DOGE Catch-All

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 809
  • Views: 26K
  • Politics 
🎁 —> The Trump Administration Is About to Incinerate 500 Tons of Emergency Food

“… Sometime near the end of the Biden administration, USAID spent about $800,000 on the high-energy biscuits, one current and one former employee at the agency told me. The biscuits, which cram in the nutritional needs of a child under 5, are a stopgap measure, often used in scenarios where people have lost their homes in a natural disaster or fled a war faster than aid groups could set up a kitchen to receive them. They were stored in a Dubai warehouse and intended to go to the children this year.

Since January, when the Trump administration issued an executive order that halted virtually all American foreign assistance, federal workers have sent the new political leaders of USAID repeated requests to ship the biscuits while they were useful, according to the two USAID employees. USAID bought the biscuits intending to have the World Food Programme distribute them, and under previous circumstances, career staff could have handed off the biscuits to the United Nations agency on their own. But since Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency disbanded USAID and the State Department subsumed the agency, no money or aid items can move without the approval of the new heads of American foreign assistance, several current and former USAID employees told me.

… Over the coming weeks, the food will be destroyed at a cost of $130,000 to American taxpayers (on top of the $800,000 used to purchase the biscuits), according to current and former federal aid workers I spoke with. One current USAID staffer told me he’d never seen anywhere near this many biscuits trashed over his decades working in American foreign aid. Sometimes food isn’t stored properly in warehouses, or a flood or a terrorist group complicates deliveries; that might result in, at most, a few dozen tons of fortified foods being lost in a given year. But several of the aid workers I spoke with reiterated that they have never before seen the U.S. government simply give up on food that could have been put to good use.“
Sorry, I screwed up the original attempt to share the gift link. Think I’ve got it fixed now.

 
This is infuriating, but unless I'm mistaken, we've been paying red state farmers billions of dollars per year for decades now for product that we've subsequently destroyed. I'm more than happy to pay a substantial subsidy to remain relatively food independent. But for fuck's sake, can't we figure out a way to put our agricultural surplus to use rather than letting it rot in the barn???
They don't usually destroy the food. It's usually just not grown thereby artificially suppressing supply.
 

DOGE-flation: DOGE’s actual savings are a fraction of what it claims​

A POLITICO analysis of DOGE data reveals the organization saved less than 5 percent of its claimed savings from nearly 10,100 contract terminations.


“…Through July, DOGE said it has saved taxpayers $52.8 billion by canceling contracts, but of the $32.7 billion in actual claimed contract savings that POLITICO could verify, DOGE’s savings over that period were closer to $1.4 billion.

Despite the administration’s claims, not a single one of those 1.4 billion dollars will lower the federal deficit unless Congress steps in. Instead, the money has been returned to agencies mandated by law to spend it.…”
 
Are you sure? The way you typed Mr Yellow Jacket earlier makes me think you really aren't that interested.
I can handle the truth. ;)

If you have evidence for a different take on whether food is destroyed when there's a surplus, I'd like to know. I honestly have no idea.
 
Back
Top