Epstein Files | Ghislaine Maxwell granted limited immunity for interview

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 40K
  • Politics 
Now, Trump is asking a federal judge in Miami to compel the man he once called "my very good friend Rupert Murdoch" to answer his lawyers' questions under oath within 15 days of the order. Trump's legal team acknowledges that the ink is barely dry on the lawsuit — there is no schedule of court deadlines yet — but argues that Murdoch is unlikely to testify in person whenever a trial occurs due to his advanced age and health issues.…”
We could pay down a bunch of debt by broadcasting Trump's people deposing Murdoch PPV.
 
Did anyone look at whether Maxwell had any foreign intelligence connections? I mean, I don't think it's a high likelihood in any case, but when I look at the biographies of those two and read what has been made publicly available, I think It's considerably more likely that Ghislaine was running Epstein (prob without his knowledge) than Epstein being a foreign agent.
 
Did anyone look at whether Maxwell had any foreign intelligence connections? I mean, I don't think it's a high likelihood in any case, but when I look at the biographies of those two and read what has been made publicly available, I think It's considerably more likely that Ghislaine was running Epstein (prob without his knowledge) than Epstein being a foreign agent.
Agree. Particularly given her father’s curious intelligence background.
 
Did anyone look at whether Maxwell had any foreign intelligence connections? I mean, I don't think it's a high likelihood in any case, but when I look at the biographies of those two and read what has been made publicly available, I think It's considerably more likely that Ghislaine was running Epstein (prob without his knowledge) than Epstein being a foreign agent.
Other than her father’s work with/for Mossad, you mean?

I have not seen anything credible to suggest she carried on her father’s alleged relations with Mossad (or MI6 or maybe the KGB) after he mysteriously fell off his yacht and drowned (a possible suicide once his massive embezzlement from his company’s pensions was discovered).
 
Other than her father’s work with/for Mossad, you mean?

I have not seen anything credible to suggest she carried on her father’s alleged relations with Mossad (or MI6 or maybe the KGB) after he mysteriously fell off his yacht and drowned (a possible suicide once his massive embezzlement from his company’s pensions was discovered).
Oh, I didn't even know about that. Not sure how I missed it. He also fought fascists in WWII.

I was thinking more along the lines of the Patti Hearst meets the Rosenbergs. And I don't know if the whole scheme was an spy plot or if it just became that eventually, but the conspiracy theory that rings truest to me is that Putin's Kompromat on the GOP and Dersh among others is related to Epstein. He has something.

Maybe it's like the rumored Michael X blackmail (as dramatisied in the movie The Bank Job).
 
Wasn't it just two pages ago that someone remarked that Trump answered a question in the worst way possible (from perspective of his media people)? It's so hard to imagine the depths to which Trump will stoop.

Admitting that the people Epstein brought on as sex slaves or whatever had previously worked in the Mar-A-Lago spas is probably the worst response possible. Oh, who am I kidding? It's the worst response I can think of (short of actual confession). He'll probably stoop lower twice by week's end.
 
What does the board think might be in the files now incriminating trump that wasn't there during joe's administration?
I don't presume to speak for the rest of the board but I can answer that question based on my belief. My belief is that the files have, all along, implicated Trump as being a participant in Epstein's trafficking of underage girls for sex. I don't mean that Trump was a sex trafficker, but that he simply had sex with girls whom he knew to be underage. Joe's administration was both stupid and wrong for not releasing whatever was in the files about whomever is in the files. Every single solitary person who was a participant in Epstein's escapades should have to pay a price and face justice. Every single one of them.

Ask yourself this: is it more likely or is it less likely that a person is guilty who has 1. been accused by multiple women of having had forcible sex with them when they were underage; 2. had a very well-documented relationship with Jeffrey Epstein who was sex trafficking underage women; 3. been proven to have spent time on Epstein's private plane; 4. and is currently acting like he has something to hide with regard to the release of the files? Is it more likely or less likely that there is fire to that smoke, or is it all just one big pure coincidence? If it's the latter, ask yourself whether you'd afford that same level of benefit of the doubt to a Democratic president?
 
Back
Top