Epstein Files | Ghislaine Maxwell granted limited immunity for interview

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 37K
  • Politics 
theel4life said:
This is absurd. They are actively doing a cover-up for a pedo



For fuck sakes MAGA, when will you people stop supporting this garbage human being?
Click to expand...
This one could be different Trump did some dirty things with Epstein for a long time...and he probably can't lockeroom talk this.

WSJ is going to drip drip drip and send him into more meltdowns.

Nobody will believe Maxwell.

i just think there is some bad stuff there...they're not doing all this for no reason.

Popcorn.
 
I've been watching the Epstein doc on Netflix. I find the underage girls' (at the time ) accounts to be sad and sickening. I think this is the reason Trump is in full panic mode should the unredacted files be released.

My guess is that calla and other MAGAs will have no problem with Trump's personal attorney( aka deputy AG in the DOJ ) striking a sweetheart deal with Maxwell in exchange for her making a public statement that Trump never had sex with teenage girls.
 
theel4life said:
This is absurd. They are actively doing a cover-up for a pedo



For fuck sakes MAGA, when will you people stop supporting this garbage human being?
Click to expand...
None of this is surprising. Markus is a legitimately great trial lawyer but he's also a HUGE mover and shaker in south Florida GOP circles. I don't know if he's ever represented Trump but there's a 100% chance they know each other. And Markus and Blanche go way back. In fact, Blanche was the first person Markus interviewed on his podcast last year --

www.forthedefensepodcast.com

Todd Blanche for former President Donald Trump - For the Defense with David Oscar Markus

Todd Blanche, counsel to former President Donald Trump, joins David Oscar Markus to discuss the New York trial of People v. Trump.
www.forthedefensepodcast.com www.forthedefensepodcast.com

I'm not blaming Markus for any of this unless he's doing something obviously unethical like facilitating known lies by his client. This is a great opportunity for Maxwell and they'd be crazy not to seize it. But that doesn't change the fact it's corrupt as hell from Trump and DOJ's perspective, and people like calla and Ram would have long since had coronaries if a Dem administration had ever even whispered about doing it.
 
lawtig02 said:
None of this is surprising. Markus is a legitimately great trial lawyer but he's also a HUGE mover and shaker in south Florida GOP circles. I don't know if he's ever represented Trump but there's a 100% chance they know each other. And Markus and Blanche go way back. In fact, Blanche was the first person Markus interviewed on his podcast last year --

www.forthedefensepodcast.com

Todd Blanche for former President Donald Trump - For the Defense with David Oscar Markus

Todd Blanche, counsel to former President Donald Trump, joins David Oscar Markus to discuss the New York trial of People v. Trump.
www.forthedefensepodcast.com www.forthedefensepodcast.com

I'm not blaming Markus for any of this unless he's doing something obviously unethical like facilitating known lies by his client. This is a great opportunity for Maxwell and they'd be crazy not to seize it. But that doesn't change the fact it's corrupt as hell from Trump and DOJ's perspective, and people like calla and Ram would have long since had coronaries if a Dem administration had ever even whispered about doing it.
Click to expand...
I read somewhere that Trump tried and failed to hire Markus as his defense counsel for his criminal indictments…
 
nycfan said:
I read somewhere that Trump tried and failed to hire Markus as his defense counsel for his criminal indictments…
Click to expand...
Would not surprise me. Markus is a genuinely brilliant guy. He would clearly see the perils of getting wrapped up in Trump's legal world, and also the potential of working on the periphery of it, like he's doing now.
 
While I have no doubt whatsoever the WSJ fact-checked this story to hell before publishing, I am wondering why we haven't seen the actual drawing/letter yet. I hope the WSJ does have a plan to keep this story alive over a lengthy period of time. Nothing wrong with that, and it's certainly in their best financial interest. But it seems like the image would leak out pretty soon. I'm surprised it hasn't already.
 
Maybe the picture is Trump's Damocles' Sword and Murdock is using it to maneuver Trump. Trump can't do any damage control until it's revealed and he can't reveal it without admitting it's real. Farfatched but...
 
Dead men tell no tales. The files might be fairly useless or the cases difficult to prove given this.

Horrible situation, since it is highly likely many prominent men are guilty of horrendois crimes and have walked thus far.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top