Epstein Files | Ghislaine Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 75K
  • Politics 
Paine said:
It’s funny: you once messaged me to say I gave you hope for younger generations. Not sure what changed, but somewhere along the way you pivoted from hopeful to hostile.

You say you’re lifting people up, but you talk about young folks like they’re a burden or a lost cause. You dismiss their media, mock their frustrations, and then act offended when they don’t line up behind the institutions that failed them. That’s not guidance, that’s just grievance.

People didn’t stop trusting legacy media or political elites because it was trendy. They stopped because those institutions lied to them, over and over. The response wasn’t stupidity, it was just a survival instinct. You don’t have to like Von or Rogan or anyone else in that space, but writing off millions of people as dumb just because they’re not listening to NPR or reading the Times doesn’t make you right: it makes you out of touch.

If your whole project is to tell people “just be smarter,” don’t be surprised when they stop listening. That’s not mentorship, it’s moralizing. You don’t have to coddle anyone, but if you really want to help, it starts with respect, not resentment.
Click to expand...
I do respect everyone. Period. Always have and always will. I treat people kindly and always have a hand out to help. I don't moralize to anyone. I don't engage with such things for that exact reason.

I also have never once mocked the frustrations of young people. I have backed them up and advocated for them. I think young folks have been dealt a severely shitty hand.

I just wish folks like you would stop trying to pin the shortcomings of your own cohort on mine. We have enough of our own flaws to not be saddled with yours. The fact that your generation has fled to pure lies and sensationalism is every bit your own fault just as it is the fault of the Boomers who have largely done the same.

And your downdressing of me here epitomizes the problem....you're more comfortable with someone who SAYS things the way you want them said than with someone who DOES things to help.
 
Paine said:
You say you respect everyone and don’t moralize, but your tone and language toward younger people, myself included, often contradict that. You repeatedly lump us in with “lazy,” “stupid,” “TikTok crybabies,” and accuse an entire generation of fleeing to lies and sensationalism. That’s not respect, just resignation disguised as realism.

And I’m not pinning my generation’s shortcomings on yours. I’m pointing out that the institutions many liberals still instinctively defend have failed people across the board. Trust wasn’t lost because of podcast bros or influencers, it was lost because the elite consensus, across parties and decades, delivered crisis after crisis, like Iraq, Wall Street, and COVID. That disillusionment spans generations. Pretending that people fled to alternative media just because they’re stupid erases that context.

As for what you do, I genuinely appreciate your work, that’s real. IIRC, you’re an educator. But doing good things doesn’t give you a pass to constantly punch down on the people you're supposedly helping. You once said I gave you hope. I still want to live up to that. But if we’re going to have a shot at rebuilding any kind of trust or solidarity, it has to be based on mutual respect, not just the kind you say you have, but the kind that shows up in how you talk about and to people.
Click to expand...
This is the only place I talk about politics or social culture. I do zero engagement in such topics outside of here. My ability to invest time and money in helping people is entirely predicated on not being outspoken politically. My industry is probably 75% MAGA.
 
WaynetheDrain said:
I want you to take a second and really think about the dumb shit you just posted.

The director of the FBI has no business appearing on a podcast to discuss partisan politics and spew propaganda.

It wouldn’t be right under a Democratic administration, and it isn’t right now.
Click to expand...
Why not, dumb shit guy? How much of it did you listen to?
 
Last edited:
Paine said:
I get wanting people to pay attention to reality but it’s unfair to dismiss millions as lazy or stupid for losing trust in the very institutions that failed them repeatedly: Iraq, the housing crisis, the pandemic response. That trust wasn’t broken by podcasts or TikTok. It was broken by real failures at the top.

People left legacy media because it stopped earning their trust, not because it was too responsible. Criticizing them now doesn’t explain why they tuned out, it just misses the root causes.

I want to trust institutions too. It would make everything easier. But trust has to be earned not assumed. If we want better conversations and better outcomes, we need to fix the system that broke that trust instead of blaming those who are trying to navigate a broken media landscape.

