourself are into that kind of thing, I don’t know. You do seem to seem to have a particularly bizarre obsession with trans people. It doesn’t take too much of a leap in logic to get there- we call it “projection”

But yeah, it’s obvious that Trump is in the Epstein files as someone who was a serial rapist of pre-pubescent teenagers. Not even up for debate anymore at this point, really. The main question is, which Democrats are in there, too? And why did the previous Democratic administration hide it?

The difference in you and I, though, is that I want to know each and every single Democrat who was in there- because I want l them all thrown under the jail to rot, and then I want the jail to rot on top of them. You, on the other hand, will continue to gargle Trump’s sack despite his being a child rapist. We ain’t the same, hoss.
 
Ramrouser said:
You keep going on and on about Trump being a pedophile like people actually believe it (trying to make "fetch" a thing?). Are you telling me that if there was evidence of him being a pedophile in the Epstein report, Obama or the Autopen wouldn't have released the evidence during their terms of office?
Click to expand...
Well, you're right he hasn't been indicted for committing federal sex crimes. I'd be fine focusing only on the crimes committed by indicted felons, which wouldn't include Biden, Obama or either of the Clintons, but would include Trump and Ray Smith. Deal?
 
Ramrouser said:
It's public record whether a candidate for office has been convicted of a felony. Let the voters educate themselves as to the nature and circumstanced of the felony conviction of the candidate and make a decision. Leave it up to the voters. That's what happened in November. "Convicted felon" was the battle cry of the Dems/media in the last election. The public considered the charge and decided to elect him anyway.
Click to expand...
I disagree. We need guidelines to insure that incompetent baboons who's greatest accomplishment in life is being born on third base are simple not allowed to run if they are convicted criminals, especially fraudsters.


You only posted this because you voted for the fellon, if the fellon were a Democrat you wouldn't want it left up to the voters.
 
lawtig02 said:
Well, you're right he hasn't been indicted for committing federal sex crimes. I'd be fine focusing only on the crimes committed by indicted felons, which wouldn't include Biden, Obama or either of the Clintons, but would include Trump and Ray Smith. Deal?
Click to expand...
So your position is that anyone who is indicted of a crime is guilty? Sorta changes the ole “innocent until proven guilty” idea that we’ve had in the country but you go with it if you want.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top