KishiKaisei
Distinguished Member
- Messages
- 349
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not only would I not buy one, I find it exceptionally hard not to personally judge people I see in Teslas at this point. I know many of them made a choice based on the vehicle but I can't separate that from the cataclysmic asshole that runs the company.Yeah, but surely you’ll make an exception for this:
I saw one pull into the Harris Teeter parking lot at Carr Mill in Carrboro.I've seen a handful of those new Tesla trucks around my town, and I'm sorry, but they're just incredibly ugly, imo. I don't know of anyone who likes them, and I can't imagine who would find them attractive enough to fork over a good amount of cash to buy one. I guess 2 or 3 people do based on how many I've seen, but that's about it.
As Jon Stewart said, AMC Gremlins were cars designed to keep young men from having sex.
Is that a Gremlin?
Jon Stewart’s bit about AMC Gremlins was during Bruce Springsteen’s award ceremony at the Kennedy Center years ago.Is that a Gremlin?
ETA: Saw Zoo's post and it reminded me of a trip I took with four guys down to New Orleans for Mardi Gras from Southern Pines. We had a Gene Tracy truck driver tape with the farting contest and played that non-stop for close to 18 hours. I developed a deep hate for Gremlins but my brother had bought a AMC Jeep after they bought out Willy's so I still have that. I digress but thank you for those memories.
As bad as Elon is as a human, I can't think of any one person who has done more to address global warming. By providing a reasonable/superior alternative to internal combustion engines, he jump started that whole industry. In a decade or three, there will be far fewer green house gases than if he had taken his paypal money and sat on a beach knocking up women. So he has that going for him.I have a Model 3 that I bought last September. I drive 112 miles a day for work, so I was 100% buying an EV. Model 3 happened to be the most efficient with 300+ miles of range, while being affordable after the credit (would’ve gone with a Y, but I didn’t like the suspension feel). Add in that WV (at the time) didn’t have any level 3 charging for anything other than Teslas, and my choice was made. I would’ve bought a Mach E or Ioniq 5 if they had Supercharger availability at the time (and were their current prices).
Yes on one hand, but on the other:As bad as Elon is as a human, I can't think of any one person who has done more to address global warming. By providing a reasonable/superior alternative to internal combustion engines, he jump started that whole industry. In a decade or three, there will be far fewer green house gases than if he had taken his paypal money and sat on a beach knocking up women. So he has that going for him.
Each Falcon 9 first stage launch puts out the year carbon emissions of 41 cars. Still a ways to go before rockets emit more than cars, but they are also launching more rockets every month.Yes on one hand, but on the other:
Marais and a team of researchers from University College London (UCL), the University of Cambridge and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) used a 3D model to explore the impact on the atmosphere of rocket launches and re-entry in 2019, and the future impact of space tourism promoted by companies like Virgin Galactic and Blue Origin.The pollution caused by rocket launches
Rocket launches are an integral part of our 21st-Century world. But how do we stop their polluting exhausts accelerating climate change?www.bbc.com
Marais's team found that black carbon emissions will more than double after just an additional three years of space tourism launches, and that particles emitted by rockets are almost 500 times more efficient at holding heat in the atmosphere than all other sources of soot combined, resulting in an enhanced warming climate effect. While current loss of ozone due to space launches is small, the impact of space tourism launches may undermine the recovery in the ozone layer experienced after the success of the 1987 Montreal Protocol which banned substances that deplete the Earth's ozone layer.
Maloney and his team calculated that each year rocket launches that use RP-1 collectively expel around 1 gigagram, or 1,000 metric tons, of black carbon into the stratosphere. Thanks to the growing number of rockets launched, this could reach 10 gigagrams a year in a couple of decades, along with a temperature rise in parts of the stratosphere of as much as 1.5 degrees Celsius, and a thinning of the ozone layer. If the amount of black carbon expelled into the atmosphere reach 30 gigagrams a year, or even 100, then there will be some cooling of the surface of the planet under this black carbon umbrella.