You spent decades backing a political project that gutted public trust, empowered bad actors, and paved the way for the exact chaos you're now furious about. It's rich to blame podcasts and young people when the institutions you helped legitimize are the ones that failed.

People aren't turning to alternative media because they’re lazy or stupid, they’re doing it because the establishment, including the one you supported, broke its contract with the public. That frustration didn't come out of nowhere. You helped create it. Maybe sit with that before lecturing everyone else about intelligence or responsibility.
Click to expand...
I enjoy and appreciate your posts.

You are leaping to conclusions here and heaping blame on people who don’t deserve it.

Plenty of people wmheel’s age (47) and my age (63) and finesse’s age (67ish) and into their 70’s and ‘80’s have fought long-and-hard to advance freedom, education, healthcare, civil rights, economic growth in poorer areas, and more.

In the ‘70’s and ‘80’s, in North Carolina, Jesse Helms and his Congressional Club, and Helms and Reagan nationally, helped turn Liberal into a pejorative…….this helped some Americans equate Liberal with Marxist. The GOP continues to do this today.

They and others helped promote the idea that not supporting massive defense spending equaled being anti-American.

George McGovern ran as a hardcore Liberal in 1972. He was CRUSHED. Walter Mondale ran as a hardcore Liberal in 1984. He was CRUSHED. Mike Dukakis ran as a technocrat Liberal (Massachusetts Miracle) in 1988. He was crushed. Bill Clinton ran as a centrist……maybe as a neoliberal (whatever that means). Clinton won. Twice. Then we nominated two of the country’s most boring people and lost…….then Obama…..he won twice….then we nominated the third most boring person, Hillary. She lost.

If you can skip through the 2002 elections and see how not being openly in favor of invading Iraq was a virtual political death sentence (see Max Cleland), you aren’t looking.

Iraq is on the GOP. Not enough resources in Afghanistan because we invaded Iraq is on the GOP.

The Dubya tax cuts are on the GOP.

The Great Recession is on the GOP.

The GOP BULLSHIT surrounding Obamacare is on the GOP.

Trump’s 2017 tax cuts are on the GOP.

The Trump Administration’s shitty response to Covid is on the GOP.

That a huge number of Americans Bo-side all this is THEIR fault.

Only ignoramuses and hard-core Leftists blame Center-Left, Center, or Center-Right Democrats (remember, it’s 2025, Center-Right Democrats are not Republicans, not even Never Trump Republicans).
 
ColdBlueSteel said:
Why not, dumb shit guy? How much of it did you listen to?
Click to expand...
I don't listen to Theo Von's or Joe Rogan’s podcast because I still have some brain cells that function. Apparently, this isn't a problem for you.

Pro-tip for the future: Don't mock mass media and CNN in the same post that you applaud a podcaster that deals in misinformation. It makes you look like a fucking clown.

I'll repeat this again for you because you're slow: An FBI director has no business appearing on podcasts, no matter which side of the political spectrum he or she falls on. Period.
 
Last edited:
I wish I was only 67. I'm 73.

Paine, you're still throwing the baby out with the bathwater. You and I have a very different view of what an expert actually is and you imply it's your whole generation. To me, an expert is someone who is in a profession that has standards of education and certification. They have ethical standards and they have peer reviews and publications where their results are read, judged and criticized. The press and pundits definitely don't qualify. Neither do lawyers, but mainly because what the law is is so subjective. Where have these experts misled you? That you have let other people interpret these things for you and convince you that their spin is actually true when the same press, pundits and politicians have knowingly lied to you for damned near a century puts a lot of onus on your generation.

Saying a plague on both houses and refusing to help when one party has repeatedly tried to drag us in the right direction while the other party is conducting a campaign of lies and subversion is really not a very pragmatic approach. It's a hell of a lot easier to reach what you want when the country is heading in generally the right direction. The left's foot dragging has hurt everyone. Really, what actual policy or candidate do you or have you supported that can win in the south, the west or the midwest? You can't change anything when you can't win.

