FEDERAL WORKERS ARE FACING A NEW REALITY
The problem for government employees isn’t just low morale. It’s the manufactured chaos.
“… I spoke with 24 employees at 14 federal agencies for this story, most of whom are still employed and have requested anonymity for fear of retaliation from the Trump administration. Uniting them is an overwhelming sense of despair. “We’re all in public service because we like helping people,” one Missouri-based Social Security employee told me. “What they’re trying to do is break our spirit.”
… Federal workers are accustomed to the quadrennial ebb and flow of agency leadership and the accompanying shifts in priorities. But this time, “it’s like a psyop—they’re after you; you’re the enemy,” a senior Foreign Service officer stationed abroad told me.
The problem isn’t just the low morale. It’s the dysfunction.
… Other researchers studying cancer, neurological disorders, and developmental dysfunction haven’t been able to access the lab animals they need for genetic testing. “We have the capacity for literally millions of mice on campus,” a federal contractor at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) told me (later updating the estimate to “thousands”), “and currently, there’s only one person left on campus who’s allowed to order animals. They fired the rest.”
On Thursday, NIH employees received an email indicating that their purchasing authority would soon be restored. “Huge relief,” a senior scientist at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) texted me. But given the budget cuts, hiring freeze, and personnel shortage, the scientist added, that “doesn’t mean things are back to normal.”
…
One of the crown jewels of American government—the world-renowned research-and-development capacity that, back in 1989, discovered the hepatitis C virus and earlier this month
announced progress on a breakthrough cancer treatment—is losing its luster. The United States is on the cusp of an unprecedented brain drain: Thanks to
other actions by the Trump administration, academic posts are scarce, and the private-sector job pool is already swollen with government refugees. Established NIH scientists told me that they’ve been counseling younger scientists, students, and recent graduates to seek work abroad, where government funding for research is more reliable. “People won’t come here to train; they’ll go to Europe,” the NIH retiree told me. “And China is going to kick our ass.”
For him, the stakes of this upheaval are obvious: “How I lost my job is trivial compared to the fact that people will die because of this.”
… At the CDC, administration officials have also ordered federal workers to remove not only their pronouns from professional accounts, but also relevant degrees and qualifications and nonapproved pictures, according to one contractor there. A second Foreign Service officer told me that his team was asked to remove any use of the singular
they, in favor of
s/he, and
their, in favor of
his/her.
That’s in addition to the work of scanning and scrubbing webpages, grants, and contracts for any mention of DEI-related words. (An incomplete list reviewed by
The New York Times last month
suggested that banned words should include such contentious terms as
historically and
women.)
… Across the government, hundreds of human-resources staffers—including those whose entire job is to manage employee-retirement benefits—have been dismissed, portending trouble for the unprecedented wave of forced retirees. Where it may once have taken a few weeks for an employee to start receiving benefits, some expect it will now take six months or more.
… Many of the scientists at the NIH could find work in the private sector. They could make a higher salary working in agriscience or the pharmaceutical industry, but they’re devoted to the kind of high-risk, high-reward research that only federal resources can facilitate. “It’s one of the things that really made me patriotic—that America was the leader of this,” the Bethesda-based NIH scientist told me, before pausing for a moment.
He and so many of the employees who remain are wrestling with a dilemma: Get out now, and spare themselves several more years of stress and contempt—or stay, to keep plugging away on the projects to which they have dedicated, in some cases, most of their life.
“You’ve talked to a lot of people,” the scientist said to me at last. “What do
you think is the right thing to do?” …”