Epstein Files | (former) Prince Andrew, now Lord Mandelson arrested

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 5K
  • Views: 201K
  • Politics 
thebruinbleedstarheelblue said:
Funny you didn't say that with the names released by Bondi... and she had all of the information.

Here, they released what they could based on the cover-up.

It's not surprising that you're on the side of covering up these terrible crimes... I just want to understand how you got there why people like you support this crap.
Click to expand...

My previous comments:

ZenMode

Politics Post in thread 'Epstein Files | (former) Prince Andrew, now Lord Mandelson arrested'

There's a lot of irony in the Epstein files situation.

Under normal conditions, state local and federal law enforcement will investigate alleged crimes and will bring charges if there is sufficient evidence to do so, but the "files" normally don't see light of day.

Other than Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell , no charges have been brought related to the case And now we know why. They're simply isn't enough evidence to bring charges against anyone else.

What we see happening is the reason why these types of files are normally kept from the public eye. We are seeing people's lives ruined...
 
gtyellowjacket said:
Well at least you are never in doubt. Can you tell us what Mr Wexner is guilty of and what he is lying about and what led you to that conclusion?
Click to expand...
Lying under oath.

Epstein files, public information, common sense.

Continue to support your tribe...I appreciate you candor and point of view, because I don't socialize with anyone who defends, excuses the Trump/Epstein type of stuff.

Your honesty gives perspective.
 
thebruinbleedstarheelblue said:
Lying under oath.

Epstein files, public information, common sense.

Continue to support your tribe...I appreciate you candor and point of view, because I don't socialize with anyone who defends, excuses the Trump/Epstein type of stuff.

Your honesty gives perspective.
Click to expand...
I'm not following. What exactly has Mr Wexner lied about under oath? Are you saying he has lied about the Epstein files or public information or something else?
 
ZenMode said:
My previous comments:

ZenMode

Politics Post in thread 'Epstein Files | (former) Prince Andrew, now Lord Mandelson arrested'

There's a lot of irony in the Epstein files situation.

Under normal conditions, state local and federal law enforcement will investigate alleged crimes and will bring charges if there is sufficient evidence to do so, but the "files" normally don't see light of day.

Other than Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell , no charges have been brought related to the case And now we know why. They're simply isn't enough evidence to bring charges against anyone else.

What we see happening is the reason why these types of files are normally kept from the public eye. We are seeing people's lives ruined...
Click to expand...
lol thats a lot of explaining. There are only two sides of this.

You are an apologist and enabler...that segment helps with the cover-up of these and other crimes.

You lose your mind with anything trans(how does that impact you?) , but there are a lot of qualifications, clarifications, and whataboutism when it comes to Trump/Epstein/Maga turribleness...but then "hey, I said he was a bad guy!"...people like you allow this and other BS to go unchecked...

You are on here whining victim about names that came out(we don't know what they did) from a lineup... which happened because of a cover-up that you don't mention.

Own it...I'm just curious why you support that.
gtyellowjacket said:
I'm not following. What exactly has Mr Wexner lied about under oath? Are you saying he has lied about the Epstein files or public information or something else?
Click to expand...
If not familiar with his testimony and activities, you should read up before commenting more.

Its pretty easy to find.
 
thebruinbleedstarheelblue said:
lol thats a lot of explaining. There are only two sides of this.

You are an apologist and enabler...that segment helps with the cover-up of these and other crimes.

You lose your mind with anything trans(how does that impact you?) , but there are a lot of qualifications, clarifications, and whataboutism when it comes to Trump/Epstein/Maga turribleness...but then "hey, I said he was a bad guy!"...people like you allow this and other BS to go unchecked...

You are on here whining victim about names that came out(we don't know what they did) from a lineup... which happened because of a cover-up that you don't mention.

Own it...I'm just curious why you support that.

If not familiar with his testimony and activities, you should read up before commenting more.

Its pretty easy to find.
Click to expand...
I get the urge to correct these two imbeciles, but I'm sure you understand you are dealing with insincere people who at their core support MAGA no matter how much they protest otherwise.
 
thebruinbleedstarheelblue said:
If not familiar with his testimony and activities, you should read up before commenting more.

Its pretty easy to find.
Click to expand...
I'm not even sure what to look for which is why I'm asking. You're certain that he is lying. I'm just wondering what you know Mr Wexman is lying about and what makes you certain.

Then, since it's so easy to find, I'll be able to find it, and evaluate whether I agree that he is lying or not.
 
dukeman92 said:
Probably the mountains of fucking evidence and common sense. Which, obviously, isn't so common.
Click to expand...
Yeah. He keeps dancing around it. He claims that there's lots of evidence for anyone to find that Wexner lied under oath and it should be easy to find it, but he's not able to find it.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
Yeah. He keeps dancing around it. He claims that there's lots of evidence for anyone to find that Wexner lied under oath and it should be easy to find it, but he's not able to find it.
Click to expand...
Thats because you believe what you want. He only remembers the details which are convenient.

I bet you "believe" Lutnik and Trump too.

Again, I appreciate your honesty and it just shows who you are. it's just odd that you kind of try to play both sides of the fence... unless you are that naïve.

You are an apologist because you like them ...just own it. We can talk why as your perspective could add some real value to the board instead of the bullshit games that you play.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top