It wouldn't surprise me in some of my personal ideas aren't more outre than yours when it comes down to it but the country isn't going to support them. Time makes a difference. There have been huge changes in the 73 years I've been alive. I don't want to keep handing any of it back because I ignore the good in the quest for the perfect.
 
I, too, am 73yo. There is plenty of blame to go around, but I'm sure you will agree with me that no 73yo is to blame for the mess created by these youngsters.
Alas, if only they would put down their cell phones long enough to listen and benefit from our wisdom...
 
gtyellowjacket said:
Politicians want to get their message out so they go to the media forums that are consumed by the people they want to deliver that message to. Its not unprecedented.
dat ass GIFSay What Zach Galifianakis GIF
Click to expand...
You do understand that FBI directors are not generally politicians and they don't generally have a message. They can't help being political and having a POV but, if they are properly doing their job, they should go out of their way to minimize the influence of both.
 
@Paine wrote: "Conservative coded podcasters launder disinfo through their perceived authenticity. Part of the solution is for Dems to embrace the left-liberal podcast ecosystem that exists currently. Those podcasts, more often than not, source their material and are reliable narrators."

I've read most of the last two pages and this is the point that interests me most because I teach 18 to 22 year olds. I realize that I don't know enough about their news sources. We do not talk about it enough. My daughter is 19 and is very news savvy but I note that the "big" stories for her do not always coincide with my own or when they do the focus is different. I understand that she follows Mehdi Hasan but what else she/my students are listening to is something that I need to investigate much further. New project.
 
But as an aside...wonder if a 21st century J. Edgar Hoover would appear on Rogan?
 
finesse said:
You do understand that FBI directors are not generally politicians and they don't generally have a message. They can't help being political and having a POV but, if they are properly doing their job, they should go out of their way to minimize the influence of both.
Click to expand...

finesse said:
You do understand that FBI directors are not generally politicians and they don't generally have a message. They can't help being political and having a POV but, if they are properly doing their job, they should go out of their way to minimize the influence of both.
Click to expand...
Okay. Not a politician. A bureaucrat with an interest in persuading constituents to his point of view. I'm not sure the motive is all that different between him and a politician that has gone through an election and is now running a department.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
Okay. Not a politician. A bureaucrat with an interest in persuading constituents to his point of view. I'm not sure the motive is all that different between him and a politician that has gone through an election and is now running a department.
Click to expand...
Just plead ignorance and throw yourself on the mercy of someone of gives a shit about your stupid takes on things. Go read the history of directors since Hoover and note that almost all of them were active judges and/or prosecutors. Not exactly people with constituents.
 
finesse said:
Just plead ignorance and throw yourself on the mercy of someone of gives a shit about your stupid takes on things. Go read the history of directors since Hoover and note that almost all of them were active judges and/or prosecutors. Not exactly people with constituents.
Click to expand...
Do you mean like this?

gtyellowjacket said:
Okay. Not a politician.
Click to expand...
I think you're making a point that you've already won. He's not a politician. You are completely correct. I was ignorant. Please allow me mercy for saying he was a politician. I beg of you. If you could see it in your heart to forgive me of mislabeling him as a politician, I could get on with my life without the overwhelming sense of shame and guilt.

He's a bureaucrat that wants to get his message out so he went on show to do that. It's not exactly unprecedented. And director Patel is a former federal prosecutor.
 
Last edited:
gtyellowjacket said:
Do you mean like this?


I think you're making a point that you've already won. He's not a politician. You are completely correct. I was ignorant. Please allow me mercy for saying he was a politician. I beg of you. If you could see it in your heart to forgive me of mislabeling him as a politician, I could get in with my life without the overwhelming sense of shame and guilt.

He's a bureaucrat that wants to get his message out so he went on show to do that. It's not exactly unprecedented. And director Patel is a former federal prosecutor.
Click to expand...
Compare his record to any director since Hoover and it's clear that he's far less qualified and far more politicized than any other person to hold the office.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top