Epstein Files | Fallout continues

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 5K
  • Views: 211K
  • Politics 
nycfan said:
“… It is unclear why the materials are missing. The Justice Department said in a statement to The Times on Monday that “the only materials that have been withheld were either privileged or duplicates.” In a new statement on Tuesday, the department also noted that documents could have been withheld because of “an ongoing federal investigation.”

Officials did not directly address why the memos related to the woman’s claim were not released.

… Under the law, the Justice Department can redact material that could be used to identify Mr. Epstein’s victims, depicted violence or child sexual abuse, or would hurt a continuing federal investigation. But the law expressly prohibited federal officials from withholding or redacting materials “on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm or political sensitivity” to public figures…”
Click to expand...
It's unclear why they're missing.

Confused Donald Trump GIF
 
Funny seeing all these people resign with less evidence pointing to them as being involved with sex trafficking victims and underage girls than Trump but he's still the President of the United States.
 
nycfan said:
“… It is unclear why the materials are missing. The Justice Department said in a statement to The Times on Monday that “the only materials that have been withheld were either privileged or duplicates.” In a new statement on Tuesday, the department also noted that documents could have been withheld because of “an ongoing federal investigation.”

Officials did not directly address why the memos related to the woman’s claim were not released.

… Under the law, the Justice Department can redact material that could be used to identify Mr. Epstein’s victims, depicted violence or child sexual abuse, or would hurt a continuing federal investigation. But the law expressly prohibited federal officials from withholding or redacting materials “on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm or political sensitivity” to public figures…”
Click to expand...
“Under the law…”
Unfortunately, enforcement of the law resides squarely under the fat ass of the perpetrator.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top