Epstein Files | Ghislaine Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 92K
  • Politics 
ChileG said:
If Trump did not suddenly care about investigating Clinton, Congress would get the files and they could start attacking immediately. So, if you want transparency, you should be wishing Trump’s investigation into Clinton gets killed quickly (is my understanding).
Click to expand...
The sooner the better. Let the carnage begin.
 
Oddball said:
There were plenty of guys who went to Epstein Island, and Trump is not one.

Howard Lutnick of all people basically admitted Epstein DID have photographic evidence of many of the rich and powerful, so yeah, there will be a good number of people with no possible explanation/excuse.
Click to expand...
Epstein had a massage table front and center in his house.
 
I feel like it is important to point out that the joke was that Trump blew Clinton. Not the other way around. We all know which one was the blower, even if this is simply a hypothetical excercise. And that is going to eat at Trump.
 
sringwal said:
I feel like it is important to point out that the joke was that Trump blew Clinton. Not the other way around. We all know which one was the blower, even if this is simply a hypothetical excercise. And that is going to eat at Trump.
Click to expand...

We’re like 72 hours away from the sitting president denying that he gave a former president a blowjob via tweet.
 

Prison employees have been terminated after Ghislaine Maxwell’s email messages were shared, her lawyer says​



“… House Judiciary Committee Democrats on Friday defended how they received and released the information and disputed that the correspondence was privileged.

“The House Judiciary Committee Minority’s letter was based on a range of documents and information shared with Committee staff by a whistleblower. None of the documents shared with the Committee from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) TRULINCS system was subject to the attorney client privilege,” a House Judiciary Democratic spokeswoman told CNN.

The spokeswoman pointed out that individuals have to accept a disclaimer that their activity will be monitored once logging into the prison’s systems. She said the disclaimer makes clear that DOJ may monitor the system and that users must consent to such monitoring and have no expectation that communications will stay private.

Pertaining to attorney client privilege specifically, the Judiciary spokeswoman said the disclaimer includes this or similar language: “I understand and consent that this provision applies to electronic messages both to and from my attorney or other legal representative, and that such electronic messages will not be treated as privileged communications, and that I have alternative methods of conducting privileged legal communication.”…”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top