DOGE Catch-All | DOGE ledger “riddled with errors”

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 21K
  • Politics 

IMG_4861.jpeg

2023:

Ex-GOP student leader's links to Jan. 6 Capitol riot and a neo-Nazi web site​


“… The security footage is among videos released during the trial of another Jan. 6 participant, a member of the Proud Boys prosecuted for seditious conspiracy. In it, and in other photos from the day, his face remains partly concealed behind the mask.

But all signs point to Oliver Krvaric, a young Republican star and scion of a powerful GOP family from San Diego. Krvaric is most notable for his job at the time of the riot.

A USA TODAY review of arrests concluded Krvaric would be the first full-time employee of the Trump administration identified entering the Capitol in the insurrection. On Jan. 6, 2021, Krvaric was working for the Office of Personnel Management on a short-lived Trump executive order that sought to rid federal agencies of certain diversity and inclusion training.

By then, the 22-year-old had built a public persona as an up-and-coming student GOP leader. Even earlier than that, his name had been used to create an identity on a site for white supremacists.


As for the online persona, an email address in Krvaric’s first and middle names was used in 2016 to create a profile on a neo-Nazi website. That user praised Adolf Hitler, backed deportation of non-white people and expressed disgust of the LGBTQ+ population.

Kvaric said he did not recall the posts. He did not deny making them, and said he did “not particularly” recognize the email address behind them. …”
 

Inside Trump and Musk’s Clumsy, ‘Exhausting’ Hunt for Leakers

Across the federal government, Trump, Musk, and their allies are trying to snuff out a geyser of press leaks with bullying and snitch networks

"...One of the things Musk and Trump have discussed, according to a source familiar with the situation and another person briefed on it, is the geyser of leaks coming from the administration and the need to identify, root out, and persecute the leakers.

... Musk is not hiding his interest in purging the federal government of anti-Trump leakers — with or without proof. “With regard to leakers: if in doubt, they are out,” he posted on X at 2:10 a.m. ET on Monday.

The world’s richest man and Trump’s interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ed Martin have both publicly threatened action against people posting the identities of those involved with Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) team, which is spearheading the efforts to bulldoze agencies and any checks on their power.

... Among the ideas internally kicked around the Trump and Musk teams was the thought of planting younger informers or “spies” in different parts of the federal government to gain the trust of offices and teams suspected of anti-MAGA sentiments.

(The Trump administration has already sought in other ways to erect a snitch network across the federal bureaucracy, encouraging staffers to anonymously tip off their superiors if they see any hint of hush-hush diversity programs operating in the shadows.)

Other ideas include potentially accessing, via virtual back-door access, some staffers’ government emails or communications to see if there’s any recent evidence of leaking to the media, though sources generally concede that it is unlikely career officials would be using their work accounts for these kinds of sensitive and unauthorized conversations.

Other plans focus on Trump administration officials sending different staffers different internal messages or pieces of disinformation, to see what does or doesn’t leak — in the hopes of isolating where some of the leaking could be stemming from. ..."
 

“Very simply put, here’s what I believe happened: In the process of accumulating enormous wealth, the tech-oligarchs created the conditions for their loss of social power and, when they realized this, they got a big dose of class consciousness and turned furiously reactionary.”
 
So does rule of the people include getting rid of the Electoral College? Musk is defending his own actions as the will of the people (an election, even though he was not elected). So wouldn't the actual will of the people be the majority of voters? So he sees Trump's first term as being fraudulent? Not of the will of the people?
 
So does rule of the people include getting rid of the Electoral College? Musk is defending his own actions as the will of the people (an election, even though he was not elected). So wouldn't the actual will of the people be the majority of voters? So he sees Trump's first term as being fraudulent? Not of the will of the people?
Das Volk <> "the people" and we know exactly which one of those the fascists always mean.
 
It would be interesting to watch him unravel real time if he didn’t hold our entire government hostage to his ketamine-fueled fever dreams.

Also, W, the shareholders of his companies are complicit / collaborators at this point — they are not holding him accountable for obvious dereliction of duty in his other obligations because they hope to reap the benefits of his corrupt take-over of the U.S. government.

 
It would be interesting to watch him unravel real time if he didn’t hold our entire government hostage to his ketamine-fueled fever dreams.

Also, W, the shareholders of his companies are complicit / collaborators at this point — they are not holding him accountable for obvious dereliction of duty in his other obligations because they hope to reap the benefits of his corrupt take-over of the U.S. government.


Big LOL. Not even remotely the same. No one does false equivalence like the GQP.
 

I guess Veronica would rather tax dollars go where biden was spending them.


Tell me zzl, which of these do you feel is a good use of your tax dollars:

Here is the list of USAID expenses:

This would certainly be a trump win right? Can't find the "atta boy trump thread". Guessing you guys didn't add to it while I was out of town.
 

In three previous years under Biden, USAID spent no money on condoms in the entire Middle East: A detailed federal report published last year said USAID did not provide or fund any condoms in the Middle East in the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years.

The report, noted by The Guardian on Tuesday, said the only Middle East contraceptives provided or funded by USAID during that three-year period went to the country of Jordan in fiscal 2023. This was “a small order of injectables and progestin-only contraceptive pills” totaling about $46,000.

Total worldwide USAID condom spending is far less than $50 million: In the 2023 fiscal year, USAID provided or funded a global total of about $7.1 million worth of male condoms and about $1.1 million worth of female condoms, overwhelmingly to countries in Africa, according to the federal report.

In other words, Leavitt was essentially claiming Tuesday that the Biden administration had decided to provide more than six times the 2023 worldwide value of condoms to a single tiny territory that has about 2.1 million people and that is in a region that usually does not receive condoms from the US.
 
Back
Top