For their research paper, Ioannis Kokkinakis and Dimitris Drikakis, scientists at the University of Nicosia in Cyprus, used real rocket launch data from a Space X Falcon 9 rocket in 2016 to create the "first high-resolution and high-order computational model" of its kind to analyse in detail the impact of rocket emissions on the climate. This Space X launch was chosen because useful webcam footage of the exhaust gases was available. One of the "biggest surprises" they found is that in the first stage of the rocket launch around 116 tons of CO2 was emitted in 165 seconds. "That is quite significant," says Drikakis. "Yes, we don't know the actual impact on the atmosphere because atmospheric chemistry is a very complicated matter, but when you have the cumulative effect of more launches, it is going to get interesting."
I'd have to see the research. That's a bold claim that it could double Black carbon emission.Yes on one hand, but on the other:
Marais and a team of researchers from University College London (UCL), the University of Cambridge and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) used a 3D model to explore the impact on the atmosphere of rocket launches and re-entry in 2019, and the future impact of space tourism promoted by companies like Virgin Galactic and Blue Origin.The pollution caused by rocket launches
Rocket launches are an integral part of our 21st-Century world. But how do we stop their polluting exhausts accelerating climate change?www.bbc.com
Marais's team found that black carbon emissions will more than double after just an additional three years of space tourism launches, and that particles emitted by rockets are almost 500 times more efficient at holding heat in the atmosphere than all other sources of soot combined, resulting in an enhanced warming climate effect. While current loss of ozone due to space launches is small, the impact of space tourism launches may undermine the recovery in the ozone layer experienced after the success of the 1987 Montreal Protocol which banned substances that deplete the Earth's ozone layer.
Maloney and his team calculated that each year rocket launches that use RP-1 collectively expel around 1 gigagram, or 1,000 metric tons, of black carbon into the stratosphere. Thanks to the growing number of rockets launched, this could reach 10 gigagrams a year in a couple of decades, along with a temperature rise in parts of the stratosphere of as much as 1.5 degrees Celsius, and a thinning of the ozone layer. If the amount of black carbon expelled into the atmosphere reach 30 gigagrams a year, or even 100, then there will be some cooling of the surface of the planet under this black carbon umbrella.
For their research paper, Ioannis Kokkinakis and Dimitris Drikakis, scientists at the University of Nicosia in Cyprus, used real rocket launch data from a Space X Falcon 9 rocket in 2016 to create the "first high-resolution and high-order computational model" of its kind to analyse in detail the impact of rocket emissions on the climate. This Space X launch was chosen because useful webcam footage of the exhaust gases was available. One of the "biggest surprises" they found is that in the first stage of the rocket launch around 116 tons of CO2 was emitted in 165 seconds. "That is quite significant," says Drikakis. "Yes, we don't know the actual impact on the atmosphere because atmospheric chemistry is a very complicated matter, but when you have the cumulative effect of more launches, it is going to get interesting."
Same people that would drive a Humvee 20 years ago I guess
The electric one is dope af tbh lolSame people that would drive a Humvee 20 years ago I guess
One of those I hate this timeline moments.must be weird to be th erichest man in the world and still so desperate for someone, anyone to like you
Elon Musk is itching for a fight—or that’s what he says, at least. Even though he keeps ducking Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, the Tesla CEO says he’ll accept a challenge from the president of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro. No, you’re not having a fever dream.I Regret to Inform You That Elon Musk Has Accepted Nicolas Maduro’s Fight Challenge
Musk says he'll give the Venezuelan president a free ride to Mars if he loses.gizmodo.com
Venezuela is in the middle of political turmoil stemming from the country’s election results declaring Maduro the winner. On Monday, the National Electoral Council that made the call, which also happens to be composed of members of the country’s United Socialist Party that Maduro leads, declined to release any ballot info. Supporters of Maduro’s opponent, retired diplomat Edmundo González, say they have exit polls and voter tally sheets showing him winning.
Over the course of multiple posts on Monday, Musk took to his platform X to proclaim Maduro committed “major election fraud” and amplified other tweets saying the same. This led to the Venezuelan president talking trash about Musk on national TV and challenging him to a fight on Monday.