DOGE Catch-All | Musk is an Insider Threat with sysadmin access to everything

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 19K
  • Politics 
It just shows how bad and WASTEFUL the legislation was in the first place - which we said at the time it was passed. I understand what you're saying about appropriated funds but this "stuff" is real hard to defend.

The President, as chief executive, has some discretion in the way these appropriated funds are distributed.
1. "in the way" is not the same as "whether."
2. The President did exercise that discretion. Joe Biden was president at the time. It doesn't matter if you disagree with him. His actions were lawful. They cannot be undone because Trump just wants to. Imagine how things would go if one administration just gets to undo everything the previous one does because of simple disagreement?
3. None of it is hard to defend. What's hard to defend is your refusal to acknowledge the problem of climate change, which is why you just ignore it and lash out at women.
 
So we "solve" climate change by dolling out billions of dollars to a Stacey Abrams "non profit" whose entire revenue, prior to the grant, was $100. Seems legit. This is why most Americans support the sledgehammer actions of DOGE. There may be some mistakes (gotta break eggs to make an omelette) and you can nit pick certain decisions, but he's getting the job done.
 
So we "solve" climate change by dolling out billions of dollars to a Stacey Abrams "non profit" whose entire revenue, prior to the grant, was $100. Seems legit. This is why most Americans support the sledgehammer actions of DOGE. There may be some mistakes (gotta break eggs to make an omelette) and you can nit pick certain decisions, but he's getting the job done.
Where are you getting that most Americans support DOGE?

 
but he's getting the job done.
It is not remotely clear that DOGE is getting any job done. Everything they purport to report about "savings" ends up being shown to be dramatically wrong within a matter of days, if not hours. They've lied and made mistakes about so many things that I find it hard to believe that anyone would think Musk's claims of savings are credible.
 
So we "solve" climate change by dolling out billions of dollars to a Stacey Abrams "non profit" whose entire revenue, prior to the grant, was $100. Seems legit. This is why most Americans support the sledgehammer actions of DOGE. There may be some mistakes (gotta break eggs to make an omelette) and you can nit pick certain decisions, but he's getting the job done.
Foolish take
 
As of last week 300 African children (and rising) will be born with AIDS because of the pause in USAID. 90 of them will die before their first birthday.
But hey, gotta break some eggs (let children die), right?
Actually, no, that didn’t have to happen. They can investigate fraud without halting lifesaving aid. So, these broken eggs (dead children) didn’t have to be broken. But, hey, when has a trite cliche ever been wrong?
 
So we "solve" climate change by dolling out billions of dollars to a Stacey Abrams "non profit" whose entire revenue, prior to the grant, was $100. Seems legit. This is why most Americans support the sledgehammer actions of DOGE. There may be some mistakes (gotta break eggs to make an omelette) and you can nit pick certain decisions, but he's getting the job done.
just another coalition of radical left wing organizations dead set on helping underserved urban and rural communities

 
Last edited:
As of last week 300 African children (and rising) will be born with AIDS because of the pause in USAID. 90 of them will die before their first birthday.
But hey, gotta break some eggs (let children die), right?
Actually, no, that didn’t have to happen. They can investigate fraud without halting lifesaving aid. So, these broken eggs (dead children) didn’t have to be broken. But, hey, when has a trite cliche ever been wrong?
PEPFAR was given a waiver and is being administrated by the State Department.
 
So we "solve" climate change by dolling out billions of dollars to a Stacey Abrams "non profit" whose entire revenue, prior to the grant, was $100. Seems legit. This is why most Americans support the sledgehammer actions of DOGE. There may be some mistakes (gotta break eggs to make an omelette) and you can nit pick certain decisions, but he's getting the job done.
What do you think Facebook's revenue was when it was first founded? The whole point of venture capital is to provide capital for people who have great talent and ideas but need money to make things happen. If you want to criticize the grant, then criticize the people involved. If the administration gave a bunch of money to some radio DJs with no management experience and no subject matter expertise, then it would be stupid and that would be true whether the revenue was $100 or $100K.

As stated, your point is nonsensical.

