Epstein Files | Fallout continues

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 5K
  • Views: 223K
  • Politics 
Well, I’m not sure how that was worth it for Republicans. Trying to be as objective as possible, I would think the most lasting thing to come out of this is the fact that if Bill Clinton was deposed, why not Trump?
 
Ramrouser said:
Yes, Bill could be the new Fetterman - tired of the liberal, woke, purple haired Dems.
Click to expand...
You change your opinion today on your insinuations related to any of these?

IMG_4205.jpeg
IMG_4206.jpegIMG_4207.jpegIMG_4208.jpeg
Do you believe you can count on Bill Clinton to tell the truth about matters related to his alleged transgressions? Or is it your rationale that Clinton was up to no good with Epstein so when he said he had no knowledge of Trump being up to no good, that had to be the case?

To be clear, I do think it’s more likely than not that Bill Clinton was telling the truth when he said that he was unaware of/did not witness Donald Trump do anything with underage girls or anyone else who was the victim of sex trafficking. I doubt much of the time he spent with Epstein overlapped with the time Trump spent with Epstein. Whether or not Trump did anything bad as it relates to Epstein, I doubt Clinton would have witnessed it or known about it if he did. So I think he was being truthful there. If someone doesn’t witness a crime or a wrongdoing, or does not have knowledge of a crime or a wrongdoing, does that mean the crime or the wrong doing could not have happened?

And you said “woke.” 🤣 Drink!
 
Icky Mettle said:
You change your opinion today on your insinuations related to any of these?

IMG_4205.jpeg
IMG_4206.jpegIMG_4207.jpegIMG_4208.jpeg
Do you believe you can count on Bill Clinton to tell the truth about matters related to his alleged transgressions? Or is it your rationale that Clinton was up to no good with Epstein so when he said he had no knowledge of Trump being up to no good, that had to be the case?

To be clear, I do think it’s more likely than not that Bill Clinton was telling the truth when he said that he was unaware of/did not witness Donald Trump do anything with underage girls or anyone else who was the victim of sex trafficking. I doubt much of the time he spent with Epstein overlapped with the time Trump spent with Epstein. Whether or not Trump did anything bad as it relates to Epstein, I doubt Clinton would have witnessed it or known about it if he did. So I think he was being truthful there. If someone doesn’t witness a crime or a wrongdoing, or does not have knowledge of a crime or a wrongdoing, does that mean the crime or the wrong doing could not have happened?

And you said “woke.” 🤣 Drink!
Click to expand...
He has to be a parody poster.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top