Epstein Files | Ghislaine Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 92K
  • Politics 
Ddseddse said:
WT actual F?

So you're saying you're fine being a staunch supporter of a movement where "most", but notable not "all" of it's members will finally, grudgingly, draw the line at child r*pe?

You literally and intentionally typed that out and hit enter because you wanted us to know that about you.

Dude, the next time you're alone in the bathroom, you need to take a deep long look at who's staring you back in that mirror. Maybe consider making some different life decisions.
Click to expand...
Overreact much? I'll gladly admit there are very hard core MAGA who would not turn on Trump even if presented with concrete evidence of pedophilia. They would label the evidence as "fake." Don't tell me your side doesn't have equally hard core members who will excuse anything as long as the candidate is good on abortion rights, climate and LGBTQ+ issues, etc.
 
CFordUNC said:
What do you need, a close-up still photo or video of him actively participating in forcible sexual intercourse with a child? Is that what you're waiting for?

I'm not even being snarky or sarcastic, for once. I'm genuinely wondering where the line is for you.
Click to expand...
Pieces of shit like him have no line in the sand lol. It doesn’t matter how bad it gets, he’ll always come up with mental gymnastics to justify and explain away the evidence.
 
nycfan said:
And yet the discharge petition is likely to die in the Senate. But maybe Trump just wants to avoid the very unlikely outcome of the Senate taking it up, passing it & sending it to his desk and forcing him to veto it?
Click to expand...
Passing the discharge petition keeps this issue front and center, and Trump will have to continue to defend his stance.
Failure to pass it moves this discussion to the back burner and Republicans can say it's old news when asked about it.
 
nycfan said:
But they seem to be isolating Boebert as the easiest target to hotbox.
Click to expand...
hotbox

A hotbox is an air-tight room or vehicle that contains one or more pot-smokers smoking one or more joints. The exhaled smoke and the smoke coming from the joint, unable to escape, circulates and thus is breathed in and is not wasted. Smokers in a hotbox may find themselves totally fucked beyond the point of speech after about 30 minutes. Hotboxing is an event that requires some amount of planning, but ensures optimal weed usage.
 
Ramrouser said:
I've said repeatedly that if there is concrete evidence of Trump's sexual involvement with minor children, I'll repudiate him and call for his resignation. Anyone involved in that type of behavior deserves to be in jail and certainly not hold the nation's highest office.
Click to expand...
But will you acknowledge said proof if it is presented to you in what is by all reasonable measure a credible format and from a credible source or will you continue down your usual path of conspiracy theory, denial, repudiation, comparison, hypocrisy and dismissal?
 
Ramrouser said:
I've said repeatedly that if there is concrete evidence of Trump's sexual involvement with minor children, I'll repudiate him and call for his resignation. Anyone involved in that type of behavior deserves to be in jail and certainly not hold the nation's highest office.
Click to expand...
Wow ! This is wonderful that you at least have a line where Trump will lose your support... concrete evidence ( what ever that requires ? ) that Trump was sexually involved with minor children ( Does that mean kids under the age of 18yo ? )

On video bragging about sexually assaulting women ? That was ok ?
Being found liable in a court of law for sexually assaulting a woman ? That was ok ?
Being found guilty of 34 felonies in a court of law by a jury related to paying off a porn star to hide they had sex while his wife was at home taking care of their 4 month old baby ? That's ok ?

But at least you have drawn the line at having sex with minor children...baby steps

However, it would be helpful to know what age you consider to be a minor child and what you consider to be "concrete evidence" that will determine whether you call for his resignation.
 
lawtig02 said:
I am very confident that no Democrat would excuse concrete evidence of another Democrat's pedophilia.

God, I can't believe I even had to type that sentence. You guys have dragged us SO DEEP into the gutter, Ram.
Click to expand...
It's kind of crazy some of the names that have come out on the Republican side. Major Democrats have mostly dodged that. I don't think the vast number of Democratic politicians are any more or less likely to engage in pedophilia then the vast number of Republican politicians, but Republicans have really hit some big names. They had Judge Moore that cost Republicans a Senate seat in freaking Alabama. And they had the speaker of the House, Dennis hastert, who got caught up in a pedophilia crime. Jim Jordan is going through a sex scandal for some things that happened at Ohio State, but he was not the perpetrator and not actually sure it qualifies as pedophilia as I think they were college athletes.

I think the biggest name for Democrats was Anthony Weiner who was a congressman and his wife was an aide Hillary clinton.

There are semi-credible rumors of Bill Clinton and Donald Trump but until something more concrete comes out, I think they're just rumors.
 
Last edited:
Mundial said:
But will you acknowledge said proof if it is presented to you in what is by all reasonable measure a credible format and from a credible source or will you continue down your usual path of conspiracy theory, denial, repudiation, comparison, hypocrisy and dismissal?
Click to expand...
In other words, waiting for conformation by Arctic Ice... :ROFLMAO:
 
gtyellowjacket said:
It's kind of crazy some of the names that have come out on the Republican side. Major Democrats have mostly dodged that. I don't think the vast number of Democratic politicians are any more or less likely to engage in pedophilia then the vast number of Republican politicians, but Republicans have really hit some big names. They had Judge Moore that cost Republicans a Senate seat and freaking Alabama. And they had the speaker of the House, Dennis hastert, who got caught up in a pedophilia crime. Jim Jordan is going through a sex scandal for some things that happened at Ohio State, but he was not the perpetrator and not actually sure it qualifies as pedophilia as I think they were college athletes.

I think the biggest name for Democrats was Anthony Weiner who was a congressman and his wife was an aide Hillary clinton.

There are semi-credible rumors of Bill Clinton and Donald Trump but until something more concrete comes out, I think they're just rumors.
Click to expand...
Ironically, Weiner's server which contained HRC emails, spurred the Comey letter and swung the 2016 election.
 
Ramrouser said:
Overreact much? I'll gladly admit there are very hard core MAGA who would not turn on Trump even if presented with concrete evidence of pedophilia. They would label the evidence as "fake." Don't tell me your side doesn't have equally hard core members who will excuse anything as long as the candidate is good on abortion rights, climate and LGBTQ+ issues, etc.
Click to expand...

BUT WHATABOUT!?!?!
 
Mundial said:
But will you acknowledge said proof if it is presented to you in what is by all reasonable measure a credible format and from a credible source or will you continue down your usual path of conspiracy theory, denial, repudiation, comparison, hypocrisy and dismissal?
Click to expand...
Of course not. Maxwell - for no political reason - spoke of Trump spending several hours alone with a trafficked young women, While that doesn't reach the level of proof in a criminal court of law, anyone with a room temperature IQ knows exactly what this means. Anyone who claims otherwise is comfortable excusing human trafficking/pedophilia situationally.
 
Ramrouser said:
Overreact much? I'll gladly admit there are very hard core MAGA who would not turn on Trump even if presented with concrete evidence of pedophilia. They would label the evidence as "fake." Don't tell me your side doesn't have equally hard core members who will excuse anything as long as the candidate is good on abortion rights, climate and LGBTQ+ issues, etc.
Click to expand...
You're better than this. Somewhere deep inside you you know that too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top