Epstein Files | Ghislaine Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 75K
  • Politics 
Wasn't it just two pages ago that someone remarked that Trump answered a question in the worst way possible (from perspective of his media people)? It's so hard to imagine the depths to which Trump will stoop.

Admitting that the people Epstein brought on as sex slaves or whatever had previously worked in the Mar-A-Lago spas is probably the worst response possible. Oh, who am I kidding? It's the worst response I can think of (short of actual confession). He'll probably stoop lower twice by week's end.
 
Callatoroy said:
What does the board think might be in the files now incriminating trump that wasn't there during joe's administration?
Click to expand...
I don't presume to speak for the rest of the board but I can answer that question based on my belief. My belief is that the files have, all along, implicated Trump as being a participant in Epstein's trafficking of underage girls for sex. I don't mean that Trump was a sex trafficker, but that he simply had sex with girls whom he knew to be underage. Joe's administration was both stupid and wrong for not releasing whatever was in the files about whomever is in the files. Every single solitary person who was a participant in Epstein's escapades should have to pay a price and face justice. Every single one of them.

Ask yourself this: is it more likely or is it less likely that a person is guilty who has 1. been accused by multiple women of having had forcible sex with them when they were underage; 2. had a very well-documented relationship with Jeffrey Epstein who was sex trafficking underage women; 3. been proven to have spent time on Epstein's private plane; 4. and is currently acting like he has something to hide with regard to the release of the files? Is it more likely or less likely that there is fire to that smoke, or is it all just one big pure coincidence? If it's the latter, ask yourself whether you'd afford that same level of benefit of the doubt to a Democratic president?
 
Callatoroy said:
What does the board think might be in the files now incriminating trump that wasn't there during joe's administration?
Click to expand...
Because there is incriminating evidence against prominent Democrats and foreign dignitaries. If so I hope they're exposed and they get their comeuppance.
 
CFordUNC said:
Joe's administration was both stupid and wrong for not releasing whatever was in the files about whomever is in the files.
Click to expand...
Stupid maybe, in a tactical sense -- i.e. fighting with one hand behind one's back.

But not wrong. Justice is not served by using criminal investigations to smear third parties who happen to get caught up in the probe. Those third parties can't defend themselves against such allegations; they might not even be alleged to have done anything criminal but will have their names besmirched; and they perhaps didn't deserve any scrutiny in the first place.

And what you're suggesting is a tool of tyranny. The government can't retaliate against people for their speech -- as the belated releasee of Khalil and some of the other activists targeted for speech has demonstrated. But there are no safeguards against implicating them in a probe. So they investigate Columbia and then smear Khalil by association.
 


Probably just coincidental! Just a coincidental falling out between old business bros!
 
Callatoroy said:
What does the board think might be in the files now incriminating trump that wasn't there during joe's administration?
Click to expand...
Who knows, why is Trump fighting to cover it up?

I also don’t recall team Biden going through the files, looking for all references to Biden.

Why do the stories keep changing from Trump?
 
chrissteel said:
Biden could have just leaked a few key things about trump right before the election if it were there.
Click to expand...
No he couldn't. Merrick Garland could have, but Merrick Garland has integrity and never would do that in a thousand years. It's against the law, and certainly against DOJ regulations and that's not how Merrick Garland runs.

Not that Biden would either. He might have been diminished mentally at the end, but he's always had integrity as a public servant.
 
superrific said:
No he couldn't. Merrick Garland could have, but Merrick Garland has integrity and never would do that in a thousand years. It's against the law, and certainly against DOJ regulations and that's not how Merrick Garland runs.

Not that Biden would either. He might have been diminished mentally at the end, but he's always had integrity as a public servant.
Click to expand...
The flower with Trump is that they assume that everyone thinks and behave they way they do.

Trump was right when he called BS on conservatism though… that group was a lot more like him than they would admit.
 
Callatoroy said:
What does the board think might be in the files now incriminating trump that wasn't there during joe's administration?
Click to expand...
Stuff that Biden planted there but didn't release b/c he knew Maga would figure out it was planted if he released it. He timed it so that it would be released under Trump's administration, but he didn't count on Maga being so smart that they'd see thru the ruse. Can't fool Maga that easily, Joe...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top