Trump has gotten zero done. Most of what he's done is illegal and will be reversed (unless Trump decides to ignore court orders, which would break America irretrievably and we wouldn't have an omelet at the end). What hasn't been illegal has accomplished almost nothing. Woo hoo, he laid off a bunch of people, most of whom perform useful and even necessary function, and in the process saved . . . $1B. The ratio of that saving to the federal budget is like a couple of seconds to a month. Would you call it a huge efficiency gain if you managed to shave 0.05 seconds off your morning commute?
 
just another coalition of radical left wing organizations dead set on helping underserved urban and rural communities


Hahahahahahah. $100 in revenue and receive a grant for $2 billion. Should be a 50 page thread on here talking about the possible shenanigans going on here between the jill administration and abrams. Can't wait to read all the concern that was voiced in the elon threads because there aren't any hypocrites on the zzl.
 


“…
That’s why a team from Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency headed straight for O.P.M., dragging in sofa beds to sleep on so they could be there round the clock. O.P.M. is root access to the entire United States government.

With that kind of access, even a small team can search the entire government for employees whose job titles contain suggestions of wrongthink, or who might resist takeovers or wield bureaucratic tools to slow the pace of change.

In effect, this small DOGE crew has become sysadmins for the entire government. Soon after O.P.M., they descended on the Treasury Department, where every payment the government has made is stored: root access to the economy (including many companies that are direct competitors to those of Musk). Their efforts expanded recently to the I.R.S. and Social Security Administration, both of which hold extremely personal, sensitive information: root access to practically the entire American population.

The Atlantic reports that a former Tesla engineer appointed as the director of the Technology Transformation Services — a little-known entity that runs digital services for many parts of the government — has requested “privileged access” to 19 different I.T. systems reportedly without even completing a background check, making him less vetted than the person delivering pizza to that mine.

…All this has merged with and amplified another kind of insider threat brewing for decades on the political side: the expansion of unchecked executive power.

“With money we will get men, said Caesar, and with men we will get money,” Thomas Jefferson once wrote, to warn against the ways that what he called elective despotism can become a self-feeding cycle.

He had feared that an elected authoritarian would not just pulverize the institutions meant to limit his power, but take them over to wield as weapons, thus further entrenching himself. …”
 


“…
That’s why a team from Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency headed straight for O.P.M., dragging in sofa beds to sleep on so they could be there round the clock. O.P.M. is root access to the entire United States government.

With that kind of access, even a small team can search the entire government for employees whose job titles contain suggestions of wrongthink, or who might resist takeovers or wield bureaucratic tools to slow the pace of change.

In effect, this small DOGE crew has become sysadmins for the entire government. Soon after O.P.M., they descended on the Treasury Department, where every payment the government has made is stored: root access to the economy (including many companies that are direct competitors to those of Musk). Their efforts expanded recently to the I.R.S. and Social Security Administration, both of which hold extremely personal, sensitive information: root access to practically the entire American population.

The Atlantic reports that a former Tesla engineer appointed as the director of the Technology Transformation Services — a little-known entity that runs digital services for many parts of the government — has requested “privileged access” to 19 different I.T. systems reportedly without even completing a background check, making him less vetted than the person delivering pizza to that mine.

…All this has merged with and amplified another kind of insider threat brewing for decades on the political side: the expansion of unchecked executive power.

“With money we will get men, said Caesar, and with men we will get money,” Thomas Jefferson once wrote, to warn against the ways that what he called elective despotism can become a self-feeding cycle.

He had feared that an elected authoritarian would not just pulverize the institutions meant to limit his power, but take them over to wield as weapons, thus further entrenching himself. …”

“…
It’s not a choice between efficiency and manila folders in underground mines. There have been plenty of promising efforts to develop digital technologies that preserve our privacy while delivering its conveniences. They have names like zero-knowledge proofs, federated learning, differential privacy, secure enclaves, homomorphic encryption, but chances are you’ve never heard of any of them. In the rush to create newer, faster, more monetizable technologies — and to enable the kind of corporate empires whose chief executives stood beside Donald Trump at his inauguration — privacy and safety regulations seemed like a bore.

Now we are stuck with a system that offers equal efficiency to those who wish to exercise the legitimate functions of government and those who wish to dismantle it, or to weaponize it for their own ends. There doesn’t even seem to be a mechanism to learn who has gained access to what database with what privileges. Judges are asking and not always getting clear answers.

The only ones who know are the sysadmins, and they’re not saying.”
 
Back
Top